헌법상 문화국가원리의 실현과 문화재 보호 관련 법령의 법정책적 과제 = Realization of the cultural national principle under the Constitution and legal policy challenges of laws related to the protection of cultural properties

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Our Constitution adopts the principle of a cultural nation as a basic constitutional principle. A cultural nation refers to a nation in which freedom of cultural activities is guaranteed by the state and culture must be supplied by the state, that is, a nation in which culture must be protected, supported, and coordinated by the state. The Constitution stipulates in its preamble that “culture… Not only does it declare to “equalize opportunities for all people in all areas,” it also imposes an obligation on the state to make efforts to inherit and develop traditional culture and promote national culture.
This principle of a cultural nation requires that the state respect the autonomy of the cultural field, maintain a neutral position in cultural policy, and ensure equal opportunity for citizens to participate in the cultural field. In addition, the state must implement active policies to protect and promote culture, and especially strive to inherit and develop traditional culture and promote national culture. Meanwhile, the cultural nation principle is realized through tasks or responsibilities related to the realization of a nation's cultural nation, and is closely and inextricably linked with the nation's cultural policy.
The state must make the principle of impartiality, which does not show a tendency to favor or give preferential treatment to any cultural phenomenon, as the basic principle of cultural policy. Today, the focus of cultural policy in cultural countries should not be on culture itself, but on creating a cultural climate in which culture can arise, and this characteristic of the cultural state principle can be said to be connected to the mark of cultural openness or pluralism.
Meanwhile, the main material for the succession and development of traditional culture granted to the country and the development of national culture can be said to be the succession and development of cultural heritage designated by the country as cultural assets. In accordance with this constitutional request, the state has an obligation to protect cultural properties, and to embody this obligation, laws related to the protection of cultural properties have been enacted and implemented.
However, as laws governing the details of the type and classification of cultural properties were enacted and implemented, the laws related to the protection of cultural properties became vast and complex, reducing the efficiency of cultural property management, so the related laws were required to be reorganized, and the Framework Act on Cultural Properties Protection was enacted. A systematic overhaul of laws and regulations was requested, starting with . The Framework Act on National Heritage, enacted last March, can be said to be the beginning of the overhaul, but legislative systemization of related laws is being requested as a follow-up measure.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 "헌재 2010.10.28. 2008헌바74 결정"

2 "헌재 2009.7.30, 2007헌마870 결정"

3 "헌재 2005. 2. 3. 2001헌가9등 결정"

4 "헌재 2004.5.27, 2003헌가1 등 결정"

5 "헌재 2003.12.18. 2002헌가2 결정"

6 "헌재 2000.6.29. 98헌바67 결정"

7 "헌재 2000.4.27. 98헌마429 결정"

8 "헌재 1991.2.11. 90헌가27 결정"

9 권영성, "헌법학원론" 법문사 2017

10 정종섭, "헌법학원론" 박영사 2014

11 이준일, "헌법학강의" 홍문사 2013

12 홍성방, "헌법학" 박영사 2011

13 김상겸, "헌법주석(Ⅰ)" 한국헌법학회 2013

14 성낙인, "헌법상 문화국가원리와 문화적 기본권" 유럽헌법학회 (30) : 1-53, 2019

15 정상우, "헌법상 문화국가원리 실현을 위한 ‘국가유산’ 법제 체계화" 한국공법학회 48 (48): 135-165, 2020

16 양건, "헌법강의" 법문사 2023

17 김민섭, "우리나라 문화재관리와 입법과제" 유럽헌법학회 (30) : 173-205, 2019

18 법제처, "문화재보호법 개정 이유 및 주요 내용"

19 김지민, "문화재 보호와 문화재향유권의 법리" 법학연구소 30 (30): 117-151, 2018

20 이종수, "문화기본권과 문화법제의 현황 및 과제" 한국공법학회 43 (43): 1-20, 2015

21 "네이버 위키백과 한국"

22 이시우, "교육복지 정책 실현을 위한 법제 방안 연구" 국회사무처 2008

23 高橋正敎, "敎育福祉入門" 光生館 1989

24 小川利夫, "敎育と福祉と權利" 勁草書房 1972

25 金銖甲, "憲法上 文化國家原理에 관한 硏究" 高麗大學校 大學院 1993