RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    국가 교육과정 개정 담론의 비교 분석(1): 제 4차에서 제 7차에 걸친 교육내용의 적정화 담론을 중심으로 = A Comparative Study on the Reduction Discourses of Educational Content in the 4th to 7th National Curriculum R & D Reports

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A40116082

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study is to analyze comparatively the reduction discourses of educational content of the 4th, 5th, 6th and 7th national curriculum R & D reports and to suggest some directions for the future curriculum R & D efforts. Indeed, reduction discourses of educational content has been reappeared each time of national curriculum revision as one of important curriculum reform guidelines for the past 20 years in Korea. First, in this study, the researcher tried to summarize the characteristics of reduction discourses of educational content from the four different national curriculum R & D reports. Second, the researcher tried to identify changing tendencies of the reduction policies of educational content during the four-revision period and to infer from the comparative analysis some directions for future policies for the reduction discourses of educational content. Second, on the basis of the research findings, the researcher suggested that firstly the specific guidelines rather than general ones for the reduction of educational content should be provided, that secondly the task of educational content reduction should be deliberated on by both general curricularists and subject specialists together, that thirdly need assessments for the reduction of educational content should be periodically implemented to the parents and students. Lastly, the researcher ended with the strong recommendation that, unlike the past efforts where the R & D participants tried to reduce the necessary subjects students must take per semester and core content for all students on the national level, new efforts should be made in order to give the school more latitude to provide selective subjects and content areas on the one hand and to provide students the right to choose the subjects and content areas on the other hand for the direction of curriculum diversification and relevance.
    번역하기

    This study is to analyze comparatively the reduction discourses of educational content of the 4th, 5th, 6th and 7th national curriculum R & D reports and to suggest some directions for the future curriculum R & D efforts. Indeed, reduction discourses ...

    This study is to analyze comparatively the reduction discourses of educational content of the 4th, 5th, 6th and 7th national curriculum R & D reports and to suggest some directions for the future curriculum R & D efforts. Indeed, reduction discourses of educational content has been reappeared each time of national curriculum revision as one of important curriculum reform guidelines for the past 20 years in Korea. First, in this study, the researcher tried to summarize the characteristics of reduction discourses of educational content from the four different national curriculum R & D reports. Second, the researcher tried to identify changing tendencies of the reduction policies of educational content during the four-revision period and to infer from the comparative analysis some directions for future policies for the reduction discourses of educational content. Second, on the basis of the research findings, the researcher suggested that firstly the specific guidelines rather than general ones for the reduction of educational content should be provided, that secondly the task of educational content reduction should be deliberated on by both general curricularists and subject specialists together, that thirdly need assessments for the reduction of educational content should be periodically implemented to the parents and students. Lastly, the researcher ended with the strong recommendation that, unlike the past efforts where the R & D participants tried to reduce the necessary subjects students must take per semester and core content for all students on the national level, new efforts should be made in order to give the school more latitude to provide selective subjects and content areas on the one hand and to provide students the right to choose the subjects and content areas on the other hand for the direction of curriculum diversification and relevance.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2005-05-31 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> The Journal of Curriculum Studies KCI등재후보
    2005-01-01 등재 신청제한 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2001-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 2.81 2.81 2.75
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    2.65 2.69 3.561 0.48
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼