RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    한국어 학습자의 쓰기 텍스트에 대한 대조 수사학적 연구 = A Contrastive Rhetorical Study on the Texts Written by KFL-Learners

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104190259

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study is to explore some contrastive rhetorical features based on analyzing texts written by KFL-learners and to suggest a model of L2 writing from the contrastive rhetorical perspective further. Written texts of 120 advanced learners classified into 5 groups (Japanese, Chinese, Western, Russian, and South-East Asian) have been analysed and described in several respects of rhetorical features. This study consists of three parts as follows: First, the concepts of contrastive rhetoric have been examined by summarizing its historical development; Second, the categories for analyzing KFL-texts have been proposed and the analysis has been performed by the categories such as the positions of topic sentences, the methods of developing main ideas, supporting skills, and paragraphing etc.; Third, the contrastive rhetorical features of KFL-texts have been described after the analysis. The findings from this research tell us that some texts show different rhetorical features among cultures or languages. The results of the analysis also show that there are, on the other hand, some universal features KFL-texts have in common. This paper concludes with suggesting an eclectic model of L2 writing, which implies that there are certain inter-language writing steps for L2 learners. (Seoul National University)
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study is to explore some contrastive rhetorical features based on analyzing texts written by KFL-learners and to suggest a model of L2 writing from the contrastive rhetorical perspective further. Written texts of 120 advanced learn...

    The purpose of this study is to explore some contrastive rhetorical features based on analyzing texts written by KFL-learners and to suggest a model of L2 writing from the contrastive rhetorical perspective further. Written texts of 120 advanced learners classified into 5 groups (Japanese, Chinese, Western, Russian, and South-East Asian) have been analysed and described in several respects of rhetorical features. This study consists of three parts as follows: First, the concepts of contrastive rhetoric have been examined by summarizing its historical development; Second, the categories for analyzing KFL-texts have been proposed and the analysis has been performed by the categories such as the positions of topic sentences, the methods of developing main ideas, supporting skills, and paragraphing etc.; Third, the contrastive rhetorical features of KFL-texts have been described after the analysis. The findings from this research tell us that some texts show different rhetorical features among cultures or languages. The results of the analysis also show that there are, on the other hand, some universal features KFL-texts have in common. This paper concludes with suggesting an eclectic model of L2 writing, which implies that there are certain inter-language writing steps for L2 learners. (Seoul National University)

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2012-10-30 학술지명변경 한글명 : 한국어 교육 -> 한국어교육 KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2001-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.88 0.88 0.94
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.95 1.03 1.37 0.35
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼