韓國 프로文藝批評에 있어서 辨證法的 리얼리즘 硏究 = A study on the Dialectical Realism of the Korean literary criticisim from 1920's to 1930's

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In this article, the Dialectical Realism is the literary criticism of Marxism before the KAPF accepts the Social Realism.
This article aims at revealing the propulsive process in the Dialectical Realism of the KAPF through controversy. If the process of propulsive Dialectical Realism of the KAPF is arranged in good order, it is as follow.
1. Controversy over the content and form between Park. Young Hee and Kim, Ki Jin.
2. Controversy over the partysim between 'Seoul Headquarter' and 'Tokyo Branch'.
3. Controversy over the popularity between Kim, Ki Jin and Lim, Hwa.
Through these controversy, the propulsive process on factors of the Marxism's literary criticism concept of the content and form, partyism, popularity-is divided into two trends. The one is to overemphasize 'superstructure' that did not go with the importance of 'the base', the other is that did not recognize the autonomy of 'superstructure' because they thought 'the base' important too highly.
We can find that the former mistake is in examples of Kim, Ki Jin in the first controversy, 'Seoul Headquarter' in the second, and Kim, Ki, Jin in the last, and the mistake is Park, Young Hee, 'Tokyo Branch' and Lim, Hwa. We can also find the same mistake in these two aspects because they did not recognize the correlation between 'the base' and 'superstructure'.
I think that the latter is nearer to the literary criticism of Marxism than the fomer. Because the latter devoted themseves to the movement for independence of the nation under the control of Japanese imperialism and had the thorough recognition on 'the base'.