RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      한국 손해보험사의 해외 재보험거래의 효율성 분석 = Efficiency of Reassurance of Korean Insurance Firms - comparative study with French Insurance Firms -

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82614792

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This paper examines the efficiency of reassurance of Korean insurance firms by comparing with the efficiency of reassurance of French firms. We compare cession and retention level of reassurance, forms of contracts, demand for reassurance with respect to their size of insurance firms. We find that there exists earnings management differences between the two countries. In contrast with France, Korean insurance firms are likely to transfer desirable risks and cede the risks to foreign reinsurers. This leads to increase deficits in reassurance accounts and aggravate earnings. The reciprocity is not a prevalent method of risks transferring. Korean insurance firms need to develop their own solution system to evaluate risks to avoid rate increases,
      reduce cession to reinsurers, and increase retentions. Finally, they need to decrease debt level and increase
      capital level to increase solvency.
      번역하기

      This paper examines the efficiency of reassurance of Korean insurance firms by comparing with the efficiency of reassurance of French firms. We compare cession and retention level of reassurance, forms of contracts, demand for reassurance with respect...

      This paper examines the efficiency of reassurance of Korean insurance firms by comparing with the efficiency of reassurance of French firms. We compare cession and retention level of reassurance, forms of contracts, demand for reassurance with respect to their size of insurance firms. We find that there exists earnings management differences between the two countries. In contrast with France, Korean insurance firms are likely to transfer desirable risks and cede the risks to foreign reinsurers. This leads to increase deficits in reassurance accounts and aggravate earnings. The reciprocity is not a prevalent method of risks transferring. Korean insurance firms need to develop their own solution system to evaluate risks to avoid rate increases,
      reduce cession to reinsurers, and increase retentions. Finally, they need to decrease debt level and increase
      capital level to increase solvency.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Abstract
      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • Ⅱ. 재보험에 관한 이론적 고찰
      • Ⅲ. 한국 보험사의 재보험거래 동향
      • Ⅳ. 프랑스 보험사의 재보험거래 동향
      • Abstract
      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • Ⅱ. 재보험에 관한 이론적 고찰
      • Ⅲ. 한국 보험사의 재보험거래 동향
      • Ⅳ. 프랑스 보험사의 재보험거래 동향
      • Ⅴ. 결론
      • 참고문헌
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼