RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      한국인 50대의 노인용 코하우징 공유공간과 공동활동에 대한 선호 - 서울과 지방도시 간 차이 비교를 중심으로 - = Preference of Common Spaces and Shared Activities in Senior Cohousing Community by Korean 50s - In Reference to Difference between Seoul and Other Cities -

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101790211

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The aim of this paper is to find out different preference of common spaces and shared activities in senior cohousing community between regions in Korea: Seoul and other cities. Social survey was conducted nationwide and the respondents were 50s only, since they are the generation who will face to elderly housing subject within 10 years in turbulent Korean society. Collected data, about 1000, were analyzed by SPSS program using frequency, percentage, and Chi-square test. In summary, respondents mostly would like to move to senior cohousing on circumstance when they remain alone without big difference between regions. Loneliness and housekeeping were considered as the most difficult issues for the elderly to manage by themselves. Among common spaces, exercise room was the most preferred space to meeting room and kitchen. Exercise room was more preferred in Seoul than in other cities, on the contrary meeting room was evidently less preferred in other cities than in Seoul. Regarding shared activities, resident meeting, gardening, and common meal were revealed as less preferred activities than hobby exercise and tea meeting. As a conclusion, I would like to propose that a big common living room is better to be designed for meeting room cum dining and gathering room with flexibility in order to give residents chances to know each other more often. And since common space and shared activity show different preferences by regions, those are to be designed and planned reflecting region's different circumstance.
      번역하기

      The aim of this paper is to find out different preference of common spaces and shared activities in senior cohousing community between regions in Korea: Seoul and other cities. Social survey was conducted nationwide and the respondents were 50s only, ...

      The aim of this paper is to find out different preference of common spaces and shared activities in senior cohousing community between regions in Korea: Seoul and other cities. Social survey was conducted nationwide and the respondents were 50s only, since they are the generation who will face to elderly housing subject within 10 years in turbulent Korean society. Collected data, about 1000, were analyzed by SPSS program using frequency, percentage, and Chi-square test. In summary, respondents mostly would like to move to senior cohousing on circumstance when they remain alone without big difference between regions. Loneliness and housekeeping were considered as the most difficult issues for the elderly to manage by themselves. Among common spaces, exercise room was the most preferred space to meeting room and kitchen. Exercise room was more preferred in Seoul than in other cities, on the contrary meeting room was evidently less preferred in other cities than in Seoul. Regarding shared activities, resident meeting, gardening, and common meal were revealed as less preferred activities than hobby exercise and tea meeting. As a conclusion, I would like to propose that a big common living room is better to be designed for meeting room cum dining and gathering room with flexibility in order to give residents chances to know each other more often. And since common space and shared activity show different preferences by regions, those are to be designed and planned reflecting region's different circumstance.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 "한국의 맞벌이 부부를 위한 코하우징 계획" 2005

      2 "한국 농촌형 코하우징 계획에 관한 연구" 2005

      3 "코하우징의 공동생활공간 디자인" 2004

      4 "코하우징 개발개념을 적용한 교외지역 주 거단지 계획방법에 대한 연구" 2006

      5 "중년층의 노후생활과 노인공동생 활주 택 입주에 대한 태도" 22 (22): 121-131, 2004

      6 "예비노인층의 노인공동생 활주택의 유니트 공간계획요소에 관한 선호연구" 23 (23): 37-47, 2005

      7 "스칸디나비아 노인용 코하우징 주민의 이 주동기" 19 (19): 129-138, 2003

      8 "스칸디나비아 노인용 코하우징 의 계획과 적용" 집문당, 서울 2006

      9 "선호하는 개발자 유형에 따른 노 인공동 생활주택의 개발과 관리, -개발, 주민, 비용을 중 심으로-" 23 (23): 39-51, 2005

      10 "노후의 일과 여가에 대한 의식과 자립형 노인커뮤니티 입주의사" 17 (17): 155-164, 2006

      1 "한국의 맞벌이 부부를 위한 코하우징 계획" 2005

      2 "한국 농촌형 코하우징 계획에 관한 연구" 2005

      3 "코하우징의 공동생활공간 디자인" 2004

      4 "코하우징 개발개념을 적용한 교외지역 주 거단지 계획방법에 대한 연구" 2006

      5 "중년층의 노후생활과 노인공동생 활주 택 입주에 대한 태도" 22 (22): 121-131, 2004

      6 "예비노인층의 노인공동생 활주택의 유니트 공간계획요소에 관한 선호연구" 23 (23): 37-47, 2005

      7 "스칸디나비아 노인용 코하우징 주민의 이 주동기" 19 (19): 129-138, 2003

      8 "스칸디나비아 노인용 코하우징 의 계획과 적용" 집문당, 서울 2006

      9 "선호하는 개발자 유형에 따른 노 인공동 생활주택의 개발과 관리, -개발, 주민, 비용을 중 심으로-" 23 (23): 39-51, 2005

      10 "노후의 일과 여가에 대한 의식과 자립형 노인커뮤니티 입주의사" 17 (17): 155-164, 2006

      11 "노후에는 어디에서 살까" 지식마당, 서울 2004

      12 "Senior Cohousing in Denmark and Sweden, Presentation Paper at 2004 ENHR International Conference" 2004

      13 "Resolution on Housing Issues and Housing Preference for Later Life in Korean Middle-aged People" 10 (10): 127-138, 2003

      14 "Provision of Affordable Housing for Urban Seniors in a New Era" 6 (6): 1-9, 2004

      15 "Preference of Common Spaces and Shared Activities in Senior Cohousing Community by Korean 50s" Ljubljana Slovenia : 2006

      16 "Perceptions of Senior Cohousing by 50s Living in Seoul Area" Cambridge UK : 2004

      17 "From Collective Housing to Cohousing- A Summary of Research" 17 (17): 164-177, 2000

      18 "Evaluation of Community Planning and Life of Seniior Cohousing Residents in Northern European Countries" 12 (12): 1189-1216, 2004

      19 "Collective Housing in Scandinavia- How Feminism Revised a Modernist Experiment" 14 (14): 329-342, 1997

      20 "Characteristic of Cohousing Design in USA and Sweden" 8 : 55-67, 2005

      21 "A Study of Life and Physical Environment of Senior Cohousing in Scandinavian Countries; with Significance for Future Quality of Life in European and East Asian Countries" Stockholm Sweden 2003

      22 "4월호 특집, 이웃과 더불어 사는 주택" 코하우징 (4) : 38-53, 2006

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2015-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2000-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.52 0.52 0.51
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.54 0.53 0.797 0.13
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼