이사회와 최고 경영층의 관계적 요인이 기업성과에 미치는 영향 = The Relationship between Board Composition Characteristics and Firm Performance

국문 초록 (Abstract)

본 연구는 대리인 이론 관점에서 최고경영자와 사외이사 간의 다양한 관계가 기업성과에 미치는 영향을 검증하였다. 구체적으로, 최고경영자와 사외이사 간 동반 재임기간이 기업성과에 미치는 영향과, 이사회 구조 특히, 최고경영자와 사외이사 간 인구통계학적 상이성과 네트워크 밀도가 기업성과에 미치는 영향을 검증하고자 하였다. 1998년을 기준으로 유가증권시장에 상장되어 있고, 사외이사를 보유하고 있으며, 2004년까지 유가증권시장에 상장되어 있는 총 358개의 기업을 대상으로 한 연구에서 다음과 같은 결론을 도출하였다. 첫째, 최고경영자와 사외이사 간 동반 재임기간은 기업성과 역 U자 형 관계를 갖는 것으로, 둘째, 최고경영자와 사외이사 간 인구통계학적 상이성은 기업성과와 정(+)의 관계를 갖는 것으로 나타났다. 셋째, 최고경영자와 사외이사 간 네트워크 밀도는 기업성과와 부(-)의 관계를 갖는 것으로 나타났다. 전반적으로 본 연구는 대리인이론을 강하게 뒷받침 하는 것을 시사하는 결과를 도출하였다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Building on the corporate governance literature and the studies focused on CEO and top management team tenure, we develop a theory of board-finn performance to explain how the composition of board of directors, board-CEO joint tenure, and the board members' network density within the board, influence finn performance. The theory and hypotheses are tested with 358 finns listed on Korea Stock Exchange (KSE) market from 1998 to 2004. The results can be summed up as follows: (1) Board-CEO joint tenure had a inverted U-shape relationship with finn performance; (2) Board demographic dissimilarity was positively associated with finn performance; (3) Board network density was negatively associated with finn performance. Overall, the results of this study strongly support agency perspectives.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서론
• Ⅱ. 문헌고찰 및 가설 개발
• Ⅲ. 연구방법
• Ⅳ. 결과
• Ⅴ. 결론
• References
• Abstract

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김성훈, "사외이사제도의 이론적 배경과 시대적 의미" 3 (3): 1-23, 2000

2 O'Reilly, C. A., "Work Group Demography, Social Integration, and Turnover" 34 : 21-37, 1981

3 Weshtphal, J. D., "Who Shall Govern? CEO/Board Power, Demographic Similarity, and New Director Selection" 40 : 60-83, 1995

4 Hambrick, D. C., "Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of its Top Managers" 9 (9): 193-206, 1984

5 Finkelstein, S., "Top Management Team Tenure and Organizational Outcomes: The Moderating Role of Managerial Discretion" 35 : 484-501, 1990

6 Wiersma, M. F., "Top Management Team Demography and Corporate Strategic Change" 35 (35): 91-121, 1992

7 Hambrick, D. C., "Top Executive Commitment to the Status Quo: Some Tests of its Determinants" 14 : 401-418, 1993

8 Moon, H. K., "Ties between Corporate Ownership and Outside Directors" 2000

9 Jensen, M.C., "Theory of the firm, managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure" 3 : 305-360, 1976

10 Pearce, J.A., "The relative power of CEO and boards of directors: Association with corporate performance" 12 : 135-153, 1991

11 Kim, Y., "The proportion and social capital of outside directors and their impacts on Firm Value: Evidence from Korea" 15 (15): 1168-1176, 2007

12 Yoshikawa, T., "The performance implications of ownership-driven Governance Reform" 21 : 698-706, 2003

13 Bhagat, S., "The non-correlation between board independence and long term firm performance" 2 : 89-108, 2002

14 DiMaggio, P.J., "The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational field" 48 : 147-160, 1983

15 Cochran, P.L., "The composition of boards of directors and incidence of golden parachutes" 28 : 664-671, 1985

16 Bhagat, S., "The Uncertain Relationship Between Board Composition and Firm Performance" 54 : 921-963, 1999

17 Norburn, D., "The Top Management Team and Corporate Performance" 9 : 225-237, 1988

18 Allen, M. P., "The Structure of Inter-organizational Elite Corporations" 39 : 393-406, 1974

19 Granovetter, M. S., "The Strength of Weak Ties" 25 : 161-178, 1973

20 Katz, R., "The Effects of Group Longevity on Project Communication and Performance" 27 : 81-104, 1982

21 Miller, D., "Stale in the Saddle: CEO Tenure and the Match Between Organization and Environment" 37 : 34-52, 1991

22 Daily, C. M., "Sources of CEO power and firm financial performance: A longitudinal assessment" 23 : 97-117, 1997

23 Brown, J. J., "Social Ties and Word-of-Mouth Referral Behavior" 14 : 350-362, 1987

24 Judge, T. A., "Social Context of Performance Evaluation Decisions" 36 : 80-105, 1993

25 Coffee, J. C., "Shareholders versus Managers: The Strain in the Corporate Web" Oxford University Press 1988

26 Fama, E.F., "Separation of ownership and control" 26 : 301-325, 1983

27 Peng, M.W., "Outside directors during institutional transitions" 25 : 453-471, 2004

28 Finkelstein, Sydney, "Not the usual suspects: How to use board process to make board better" 17 : 101-113, 2003

29 Marsden, P. V, "Network Data Measurement" 16 : 435-463, 1990

30 Jung, Y., "Multinationality and Profitability" 23 : 179-187, 1991

31 Dalton, D.R., "Meta-analytic reviews of board composition, leadership structure, and financial performance" 19 : 269-290, 1998

32 Kanter, R. M., "Men and Women of the Corporation" Basic Books 1977

33 Molz, R., "Managerial domination of boards of directors and financial performance" 16 : 235-249, 1988

34 Wei, S. J., "Local Corruption and Global Capital Flows" 2 : 303-354, 2000

35 Vafeas, N., "Length of Board Tenure and Outside Director Independence" 30 (30): 1043-1064, 2003

36 Wade, J. B., "Golden Parachutes: CEOs and the Exercise of Social Influence" 35 : 587-603, 1990

37 Agrawal, A., "Firm Performance and Mechanisms to Control Agency Problems between Managers and Shareholders" 31 : 377-397, 1996

38 Hill, C.W.L., "External control, corporate strategy, and firm performance in research intensive industries" 9 : 577-590, 1988

39 Mallette, P., "Effects of board composition and stockownership on the adoption of poison pills" 35 : 1010-1035, 1992

40 Peng, M.W., "Do outside directors and new managers help improve firm performance? An exploratory study in Russian privatization" 38 (38): 348-360, 2003

41 Michael, J., "Diversification Posture and Top Management Team Characteristics" 35 : 9-37, 1992

42 Kesner, I.F., "Directors' stock ownership and organizational performance: An investigation of Fortune 500 companies" 13 : 499-507, 1987

43 Hillman, A. J., "Corporate Political Strategies and Firm Performance: Indications of Firm-Specific Benefits from Personal Service in the U. S. Government" 20 : 67-81, 1999

44 Vance, S. C., "Corporate Leadership: Boards of Directors and Strategy" McGraw-Hill 1983

45 Finkelstein, S., "Chief Executive Compensation: A Synthesis and Reconciliation" 9 : 543-558, 1988

46 Boyd, B.K., "CEO duality and firm performance: A contingency model" 16 : 301-312, 1995

47 Shivdasani, A., "CEO Involvement in the Selection of New Board Members: An Empirical Analysis" 54 (54): 1829-1853, 1999

48 Buchanan, B., "Building Organizational Commitment: The Socialization of Managers in Work Organizations" 19 : 533-546, 1974

49 Johnson, J. L., "Board of directors: A review and research agenda" 22 : 409-438, 1996

50 Schellenger, M.H., "Board of director composition, shareholder wealth, and dividend policy" 15 : 457-467, 1989

51 Johnson, R. A., "Board of Director Involvement In Restructuring: The Effects of Board versus Managerial controls and Characteristics" 14 : 33-50, 1993

52 Kang, E., "Board leadership structure and firm performance" 13 (13): 785-799, 2005

53 Kim, Y., "Board Network Characteristics and Firm Performance in Korea" 13 (13): 800-808, 2005

54 Westphal, J. D., "Board Games: How CEOs Adapt to Increases in Structural Board Independence from Management" 43 : 511-537, 1998

55 Ghoshal, S., "Bad management theories are destroying good management practices" 4 : 75-91, 2005

56 Lipton, M., "A Modest Proposal for Improved Corporate Governance" 48 : 59-77, 1992