RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      Topographic Progression of Keratoconus in the Korean Population

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103853147

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Purpose: To develop a criterion for determining the topographic progression of keratoconus and to analyze the prognostic factors of progression.
      Methods: Medical records of 211 eyes of 128 patients who had been followed up for more than 2 years on three or more occasions were retrospectively reviewed. Topographic parameters, including simulated K, corneal astigmatism, irregular astigmatism at 3 and 5 mm, thinnest-point pachymetry, anterior and posterior elevation,and inferior minus superior index, were used to determine topographic progression. Topographic progression was determined by the greatest kappa value associated with progression to corneal graft surgery. Eyes were separated into progressed and non-progressed groups on the basis of topographic progression. The association of clinical factors with topographic progression, including demographic factors, contact lens use, corneal erosion, and atopic history at the time of diagnosis, was assessed by logistic regression.
      Results: When topographic progression was defined as five or more progressed topographic parameters, the greatest kappa value (0.354) was obtained. Ninety-four of the 211 keratoconic eyes (44.5%) were identified as topographically progressed. Age at diagnosis was significantly different between the progressed and nonprogressed groups (22.2 vs. 24.7 years, p = 0.014). Logistic regression revealed that younger age at diagnosis was a risk factor for topographic progression (odds ratio, 0.948; 95% confidence interval, 0.907 to 0.991; p =0.010).
      Conclusions: We developed a criterion for evaluating topographic progression of keratoconus using diverse topographic indices. Younger age at diagnosis was associated with topographic progression of keratoconus.
      번역하기

      Purpose: To develop a criterion for determining the topographic progression of keratoconus and to analyze the prognostic factors of progression. Methods: Medical records of 211 eyes of 128 patients who had been followed up for more than 2 years on thr...

      Purpose: To develop a criterion for determining the topographic progression of keratoconus and to analyze the prognostic factors of progression.
      Methods: Medical records of 211 eyes of 128 patients who had been followed up for more than 2 years on three or more occasions were retrospectively reviewed. Topographic parameters, including simulated K, corneal astigmatism, irregular astigmatism at 3 and 5 mm, thinnest-point pachymetry, anterior and posterior elevation,and inferior minus superior index, were used to determine topographic progression. Topographic progression was determined by the greatest kappa value associated with progression to corneal graft surgery. Eyes were separated into progressed and non-progressed groups on the basis of topographic progression. The association of clinical factors with topographic progression, including demographic factors, contact lens use, corneal erosion, and atopic history at the time of diagnosis, was assessed by logistic regression.
      Results: When topographic progression was defined as five or more progressed topographic parameters, the greatest kappa value (0.354) was obtained. Ninety-four of the 211 keratoconic eyes (44.5%) were identified as topographically progressed. Age at diagnosis was significantly different between the progressed and nonprogressed groups (22.2 vs. 24.7 years, p = 0.014). Logistic regression revealed that younger age at diagnosis was a risk factor for topographic progression (odds ratio, 0.948; 95% confidence interval, 0.907 to 0.991; p =0.010).
      Conclusions: We developed a criterion for evaluating topographic progression of keratoconus using diverse topographic indices. Younger age at diagnosis was associated with topographic progression of keratoconus.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Landis JR, "measurement of observer agreement for categorical data" 33 : 159-174, 1977

      2 Viera AJ, "Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic" 37 : 360-363, 2005

      3 Sahin A, "Two-year interval changes in Orbscan II topography in eyes with keratoconus" 34 : 1295-1299, 2008

      4 Kang YS, "The effect of the YK lens in keratoconus" 30 : 267-273, 2010

      5 Weed KH, "The Dundee University Scottish Keratoconus Study II: a prospective study of optical and surgical correction" 27 : 561-567, 2007

      6 Reeves SW, "Risk factors for progression to penetrating keratoplasty in patients with keratoconus" 140 : 607-611, 2005

      7 El-Raggal TM., "Ribof lavin-ultraviolet a corneal crosslinking for keratoconus" 16 : 256-259, 2009

      8 Oshika T, "Progression of keratoconus assessed by fourier analysis of videokeratography data" 109 : 339-342, 2002

      9 Tuft SJ, "Prognostic factors for the progression of keratoconus" 101 : 439-447, 1994

      10 Kim H, "Measure of keratoconus progression using Orbscan II" 24 : 600-605, 2008

      1 Landis JR, "measurement of observer agreement for categorical data" 33 : 159-174, 1977

      2 Viera AJ, "Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic" 37 : 360-363, 2005

      3 Sahin A, "Two-year interval changes in Orbscan II topography in eyes with keratoconus" 34 : 1295-1299, 2008

      4 Kang YS, "The effect of the YK lens in keratoconus" 30 : 267-273, 2010

      5 Weed KH, "The Dundee University Scottish Keratoconus Study II: a prospective study of optical and surgical correction" 27 : 561-567, 2007

      6 Reeves SW, "Risk factors for progression to penetrating keratoplasty in patients with keratoconus" 140 : 607-611, 2005

      7 El-Raggal TM., "Ribof lavin-ultraviolet a corneal crosslinking for keratoconus" 16 : 256-259, 2009

      8 Oshika T, "Progression of keratoconus assessed by fourier analysis of videokeratography data" 109 : 339-342, 2002

      9 Tuft SJ, "Prognostic factors for the progression of keratoconus" 101 : 439-447, 1994

      10 Kim H, "Measure of keratoconus progression using Orbscan II" 24 : 600-605, 2008

      11 Caporossi A, "Longterm results of ribof lavin ultraviolet a corneal collagen cross-linking for keratoconus in Italy: the Siena Eye Cross Study" 149 : 585-593, 2010

      12 Li X, "Longitudinal study of keratoconus progression" 85 : 502-507, 2007

      13 McMahon TT, "Longitudinal changes in corneal curvature in keratoconus" 25 : 296-305, 2006

      14 Shirayama-Suzuki M, "Longitudinal analysis of corneal topography in suspected keratoconus" 93 : 815-819, 2009

      15 Krachmer JH, "Keratoconus and related noninflammatory corneal thinning disorders" 28 : 293-322, 1984

      16 Rabinowitz YS, "Keratoconus" 42 : 297-319, 1998

      17 Pouliquen Y, "Evaluation of the rapidity of progression of keratoconus by a study of the relationship between age when first detected and age at operation" 4 : 219-221, 1981

      18 Joon Seo Hwang, "Effects of Multicurve RGP Contact Lens Use on Topographic Changes in Keratoconus" 대한안과학회 24 (24): 201-206, 2010

      19 Ertan A, "Effect of age on outcomes in patients with keratoconus treated by Intacs using a femtosecond laser" 24 : 690-695, 2008

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2024 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (재인증) KCI등재
      2019-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.11 0.11 0.12
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.1 0.13 0.482 0.03
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼