RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    한지와 유리의 물성에 기반한 ‘사이’(in-between)의 감응 표현-본인의 작업을 중심으로- = A Study on Expressing the Affectof ‘In-between’ based on the Physical properties of Hanji and Glass-Focusing on My Artistic Practice-

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110093492

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study defines the concept of the “in-between” not as a mere spatial interval, but as an aesthetic and ontological field in which affect and relationality are generated at the contact zones of opposing categories. This perspective emerges from a critical reflection on the binary structures-subject/object, human/non-human, male/female, nature/culture-constructed and reinforced throughout modern philosophy, structures that have positioned certain terms at the center while marginalizing their others. In dismantling such separations and hierarchies, the “in-between” becomes a site in which fixed identities are unsettled and existence is understood as a process of continual movement, transformation, and relational becoming. Luce Irigaray’s tactile-centered thinking on intersubjectivity and horizontal materiality, along with Karen Barad’s notion of intra-action and the performativity of matter, further expand the “in-between” into an open interval where ethical encounters with the other and material entanglements can emerge.
    The concept of the “in-between” is closely connected to the operation of affect. Affect is not a simple stimulus–response mechanism, but an event of reciprocal forces that disrupt the subject–object distinction through the mutual influence of bodies and materials. Thus, “affect in the in-between” refers not to ownership or representational relations, but to the flows of connection and resonance generated as heterogeneous material and relational conditions encounter and collide with one another. In the context of contemporary art-where practices increasingly traverse established boundaries-“the in-between” becomes a generative field in which new formal possibilities emerge, grounded in sensory novelty and material reciprocity.
    Drawing on this theoretical framework, the study analyzes the sensory entanglements and emergent surfaces produced through the combination of hanji, which carries traditional tactility and corporeality, and glass, which embodies modern temporality and transparency. Through material experiments that bring these heterogeneous substances into contact, the work explores a sensory “in-between” that traverses the boundaries of past/present, nature/artificiality, and East/West. By interpreting the affective and ontological concerns that arise from intuitive decisions and the agentive behavior of materials, the research demonstrates how the “in-between” operates not only as an aesthetic concept but as a critical site for rethinking contemporary materiality and relationality.
    번역하기

    This study defines the concept of the “in-between” not as a mere spatial interval, but as an aesthetic and ontological field in which affect and relationality are generated at the contact zones of opposing categories. This perspective emerges from...

    This study defines the concept of the “in-between” not as a mere spatial interval, but as an aesthetic and ontological field in which affect and relationality are generated at the contact zones of opposing categories. This perspective emerges from a critical reflection on the binary structures-subject/object, human/non-human, male/female, nature/culture-constructed and reinforced throughout modern philosophy, structures that have positioned certain terms at the center while marginalizing their others. In dismantling such separations and hierarchies, the “in-between” becomes a site in which fixed identities are unsettled and existence is understood as a process of continual movement, transformation, and relational becoming. Luce Irigaray’s tactile-centered thinking on intersubjectivity and horizontal materiality, along with Karen Barad’s notion of intra-action and the performativity of matter, further expand the “in-between” into an open interval where ethical encounters with the other and material entanglements can emerge.
    The concept of the “in-between” is closely connected to the operation of affect. Affect is not a simple stimulus–response mechanism, but an event of reciprocal forces that disrupt the subject–object distinction through the mutual influence of bodies and materials. Thus, “affect in the in-between” refers not to ownership or representational relations, but to the flows of connection and resonance generated as heterogeneous material and relational conditions encounter and collide with one another. In the context of contemporary art-where practices increasingly traverse established boundaries-“the in-between” becomes a generative field in which new formal possibilities emerge, grounded in sensory novelty and material reciprocity.
    Drawing on this theoretical framework, the study analyzes the sensory entanglements and emergent surfaces produced through the combination of hanji, which carries traditional tactility and corporeality, and glass, which embodies modern temporality and transparency. Through material experiments that bring these heterogeneous substances into contact, the work explores a sensory “in-between” that traverses the boundaries of past/present, nature/artificiality, and East/West. By interpreting the affective and ontological concerns that arise from intuitive decisions and the agentive behavior of materials, the research demonstrates how the “in-between” operates not only as an aesthetic concept but as a critical site for rethinking contemporary materiality and relationality.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼