RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Intra-regional trade of ASEAN+3: Trends and issues for the economic integration of East Asia

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104913092

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This paper examined the structures and characteristics of ASEAN+3 intra-regional trade through an analysis of intra-regional trade share, the intra-regional trade intensity index, and the regional trade introversion index in terms of primary goods, intermediate goods, and final goods. We could see that the economic integration of ASEAN+3 would be enlarged and deepened through the progress and advancement of intra-regional trade. However, we found that although the volume and share of intra-regional trade has been growing, this may not indicate or guarantee the inherent advancement of the economic integration of the region. In particular, since the global financial economic crisis in 2008–2009 the introversion of the EU and NAFTA has grown, while that of ASEAN+3 has reduced. In this respect, it would be vital to make and practice innovative plans to develop intra-regional trade so that the foundation of the FTA among ASEAN+3 countries could be the catalyst for substantial development of intra-regional trade. Furthermore, in order for intra-regional trade to continue to develop, a more comprehensive and higher level of intra-regional economic integration is required. This can be realized through regulation, specific plans, and practical effort. Finally, to maximize the effect of intra-regional trade liberalization this needs to go beyond the boundary of intermediate goods and expand into final goods, especially consumption goods.
      번역하기

      This paper examined the structures and characteristics of ASEAN+3 intra-regional trade through an analysis of intra-regional trade share, the intra-regional trade intensity index, and the regional trade introversion index in terms of primary goods, in...

      This paper examined the structures and characteristics of ASEAN+3 intra-regional trade through an analysis of intra-regional trade share, the intra-regional trade intensity index, and the regional trade introversion index in terms of primary goods, intermediate goods, and final goods. We could see that the economic integration of ASEAN+3 would be enlarged and deepened through the progress and advancement of intra-regional trade. However, we found that although the volume and share of intra-regional trade has been growing, this may not indicate or guarantee the inherent advancement of the economic integration of the region. In particular, since the global financial economic crisis in 2008–2009 the introversion of the EU and NAFTA has grown, while that of ASEAN+3 has reduced. In this respect, it would be vital to make and practice innovative plans to develop intra-regional trade so that the foundation of the FTA among ASEAN+3 countries could be the catalyst for substantial development of intra-regional trade. Furthermore, in order for intra-regional trade to continue to develop, a more comprehensive and higher level of intra-regional economic integration is required. This can be realized through regulation, specific plans, and practical effort. Finally, to maximize the effect of intra-regional trade liberalization this needs to go beyond the boundary of intermediate goods and expand into final goods, especially consumption goods.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 나희량, "중국-ASEAN 간 경제통합: FTA 이후의 변화를 중심으로" 국제학연구소 18 (18): 67-95, 2009

      2 김준협, "아세안+3 지역 경제통합의 조건과 발전 과정" 한국동남아학회 21 (21): 205-243, 2011

      3 이종하, "동아시아 국가의 환율변동 요인 분석" 한국동남아학회 22 (22): 1-37, 2012

      4 Amyx J, "What motivates regional financial cooperation in East Asia today?" East-West Center 76 : 1-8, 2005

      5 Munakata N, "Transforming East Asia: The Evolution of Regional Economic Integration" Brookings Institution Press 2006

      6 Chey H, "The changing political dynamics of East Asian financial cooperation" 49 (49): 450-467, 2009

      7 Eichengreen B, "The Asian Financial Crisis and the Architecture of Global Finance" Cambridge University Press 2000

      8 World Trade Organisation, "Regional Trade Agreements database"

      9 Balassa B, "Recent Developments in the Competitiveness of American Industry and Prospects for the Future" Yale University Press 1962

      10 "RIETI-TID"

      1 나희량, "중국-ASEAN 간 경제통합: FTA 이후의 변화를 중심으로" 국제학연구소 18 (18): 67-95, 2009

      2 김준협, "아세안+3 지역 경제통합의 조건과 발전 과정" 한국동남아학회 21 (21): 205-243, 2011

      3 이종하, "동아시아 국가의 환율변동 요인 분석" 한국동남아학회 22 (22): 1-37, 2012

      4 Amyx J, "What motivates regional financial cooperation in East Asia today?" East-West Center 76 : 1-8, 2005

      5 Munakata N, "Transforming East Asia: The Evolution of Regional Economic Integration" Brookings Institution Press 2006

      6 Chey H, "The changing political dynamics of East Asian financial cooperation" 49 (49): 450-467, 2009

      7 Eichengreen B, "The Asian Financial Crisis and the Architecture of Global Finance" Cambridge University Press 2000

      8 World Trade Organisation, "Regional Trade Agreements database"

      9 Balassa B, "Recent Developments in the Competitiveness of American Industry and Prospects for the Future" Yale University Press 1962

      10 "RIETI-TID"

      11 Katada S, "Politics that constrains: The logic of fragmented regionalism in East Asia" 2009

      12 Austria SM, "Moving towards an ASEAN economic community" 29 (29): 141-156, 2012

      13 Sohn I, "Learning to co-operate: China’s multilateral approach to Asian financial co-operation" 194 : 309-326, 2008

      14 Hayashi S, "Japan and East Asian Monetary Regionalism: Towards a Proactive Leadership Role?" Routledge 2006

      15 Pomfret R, "International Economic Integration and Asia" World Scientific 2006

      16 Kawai M, "International Economic Integration and Asia" World Scientific 2006

      17 Kawai M, "Free trade agreements in East Asia: A way toward trade liberalization?" 2010

      18 East Asia Study Group, "Final Report of the East Asia Study Group"

      19 Dieter H, "Exploring alternative theories of economic regionalism: From trade to finance in Asian co-operation?" 10 (10): 430-454, 2003

      20 Mirus R, "Economic Integration: Free Trade Areas vs. Customs Unions" Western Centre for Economic Research 2001

      21 Pempel TJ, "Crisis as Catalyst: Asia’s Dynamic Political Economy" Cornell University Press 2008

      22 MacIntyre A, "Crisis as Catalyst: Asia’s Dynamic Political Economy" Cornell University Press 2008

      23 Wong J, "China-ASEAN free trade agreement: Shaping future economic relations" 43 (43): 507-526, 2003

      24 Lee S, "Advancing East Asian Regionalism" Routledge 2007

      25 Stubbs R, "ASEAN plus three: Emerging East Asian regionalism?" 42 (42): 440-455, 2002

      26 Hill H, "ASEAN economic integration: Features, fulfillments, failures and the future" 1-44, 2010

      27 "ASEAN Secretariat"

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2011-03-28 학술지명변경 한글명 : International Area Review -> International Area Studies Review KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-03-24 학회명변경 한글명 : 국제지역학센터 -> 국제지역연구센터 KCI등재
      2009-03-23 학회명변경 한글명 : 외국학종합연구센터 -> 국제지역학센터 KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.02 0.02 0.05
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.05 0.04 0.222 0.09
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼