PartⅠㆍⅡㆍⅢ of Korean Civil Code was revised only 3 times after its establishment in 1958. 2. 22. Part Ⅰis the general provisions of civil code. Part Ⅱ is the Law of real property. Part Ⅲ is contracts and torts. The past revisions of K...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76490812
2006
-
이행장애 ; 채무불이행 ; 하자담보책임 ; 계약책임 ; 손해배상 ; 계약해제 ; 한국의 민법개정안 ; 국제물품매매에 관한 유엔협약 ; A performance failure ; Breach of contract ; Warranty ; Responsibility of contract ; Compensation for damages ; Cancellation of contract ; the amendment draft of Korean Civil Code ; United Nations Convention on Contracts for International Sale of Goods[CISG]
360
KCI등재
학술저널
87-115(29쪽)
0
상세조회0
다운로드PartⅠㆍⅡㆍⅢ of Korean Civil Code was revised only 3 times after its establishment in 1958. 2. 22. Part Ⅰis the general provisions of civil code. Part Ⅱ is the Law of real property. Part Ⅲ is contracts and torts. The past revisions of K...
PartⅠㆍⅡㆍⅢ of Korean Civil Code was revised only 3 times after its establishment in 1958. 2. 22. Part Ⅰis the general provisions of civil code. Part Ⅱ is the Law of real property. Part Ⅲ is contracts and torts. The past revisions of Korean Civil Code was very slight things in their the contents.
It is very rare to compare with other countries such as Germany, Japan. The revisions of civil code in Germany was 84 times and Japan was 13 times after 1958. 2. 22.
It is also very rare in comparision with korean another codes such as The constitution and the commercial code. The revisions of The constitution was 9 times and the commercial code was 8 times after establishment. This amendment draft of Korean Civil Code was unique in this point.
We can evaluate that it was increased very meaningful result by many competent Korean lawyers participate in revised work and discuss on various contents. Especially, about today’s topics “performance failure and it’s relief”, we may think it was expressed an accumulated product of Korean jurisprudence before.
Fortunately it differs from the past.
① Regard Civil Code as practical thing, we made the system for amendment of civil code, when it is necessary.
② In the course of revision, the lot of opinions pressed from committee menbers and other scholars. they will be preseved well and Junior scholars and lawyers can study continuously the Draft and these opinions.
Nonetheless, we are just regrettable point in several points as we see through the upper part.
① This draft didn’t receive results of comparative studies sufficiently. (For example, it differs from principle of CISG in cancellation and we didn’t examinate about Chinese contract law)
② A study period is very short and it was insufficient to reflects the opinion of academic circles and practical business groups. Because a revised plan was made for 4 years after a revised committee was decided in 1999.
목차 (Table of Contents)