RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      A Clash of Contrasting Linguistic Ideas in Coriolanus

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103994156

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This paper investigates into the conflict between Coriolanus and the community in terms of their contrasting linguistic views. It argues that the whole dramatic tension of the play grows from the discrepancy between the two contrasting attitudes toward language: namely Coriolanus’s natural abhorrence of eloquence and the community’s view of language as social convenience. Coriolanus denies formal language as dissembling, falsifying play-acting for his own personal integrity and the military action. On the other hand, the community claims the need for a conventional linguistic system governed by context for wider and interactive social communication. I criticize Coriolanus’s rejection of the conventional language in favor of deeds and actions, arguing that he is too idealistic to accept that actions are intrinsically bound up with the linguistic exchange of the community. At the same time I accept Coriolanus’s obstinate, but honest, ideal pursuit to get rid of the gap between word and action. I suggest that in some sense Coriolanus is warning us to be careful in the misuse of speech. In this way I attempt to apply a more balanced perspective in analyzing the clash between Coriolanus’s and the public’s different linguistic ideas. I conclude that we cannot blame the viewpoint of Coriolanus pursuing a ideal linguistic world without a mask, nor that of community whose main concern lies in social interaction.
      번역하기

      This paper investigates into the conflict between Coriolanus and the community in terms of their contrasting linguistic views. It argues that the whole dramatic tension of the play grows from the discrepancy between the two contrasting attitudes towar...

      This paper investigates into the conflict between Coriolanus and the community in terms of their contrasting linguistic views. It argues that the whole dramatic tension of the play grows from the discrepancy between the two contrasting attitudes toward language: namely Coriolanus’s natural abhorrence of eloquence and the community’s view of language as social convenience. Coriolanus denies formal language as dissembling, falsifying play-acting for his own personal integrity and the military action. On the other hand, the community claims the need for a conventional linguistic system governed by context for wider and interactive social communication. I criticize Coriolanus’s rejection of the conventional language in favor of deeds and actions, arguing that he is too idealistic to accept that actions are intrinsically bound up with the linguistic exchange of the community. At the same time I accept Coriolanus’s obstinate, but honest, ideal pursuit to get rid of the gap between word and action. I suggest that in some sense Coriolanus is warning us to be careful in the misuse of speech. In this way I attempt to apply a more balanced perspective in analyzing the clash between Coriolanus’s and the public’s different linguistic ideas. I conclude that we cannot blame the viewpoint of Coriolanus pursuing a ideal linguistic world without a mask, nor that of community whose main concern lies in social interaction.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Cavell, Stanley, "‘Who Does the Wolf Love?’: Coriolanus and the Interpretations of Politics" 3 (3): 1-20, 1983

      2 McKenzie, Stanley D, "‘Unshout the Noise that Banish’d Martius:’ Structural Paradox and Dissembling in Coriolanus" 18 : 189-204, 1986

      3 Adelman, Janet, "‘Anger’s My Meat’: Feeding, Dependency, and Aggression in Coriolanus. Representing Shakespeare: New Psychoanalytic Essays" Johns Hopkins UP 129-149, 1980

      4 Calderwood, James, "Worldless Meanings and Meaningless Words" 6 : 211-224, 1966

      5 Walker, Jarrett, "Voiceless Bodies and Bodiless Voices: The Drama of Human Perception in Coriolanus" 43 : 170-185, 1992

      6 Kuzner, James, "Unbuilding the City: Coriolanus and the Birth of Republican Rome" 58 : 174-199, 2007

      7 Miller, Shannon, "Topicality and Subversion in William Shakespeare’s Coriolanus" 32 : 287-310, 1992

      8 Shakespeare, William, "The Riverside Shakespeare" Houghton Mifflin 1974

      9 Kahn, Coppelia, "The Milking Babe and the Bloody Man in Coriolanus and Macbeth. Man’s Estate: Masculine Identity in Shakespeare" U. of California P 151-192, 1981

      10 Sicherman, Carol M, "The Failure of Words" 39 : 189-207, 1972

      1 Cavell, Stanley, "‘Who Does the Wolf Love?’: Coriolanus and the Interpretations of Politics" 3 (3): 1-20, 1983

      2 McKenzie, Stanley D, "‘Unshout the Noise that Banish’d Martius:’ Structural Paradox and Dissembling in Coriolanus" 18 : 189-204, 1986

      3 Adelman, Janet, "‘Anger’s My Meat’: Feeding, Dependency, and Aggression in Coriolanus. Representing Shakespeare: New Psychoanalytic Essays" Johns Hopkins UP 129-149, 1980

      4 Calderwood, James, "Worldless Meanings and Meaningless Words" 6 : 211-224, 1966

      5 Walker, Jarrett, "Voiceless Bodies and Bodiless Voices: The Drama of Human Perception in Coriolanus" 43 : 170-185, 1992

      6 Kuzner, James, "Unbuilding the City: Coriolanus and the Birth of Republican Rome" 58 : 174-199, 2007

      7 Miller, Shannon, "Topicality and Subversion in William Shakespeare’s Coriolanus" 32 : 287-310, 1992

      8 Shakespeare, William, "The Riverside Shakespeare" Houghton Mifflin 1974

      9 Kahn, Coppelia, "The Milking Babe and the Bloody Man in Coriolanus and Macbeth. Man’s Estate: Masculine Identity in Shakespeare" U. of California P 151-192, 1981

      10 Sicherman, Carol M, "The Failure of Words" 39 : 189-207, 1972

      11 West, Michael, "The Controversial Eloquence of Shakespeare’s Coriolanus— an Anti-Ciceronian Orator?" 102 : 307-331, 2005

      12 Banerjee, Rita, "The Common Good and the Necessity of War: Emergent Republican Ideals in Shakespeare’s Henry V and Coriolanus" 40 : 29-49, 2006

      13 Sanders, Eve Rachele, "The Body of the Actor in Coriolanus" 57 : 387-412, 2006

      14 Riss, Arthur, "The Belly Politic: Coriolanus and the Revolt of Language" 9 : 53-75, 1992

      15 D’Amico, Jack, "Shakespeare’s Rome: Politics and Theater" 22 : 65-78, 1992

      16 Barton, Ann, "Levy, Machiavelli, and Shakespeare’s Coriolanus" 38 : 115-129, 1985

      17 Bristol, Michael, "Lenten Butchery: Legitimation Crisis in Coriolanus. Shakespeare Reproduced: The Text in History and Ideology" Methuen 207-224, 1987

      18 Fish, Stanley, "How to Do Things with Austin and Searle: Speech Act Theory and Literary Criticism" 91 : 983-1025, 1976

      19 Langis, Unhae, "Coriolanus: Inordinate Passions and Powers in Personal and Political Governance" 44 : 1-27, 2010

      20 Tennenhouse, Leonard, "Coriolanus: History and the Crisis of Semantic Order" 10 : 328-346, 1976

      21 Garganigo, Alex, "Coriolanus, the Union Controversy, and Access to the Royal Person" 42 : 335-359, 2002

      22 Ormsby, Robert, "Coriolanus, Antitheatricalism, and Audience Response" 26 : 43-62, 2008

      23 Plotz, John, "Coriolanus and the Failure of Performatives" 63 : 809-832, 1996

      24 Shrank, Cathy, "Civility and the City in Coriolanus" 54 : 406-423, 2003

      25 Sprengnether, Godlke Madelon, "Annihilating Intimacy in Coriolanus. Women in the Middle Ages and the Renaissance: Literary and Historical Perspectives" Syracuse UP 89-112, 1986

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2018 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-04-24 학회명변경 한글명 : 고전 르네상스 영문학회 -> 한국 고전 르네상스 영문학회 KCI등재
      2006-07-03 학회명변경 한글명 : 고전 르네상스영문학회 -> 고전 르네상스 영문학회 KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.22 0.22 0.22
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.19 0.15 1.112 0
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼