o The objectives of this study were to evaluate of achievement of HP2010 by using KCDC health surveillance system and to develop HP2010 objectives monitoring system based on KCDC health surveillance system.
o We analysed database of KCDC health surve...
o The objectives of this study were to evaluate of achievement of HP2010 by using KCDC health surveillance system and to develop HP2010 objectives monitoring system based on KCDC health surveillance system.
o We analysed database of KCDC health surveillance system and non-KCDC database to determine which data of objective can be produced. Also we evaluated a current achievement status of HP2010. We comprehensively reviewed domestic and foreign studies about health plan monitoring system and operated expert consultation. By doifig this, we suggested some reformation of HP2020 model and monitoring and evaluation system about HP2020.
o After analysing production possibility of objective, production impossibility were 26.0%. Standard which cannot be measured were 22.8% of all objectives.
o We can produce 68.0% of all measurable data from KCDC health surveillance system and 32.0% from another non-KCDC database.
o In the case of HP2010 achievement, 44.4% of all standard were improved or changed 10% from year 2005.
o Monitoring and evaluation model of HP2020 wad made with reflecting multiple dimension of HP2010, for example, domain, intended user, life course, health equity, interval of monitoring. We divided domain by determinant, intervention and outcome. For example, determinant were smoking, alcohol drinking and outcome domain contained health prevention management. We didn’t have intervention in HP2010, so we arranged infrastructure, educational program, ease accessibility and others at intervention domain.
o For smooth and successful implementation of suggested monitoring system, we must collect data from multiple database and coordinate management of database. Also we need the HP committee for continuous HP monitoring and evaluation. And operation of the monitoring and evaluation system must be based on the legal ground. We suggested an establishment of monitoring system within responsibility of government.