RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    履行障碍와 그 救濟 - 民法改正案을 중심으로  :  履行障碍와 그 救濟 = A performance failure and it’s relief - on the amendment draft of Korean Civil Code -

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    국문 초록 (Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    PartⅠㆍⅡㆍⅢ of Korean Civil Code was revised only 3 times after its establishment in 1958. 2. 22. Part Ⅰis the general provisions of civil code. Part Ⅱ is the Law of real property. Part Ⅲ is contracts and torts. The past revisions of Korean Civil Code was very slight things in their the contents.
    It is very rare to compare with other countries such as Germany, Japan. The revisions of civil code in Germany was 84 times and Japan was 13 times after 1958. 2. 22.
    It is also very rare in comparision with korean another codes such as The constitution and the commercial code. The revisions of The constitution was 9 times and the commercial code was 8 times after establishment. This amendment draft of Korean Civil Code was unique in this point.
    We can evaluate that it was increased very meaningful result by many competent Korean lawyers participate in revised work and discuss on various contents. Especially, about today’s topics “performance failure and it’s relief”, we may think it was expressed an accumulated product of Korean jurisprudence before.
    Fortunately it differs from the past.
    ① Regard Civil Code as practical thing, we made the system for amendment of civil code, when it is necessary.
    ② In the course of revision, the lot of opinions pressed from committee menbers and other scholars. they will be preseved well and Junior scholars and lawyers can study continuously the Draft and these opinions.
    Nonetheless, we are just regrettable point in several points as we see through the upper part.
    ① This draft didn’t receive results of comparative studies sufficiently. (For example, it differs from principle of CISG in cancellation and we didn’t examinate about Chinese contract law)
    ② A study period is very short and it was insufficient to reflects the opinion of academic circles and practical business groups. Because a revised plan was made for 4 years after a revised committee was decided in 1999.
    번역하기

    PartⅠㆍⅡㆍⅢ of Korean Civil Code was revised only 3 times after its establishment in 1958. 2. 22. Part Ⅰis the general provisions of civil code. Part Ⅱ is the Law of real property. Part Ⅲ is contracts and torts. The past revisions of K...

    PartⅠㆍⅡㆍⅢ of Korean Civil Code was revised only 3 times after its establishment in 1958. 2. 22. Part Ⅰis the general provisions of civil code. Part Ⅱ is the Law of real property. Part Ⅲ is contracts and torts. The past revisions of Korean Civil Code was very slight things in their the contents.
    It is very rare to compare with other countries such as Germany, Japan. The revisions of civil code in Germany was 84 times and Japan was 13 times after 1958. 2. 22.
    It is also very rare in comparision with korean another codes such as The constitution and the commercial code. The revisions of The constitution was 9 times and the commercial code was 8 times after establishment. This amendment draft of Korean Civil Code was unique in this point.
    We can evaluate that it was increased very meaningful result by many competent Korean lawyers participate in revised work and discuss on various contents. Especially, about today’s topics “performance failure and it’s relief”, we may think it was expressed an accumulated product of Korean jurisprudence before.
    Fortunately it differs from the past.
    ① Regard Civil Code as practical thing, we made the system for amendment of civil code, when it is necessary.
    ② In the course of revision, the lot of opinions pressed from committee menbers and other scholars. they will be preseved well and Junior scholars and lawyers can study continuously the Draft and these opinions.
    Nonetheless, we are just regrettable point in several points as we see through the upper part.
    ① This draft didn’t receive results of comparative studies sufficiently. (For example, it differs from principle of CISG in cancellation and we didn’t examinate about Chinese contract law)
    ② A study period is very short and it was insufficient to reflects the opinion of academic circles and practical business groups. Because a revised plan was made for 4 years after a revised committee was decided in 1999.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 머리말
    • Ⅱ. 債務不履行과 損害賠償
    • Ⅲ. 解除와 解止
    • Ⅳ. 瑕疵擔保責任
    • Ⅴ. 맺음말
    • Ⅰ. 머리말
    • Ⅱ. 債務不履行과 損害賠償
    • Ⅲ. 解除와 解止
    • Ⅳ. 瑕疵擔保責任
    • Ⅴ. 맺음말
    • [참고문헌]
    • 【ABSTRACT】
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼