어순도치구문의 담화 기능 분석 = A discourse function of Inversion

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

What has priority in the communication with the other is the transmission of correct messages. On the other hand, the use of various devices for smooth communication also is a way to lead the conversation. Conjecturing that the speaker’s intention are contained in moving constituents leftward or rightward deviant from the regular word order, this paper has classified inversion constructions with transcription data containing natural everyday conversations as its objects, and investigated the mechanism of occurrence of these constructions. As a result, it appears that the rightward inversion construction reflects the speaker’s attitude toward the transmission of the correct information. So the rightward inversion construction is one of the discourse devices that best meet the basis of conversation. Contrastively, the leftward inversion construction features the speaker’s intention for the conversation participants. There are some advantages for making the hearer understand the gist of the speaker’s messages in moving some constituents leftward in the current conversational situation even if the move elements are old information. In addition, given the fact that there are many examples related to taking the initiative in conversations, including initial revelation of shocking contents for making the hearer pay attention to what are being said, and replacement of the topic presented by the other with the one introduced by the speaker, it can be claimed that the concept of effective information transmission, rather than correct information transmission, is the main mechanism of occurrence of the leftward inversion construction.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 전영옥, "한국어 억양단위 연구 - 통사적 특징을 중심으로" 담화ㆍ인지언어학회 10 (10): 241-265, 2003

2 박성현, "한국어 말차례 체계와 화제" 서울대 1996

3 김미경, "한국어 대화체 구문의 정보구조" 담화인지언어학회 8 (8): 21-42, 2002

4 이은경, "텔레비전 토크쇼 텍스트 연결어미 분석" 5 : 167-198, 1998

5 정희자, "주제의 담화기능에 대하여" 563-598, 1994

6 채 완, "조사 ‘-는’의 의미" 39 : 93-113, 1976

7 구현정, "조건 담화의 순서 교대 양상" 언어과학회 21 : 1-24, 2002

8 서정수, "접속어미 {ㄴ/는데}에 관하여" 국어국문학회 61 : 96-98, 1973

9 정희자, "영어 담화에서 담화전략과 어순변화" 2 : 21-45, 1996

10 유현경, "연결어미의 종결어미적 쓰임에 대하여" 한글학회 261 : 123-148, 2003

11 김용석, "연결어미 ‘는데’에 대하여" 배달말학회 6 : 269-291, 1981

12 김해연, "대화, 사회행위, 그리고 문법" 중앙대 인문과학연구소 33 : 41-74, 2001

13 김규현, "담화와 문법" 담화인지언어학회 7 (7): 155-184, 2000

14 김해연, "기능문법과 담화분석" 중앙대 인문과학연구소 26 : 17-39, 1997

15 유구상, "국어의 도치에 대한 고찰" 155 : 115-144, 1975

16 홍사만, "국어 특수조사론" 학문사 1983

17 임규홍, "국어 생략현상에 대한 연구" 한국어문학회 57 : 281-319, 1996

18 이희자, "‘의사소통의 최소단위’로서의 ‘발화문’과 ‘문장’" 한국텍스트언어학회 13 : 343-366, 2002

19 Kuno, Susume, "generative discourse analysis in America. Current trends intextlinguistics, ed by Wolfgang Dressler" De Gruyter 275-294, 1978

20 Prince, Ellen, "Toward a taxonomy of given-new information, Radical Pragmatics" Academic Press 223-54, 1981

21 이기동, "The pragmatic function of the connective nuntey(in korean)" 연세대 인문과학연구소 41 : 117-142, 1979

22 Yong-Yae Park, "The Korean connective nuntey in conversational discourse" 31 : 1998

23 Lee, Hyo Sang, "Tense, aspect, and modality: A discourse-pragmatic analysis of verbal suffix in Korean from a typological perspective"

24 Brown P, "Politeness" Cambridge Univ. Press 1987

25 Halliday, M. A. K., "Notes on transitivity and therme in English" 3 : 199-244, 1967

26 Ford, E. C., "Grammar in interaction" Cambridge University Press 1993

27 Chafe, Wallace, "Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view, Subject and topic" Academic Press 27-55, 1976

28 Kuno,Susume, "Functional sentence perspective" 3 : 269-320, 1972

29 Chafe, Wallace, "Discourse, Consciousness, and Time" The University of Chichago Press 1994

30 Du Bois, John, "Discourse Transcription, Santa Barbara Paper in Linguistics" 1992

31 Schiffrin, Deborah, "Discourse Markers" Cambridge University Press 1987

32 Gundel, "Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse" 69 : 274-307, 1993