초등학교 영어 지도서에 제시된 교사의 Scaffolding 발문 유형 분석 = An analysis of the types of scaffolding in the teacher`s guide for elementary school English text books.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this study is to investigate the scaffolding types of teachers in the teacher’s guide for elementary English text books based on the 7th National Curriculum. The investigation finds that there are some inconsistences between teacher’s roles supported in the national curriculum and the actual teacher's guide. According to the national curriculum, the teacher’s role should be that of a facilitator of interaction and a scaffolder of communication. This study reveals that the teacher scaffolding directions in the teachers guide for elementary English text books are mostly dependent on the recognition of simple facts and verification of understanding rather than as a scaffolder of interaction and communication. Through this investigation of the scaffolding in the teachers guide, it is suggested that future teacher’s guide for elementary English text books need to include teacher scaffolding types which would be more diverse in the interaction and communication between teachers and students.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 최희선, "협동 학습을 위한 상호 작용 유형과 scaffolding에 관한 연구" 한국교원대학교 2002

2 교육인적자원부, "초등학교 영어 6학년 교사용 지도서" 대한교과서주식회사 2002

3 교육인적자원부, "초등학교 교육과정해설(V)." 대한교과서주식회사. 1997

4 방영경, "초등영어 수업에서 아동 간 상호 작용에 대한 연구" 인천교육대학교 2001

5 이재관, "외국어 습득을 위한 학습자의 상호 작용에 관한 연구: 의미 협의를 중심으로." 한국교원대학교 2000

6 오일화, "상호 작용적 의사소통 활동이 영어 구문의 습득에 미치는 효과" 한국교원대학교 2001

7 김정호, "비계설정을 통한 읽기 부진아 지도 방법 연구" 한국교원대학교 2001

8 이희주, "교사와 또래와의 상호작용에 따른 scaffolding 유형과 문제 해결력의 차이 분석." 한국교원대학교 2000

9 Long, "University of California" Unpublished doctoral dissertation 1980

10 Vygotsky,L.S, "Thought and language" MIT Press 1962

11 Ellis,R, "The study of second language acquisition" Oxford University Press 1994

12 McNaughton,S, "The shifting focus of maternal tutoring across different difficulty levels on a problem solving task" 8 : 147-155, 1990

13 Wood,D, "The role of tutoring in problem solving" 17 : 89-100, 1976

14 Krashen,S.D, "The input hypothesis:Issues and implications" Longman 1985

15 Allwright,D, "The importance of interaction in classroom language learning" 5 : 156-171, 1984

16 Pica,T, "The impact of interaction on comprehension" 21 : 737-758, 1987

17 Ellis, "Teacher-pupil interaction in second language development Input in second language acquisition" Newbury House Publishers Inc 69-85, 1985

18 Snow, C. E.,, "Talking to children: Language input and acquisition." Cambridge University Press 1997

19 Mitchell, R.,, "Second language learning theories." Edward Arnold 1998

20 Reid,D.K, "Scaffolding: A broad view." 31 : 386-400, 1998

21 Berk, L. E.,, "Scaffolding children’s learning: Vygotsky and early childhood education." National Association for the Education of Young Children. 1995

22 Langer, "Reading and writing as natural language activities" 168-175, 1983

23 Krashen,S.D, "Principles and practice in second language acquisition" Pergamon Press 1982

24 Kewley,L, "Peer collaboration versus teacher-directed instruction: How two methodologies engage students in the learning process." 13 : 27-32, 1998

25 Bruner,J.S, "Organization of early skilled action" 44 : 1-11, 1973

26 A, "Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development" 465-483, 1994

27 Portes, "Mother-child interaction across culture From intersubjectivity to regulation in the zone of proximal development Paper presented at the AERA annual meeting" 1991

28 Vygotsky,L.S, "Mind in society:The development of higher psychological processes" Harvard University Press 1978

29 Lee, Haemoon., "Interactional modification of input in second/ foreign language acquisition." Georgetown University. 1997

30 In J, "Georgetown round-table on languages and linguistics" Georgetown University Press 168-180, 1980

31 Long, "A role for instruction in second language acquisition" Pienemann 79-99, 1985