RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    The Role of Reading Strategies and Beliefs in Second Language Reading Comprehension

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104218824

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The study examines EFL learners’ strategy use and beliefs in reading comprehension at the university level in Korea. Ninety undergraduate students taking a reading course were asked to take a TOEFL reading test and to complete a questionnaire on the first day of instruction. Five composite variables were extracted through factor analyses; (1) Self-efficacy in Reading; (2) Metacognitive Reading Strategies; (3) Bottom-up Cognitive Reading Strategies; (4) Reading as Translation; and (5) Silent Reading. Multivariate analyses of variance followed by Tukey’s post-hoc procedures revealed that Self-efficacy beliefs, Reading as Translation and Silent Reading were significant factors determining students’ levels of reading proficiency. Multiple regression analyses further indicated that the variable of Self-efficacy in Reading may be considered the best predictor for students’ reading proficiency, with the moderate account by the second composite variable of students’ use of Silent Reading technique. In conclusion, the present study added a portion of evidence to the interactive relationship between reading strategies, self-efficacy and L2 reading proficiency suggested in the previous research. Based on the findings, the implications and suggestions were provided.
    번역하기

    The study examines EFL learners’ strategy use and beliefs in reading comprehension at the university level in Korea. Ninety undergraduate students taking a reading course were asked to take a TOEFL reading test and to complete a questionnaire on the...

    The study examines EFL learners’ strategy use and beliefs in reading comprehension at the university level in Korea. Ninety undergraduate students taking a reading course were asked to take a TOEFL reading test and to complete a questionnaire on the first day of instruction. Five composite variables were extracted through factor analyses; (1) Self-efficacy in Reading; (2) Metacognitive Reading Strategies; (3) Bottom-up Cognitive Reading Strategies; (4) Reading as Translation; and (5) Silent Reading. Multivariate analyses of variance followed by Tukey’s post-hoc procedures revealed that Self-efficacy beliefs, Reading as Translation and Silent Reading were significant factors determining students’ levels of reading proficiency. Multiple regression analyses further indicated that the variable of Self-efficacy in Reading may be considered the best predictor for students’ reading proficiency, with the moderate account by the second composite variable of students’ use of Silent Reading technique. In conclusion, the present study added a portion of evidence to the interactive relationship between reading strategies, self-efficacy and L2 reading proficiency suggested in the previous research. Based on the findings, the implications and suggestions were provided.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 Elbaum, "and task definition in self-regulated foreign language learning" 316-336, 1993

    2 Paris, "and study strategies of good and poor readers Journal of Reading Behavior" 5-22, 1981

    3 Anderson, N. J, "Using telescopes, microscopes and kaleidoscopes to put metacognition into perspective." 12 (12): 1-2, 2002

    4 Smith,F, "Understanding reading:A psycholinguistic analysis of reading and learning to read" Holt Rinehard and Winston 1994

    5 Kim,S.A, "Types of reading strategies used by Korean high school EFL students" 46 : 239-268, 1993

    6 Choi,Y.H, "Transfer of literacy skills from Korean to English" 50 (50): 71-96, 1995

    7 Ham,S, "The self-efficacy model of language learning strategy and EFL reading achievement." 57 (57): 111-130, 2002

    8 Devine, "The role of metacognition in second language reading and writing Reading in the composition classroom" 105-130, 1993

    9 Lee, J. W.,, "The relative contribution of L2 language proficiency and L1 reading ability to L2 reading performance: A test of the threshold hypothesis." 31 (31): 713-739, 1997

    10 Song,H.S, "The relationship between adult readers’ perceptions of reading in a second language and their reading processes" 48 : 349-372, 1994

    1 Elbaum, "and task definition in self-regulated foreign language learning" 316-336, 1993

    2 Paris, "and study strategies of good and poor readers Journal of Reading Behavior" 5-22, 1981

    3 Anderson, N. J, "Using telescopes, microscopes and kaleidoscopes to put metacognition into perspective." 12 (12): 1-2, 2002

    4 Smith,F, "Understanding reading:A psycholinguistic analysis of reading and learning to read" Holt Rinehard and Winston 1994

    5 Kim,S.A, "Types of reading strategies used by Korean high school EFL students" 46 : 239-268, 1993

    6 Choi,Y.H, "Transfer of literacy skills from Korean to English" 50 (50): 71-96, 1995

    7 Ham,S, "The self-efficacy model of language learning strategy and EFL reading achievement." 57 (57): 111-130, 2002

    8 Devine, "The role of metacognition in second language reading and writing Reading in the composition classroom" 105-130, 1993

    9 Lee, J. W.,, "The relative contribution of L2 language proficiency and L1 reading ability to L2 reading performance: A test of the threshold hypothesis." 31 (31): 713-739, 1997

    10 Song,H.S, "The relationship between adult readers’ perceptions of reading in a second language and their reading processes" 48 : 349-372, 1994

    11 Jimenez, R. T.,, "The reading strategies of Latino students who are successful English readers: Opportunities and obstacles in bilingual reading." 31 (31): 90-112, 1996

    12 Carrell,P.L, "The effects of rhetorical organization on ESL readers" 18 (18): 441-469, 1984

    13 Block,E, "The comprehension strategies of second language readers" 20 : 463-494, 1986

    14 Nuttall,C, "Teaching reading skills in a foreign language" Heinemann 1996

    15 Grabe, W.,, "Teaching and researching reading." Pearson Education. 2000

    16 Kletzein,S.B, "Strategy use by good and poor comprehenders reading expository text of differing levels" 26 : 67-86, 1991

    17 Lantolf,J.P, "Strategies for accessing bilingual dictionaries:A question of regulation" 68 : 858-864, 1985

    18 Bandura,A, "Social foundations of thoughts and action" Prentice-Hall 1986

    19 Block,E, "See how they read:Comprehension monitoring of L1 and L2 readers" 20 : 463-494, 1992

    20 Kern,R, "Second language reading instruction:Its effects on comprehension and word inference ability" 73 : 135-149, 1989

    21 Barnett,M.A, "Reading through context:How real and perceived strategy use affects L2 comprehension" 72 (72): 150-162, 1988

    22 Song,M.J, "Reading strategies and second langage reading ability: The magnitude of the relationship." 54 (54): 73-95, 1999

    23 Clarke,M.A, "Reading in Spanish and English:Evidence from adult ESL students" 29 : 159-179, 1979

    24 Sasaki,Y, "Paths of processing strategy transfers in learning Japanese and English as foreign languages:A competition model approach" 16 : 43-72, 1994

    25 Goodman,K.S, "On reading" Neinemann 1996

    26 Li, S.,, "Metacognitive strategies in second langauge academic reading: A qualitative investigation." 15 : 199-216, 1996

    27 Carrell,P.L, "Metacognitive awarenss and second language reading" 73 : 120-133, 1989

    28 Flavell,J, "Metacognition and cognitive monitoring:A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry" 34 : 906-911, 1979

    29 Carrell, "Metacognitie strategy training for ESL reading" 647-678, 1989

    30 Garner,R, "Metacogition and reading comprehension" Ablex 1987

    31 Stanovich,K.E, "Matthew effects in reading:Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy" 21 : 360-407, 1986

    32 Brown, "Learning to learn On training students to learn from texts" 14-21, 1981

    33 O’Malley, "Learning strategies used by beginning and intermediate ESL students" 21-46, 1985

    34 O’Malley,J.M, "Learning strategies in second language acquisition" Cambridge University Press 1990

    35 Wen, Q.,, "L2 learner variables and English achievement: A study of tertiary-level English majors in China." 18 (18): 27-48, 1997

    36 Chin,C, "Korean college ESL readers’ metacognitive awareness and preferences about reading in English." 52 (52): 83-102, 1997b

    37 Carrell, P.,, "Interactive approaches to second language reading." Cambridge University Press 1998

    38 Anderson,N.J, "Individual differences in strategy use in second language reading and testing" 75 : 460-472, 1991

    39 Wilson, "Implications of learning strategy research and training What it has to say to the practitioner" In C Academic Press 323-331, 1988

    40 Paris, S. G.,, "How metacognition can promote academic learning and instruction. In B. F. Jones & L. Idol (Eds.) Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction" Erlbaum. 15-51, 1990

    41 In P, "Holding in the bottom An interactive approach to the language problems of second language readers Interactive approaches to second language reading" Cambridge University Press 93-100, 1988

    42 Nassaji,H, "Higher-level and lower-level text processing skills in advanced ESL reading comprehension." 86 (86): 261-276, 2003

    43 Pearson, "Handbook of reading research" 815-860, 1991

    44 Aebersold, J. A.,, "From reader to reading teacher: Issues and strategies for second language classrooms." Cambridge University Press 1997

    45 Brown, "Essays in honor of Robert Glaser" & Palincsar k (k): 393-451, 1984

    46 Chin,C, "ESL readers’ perceptions and reading processes: Five case studies." 13 (13): 81-117, 1997a

    47 Devine, "ESL readers’ internalized models of the reading process The question of control" 95-108, 1984

    48 Park,Y.Y, "Development of an instrument for assessing ESL reading strategies." 5 (5): 231-254, 1998

    49 Cotterall,S, "Developing reading strategies through small group interaction" 21 (21): 55-59, 1990

    50 Horiba, Y, "Comprehension processes in L2 reading: Language competence, textual coherence and inferences." 18 : 403-432, 1996

    51 Alexander, "Coming to terms How researchers in learning and literacy talk about knowledge Review of Educational Research" 315-343, 1991

    52 Stanovich, "Changing models of reading and reading acquisition Learning to read" 199119-31

    53 Gershon, S., "Black, white, and read all over." 2003

    54 Song,H.S, "A study of the teaching of reading English as a foreign language in Korea" 55 (55): 367-388, 2000

    55 Song,H.S, "A study of Korean college freshmen readers of English: How they interact with an authentic English text." 14 (14): 1998-, 1998

    56 Phillips,V, "A look at learner strategy use and ESL proficiency" 4 (4): 57-67, 1991

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.75 0.75 0.77
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.7 0.68 1.275 0.18
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼