RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    코스닥시장의 거래량과 일시적 변동성의 관계 = The Relationship between Trading Volume and Transitory Volatility in KOSDAQ Market

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103847654

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    In this study, I examined the relationship between trading volume and stock price index volatility in KOSDAQ market. Especially, this study analyzed the effect on observed volatility, fundamental volatility and transitory volatility individually. Observed volatility consists of fundamental volatility and transitory volatility. Fundamental volatility is trend component and is modelled as a random walk with drift. Transitory volatility is cyclical component and is modelled as a stationary process. Observed volatility is estimated by GJR GARCH(1,1) model. And I use Hodrick-Prescott filter to decompose total trading volume into expected and unexpected components.
    This study uses Granger causality test to analyze the relationship between trading volume and volatility over the data from January of 2002 to June of 2007. The results of this study are as follows.
    First, there is two-way Granger causality between observed volatility and total trading volume and there is two-way Granger causality between observed volatility and expected trading volume. Unexpected trading volume Granger causes observed volatility, no reverse causality was observed. That is, unexpected trading volume precedes observed volatility. Second, fundamental volatility Granger causes total trading volume. There is no Granger causality between fundamental volatility and expected trading volume. Fundamental volatility Granger causes unexpected trading volume. Third, total trading volume precedes transitory volatility. There is no Granger causality between transitory volatility and expected trading volume. Unexpected trading volume precedes transitory volatility.
    번역하기

    In this study, I examined the relationship between trading volume and stock price index volatility in KOSDAQ market. Especially, this study analyzed the effect on observed volatility, fundamental volatility and transitory volatility individually. Obse...

    In this study, I examined the relationship between trading volume and stock price index volatility in KOSDAQ market. Especially, this study analyzed the effect on observed volatility, fundamental volatility and transitory volatility individually. Observed volatility consists of fundamental volatility and transitory volatility. Fundamental volatility is trend component and is modelled as a random walk with drift. Transitory volatility is cyclical component and is modelled as a stationary process. Observed volatility is estimated by GJR GARCH(1,1) model. And I use Hodrick-Prescott filter to decompose total trading volume into expected and unexpected components.
    This study uses Granger causality test to analyze the relationship between trading volume and volatility over the data from January of 2002 to June of 2007. The results of this study are as follows.
    First, there is two-way Granger causality between observed volatility and total trading volume and there is two-way Granger causality between observed volatility and expected trading volume. Unexpected trading volume Granger causes observed volatility, no reverse causality was observed. That is, unexpected trading volume precedes observed volatility. Second, fundamental volatility Granger causes total trading volume. There is no Granger causality between fundamental volatility and expected trading volume. Fundamental volatility Granger causes unexpected trading volume. Third, total trading volume precedes transitory volatility. There is no Granger causality between transitory volatility and expected trading volume. Unexpected trading volume precedes transitory volatility.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 문규현, "한국주식시장에서 거래량변화, 수익률 및 변동성간의 영향력 분석" 대한경영학회 19 (19): 1441-1460, 2006

    2 윤창현, "주가지수선물시장에서의 투자자 유형에 따른 거래량의 정보효과" 한국파생상품학회 11 (11): 1-26, 2003

    3 김명직, "금융시계열분석" 경문사 1998

    4 송일호, "계량경제실증분석" 삼영사 2002

    5 Chen, G. M., "The dynamic relation between stock returns, trading volume, and volatility" 36 (36): 153-174, 2001

    6 Hodrick, R., "Postwar U.S. Business Cycles: An Empirical Investigation" 29 (29): 1-16, 1997

    7 Fama, E., "Permanent and temporary components of stock prices" 96 (96): 246-273, 1988

    8 Glosten, L., "On the relation between the expected value and volatility of the nominal excess return on stocks" 48 (48): 1779-1801, 1993

    9 Hwang, S., "Market risk and the concept of fundamental volatility : Measuring volatility across asset and derivative markets and testing for the impact of derivatives markets on financial markets" 24 (24): 759-785, 2000

    10 Darrat, A. F., "Intraday trading volume return volatility of the DJIA stocks : a note" 27 (27): 2035-2043, 2003

    1 문규현, "한국주식시장에서 거래량변화, 수익률 및 변동성간의 영향력 분석" 대한경영학회 19 (19): 1441-1460, 2006

    2 윤창현, "주가지수선물시장에서의 투자자 유형에 따른 거래량의 정보효과" 한국파생상품학회 11 (11): 1-26, 2003

    3 김명직, "금융시계열분석" 경문사 1998

    4 송일호, "계량경제실증분석" 삼영사 2002

    5 Chen, G. M., "The dynamic relation between stock returns, trading volume, and volatility" 36 (36): 153-174, 2001

    6 Hodrick, R., "Postwar U.S. Business Cycles: An Empirical Investigation" 29 (29): 1-16, 1997

    7 Fama, E., "Permanent and temporary components of stock prices" 96 (96): 246-273, 1988

    8 Glosten, L., "On the relation between the expected value and volatility of the nominal excess return on stocks" 48 (48): 1779-1801, 1993

    9 Hwang, S., "Market risk and the concept of fundamental volatility : Measuring volatility across asset and derivative markets and testing for the impact of derivatives markets on financial markets" 24 (24): 759-785, 2000

    10 Darrat, A. F., "Intraday trading volume return volatility of the DJIA stocks : a note" 27 (27): 2035-2043, 2003

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2016-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
    2015-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
    2013-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
    2012-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
    2011-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.77 0.77 0.82
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.82 0.8 0.825 0.14
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼