RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      '지혜'의 개념과 과학교사들의 '지혜'에 대한 인식 = The Concept of 'Wisdom' and Its Perception According to a Survey of Science Teachers

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103629410

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study is a part of our research project that considers 'Science as Wisdom (SaW)' as a new approach to science education. We presented a review of previous studies on wisdom from relevant areas as philosophy, psychology and education, and drew a few educational meanings. We also conducted a survey of science teachers' perception of wisdom to obtain implications for a follow-up study. The survey was conducted on pre-service science teachers, in-service science teachers, and teachers of other subjects. The results of this study are as follows: First, all three groups of participants perceive 'practical' domain of wisdom as most important while 'interpersonal' domain was perceived as least important. Second, all three groups of participants perceive that 'to catch what the most important problem is,' is the most important among 20 elements of wisdom. Third, when participants were asked about the 'wise people around them', the interpersonal domain followed as the second most frequent response after the 'practical' domain, which was in contrast to our first finding above. Fourth, about 80% of all participants answered that wisdom can be cultivated through school education. Finally, answers to the question asking the scientific concepts related to wisdom were categorized into four types as follows: (1) the wisdom required to understand and apply scientific knowledge, (2) the wisdom included in the meaning of scientific knowledge, (3) the wisdom needed to discover scientific knowledge, (4) the wisdom that can be developed through scientific activities.
      번역하기

      This study is a part of our research project that considers 'Science as Wisdom (SaW)' as a new approach to science education. We presented a review of previous studies on wisdom from relevant areas as philosophy, psychology and education, and drew a f...

      This study is a part of our research project that considers 'Science as Wisdom (SaW)' as a new approach to science education. We presented a review of previous studies on wisdom from relevant areas as philosophy, psychology and education, and drew a few educational meanings. We also conducted a survey of science teachers' perception of wisdom to obtain implications for a follow-up study. The survey was conducted on pre-service science teachers, in-service science teachers, and teachers of other subjects. The results of this study are as follows: First, all three groups of participants perceive 'practical' domain of wisdom as most important while 'interpersonal' domain was perceived as least important. Second, all three groups of participants perceive that 'to catch what the most important problem is,' is the most important among 20 elements of wisdom. Third, when participants were asked about the 'wise people around them', the interpersonal domain followed as the second most frequent response after the 'practical' domain, which was in contrast to our first finding above. Fourth, about 80% of all participants answered that wisdom can be cultivated through school education. Finally, answers to the question asking the scientific concepts related to wisdom were categorized into four types as follows: (1) the wisdom required to understand and apply scientific knowledge, (2) the wisdom included in the meaning of scientific knowledge, (3) the wisdom needed to discover scientific knowledge, (4) the wisdom that can be developed through scientific activities.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 소연희, "초등학생의 학업탄력성과 지혜의 관계: 4학년과 6학년 비교" 한국교육방법학회 26 (26): 323-345, 2014

      2 정성배, "초등학교 교사의 지혜와 직무만족도의 관계: 분산적 지도성과 교사효능감의 중다매개효과" 한국초등교육학회 27 (27): 369-390, 2014

      3 전병옥, "초등 영재아동을 위한 자기보고식 ‘지혜’ 척도 개발" 한국영재학회 22 (22): 427-450, 2012

      4 김종욱, "지식에서 지혜로: 지식기반사회에 대한 불교적 성찰" 대한철학회 99 : 109-132, 2006

      5 이종성, "장자철학의 지혜와 현대적 의의" 한국동서철학회 (64) : 129-153, 2012

      6 김영민, "잘 알려진 창의적 과학자들의 과학적 문제 발견 패턴 분석" 한국과학교육학회 33 (33): 1285-1299, 2013

      7 Hong, S., "과학은 얼마나" Seoul National University Press 2004

      8 채유정, "과학영재학생들이 지각하는 부모의 양육행동, 자아존중감 및 정서지능에 관한 연구" 한국과학교육학회 33 (33): 695-707, 2013

      9 이기흥, "‘지혜’ 규정을 위한 소고 —지식기반 시대에서 지혜의 변호를 위하여" 인문학연구원 (41) : 485-516, 2011

      10 Pan, S., "‘Know thyself’ und phronesis" 54 : 51-88, 2012

      1 소연희, "초등학생의 학업탄력성과 지혜의 관계: 4학년과 6학년 비교" 한국교육방법학회 26 (26): 323-345, 2014

      2 정성배, "초등학교 교사의 지혜와 직무만족도의 관계: 분산적 지도성과 교사효능감의 중다매개효과" 한국초등교육학회 27 (27): 369-390, 2014

      3 전병옥, "초등 영재아동을 위한 자기보고식 ‘지혜’ 척도 개발" 한국영재학회 22 (22): 427-450, 2012

      4 김종욱, "지식에서 지혜로: 지식기반사회에 대한 불교적 성찰" 대한철학회 99 : 109-132, 2006

      5 이종성, "장자철학의 지혜와 현대적 의의" 한국동서철학회 (64) : 129-153, 2012

      6 김영민, "잘 알려진 창의적 과학자들의 과학적 문제 발견 패턴 분석" 한국과학교육학회 33 (33): 1285-1299, 2013

      7 Hong, S., "과학은 얼마나" Seoul National University Press 2004

      8 채유정, "과학영재학생들이 지각하는 부모의 양육행동, 자아존중감 및 정서지능에 관한 연구" 한국과학교육학회 33 (33): 695-707, 2013

      9 이기흥, "‘지혜’ 규정을 위한 소고 —지식기반 시대에서 지혜의 변호를 위하여" 인문학연구원 (41) : 485-516, 2011

      10 Pan, S., "‘Know thyself’ und phronesis" 54 : 51-88, 2012

      11 Jinwoong song, "Yet Another Paradigm Shift?:From Minds-on Herts-on" 한국과학교육학회 24 (24): 129-145, 2004

      12 Kitchener, K. S., "Wisdom:Its nature, origins, and development" Cambridge University Press 212-229, 1990

      13 Csikszentmihalyi, M., "Wisdom: Its nature, origins, and development" Cambridge University Press 25-51, 1990

      14 Chandler, M. J., "Wisdom: Its nature, origins, and development" Cambridge University Press 121-141, 1990

      15 Birren, J. E., "Wisdom: Its nature, origins, and development" Cambridge University Press 317-332, 1990

      16 Baltes, P. B., "Wisdom: Its nature, origins, and development" Cambridge University Press 87-120, 1990

      17 Arlin, P. K., "Wisdom: Its nature, origins, and development" Cambridge University Press 230-243, 1990

      18 Sternberg, R. J., "Wisdom: Its nature, origins, and development" Cambridge University Press 142-159, 1990

      19 Robinson, D. N., "Wisdom: Its nature, origins, and development" Cambridge University Press 13-24, 1990

      20 Pascual-Leone, J., "Wisdom: Its nature, origins, and development" Cambridge University Press 244-278, 1990

      21 Orwoll, L., "Wisdom: Its nature, origins, and development" Cambridge University Press 160-177, 1990

      22 Meacham, J. A., "Wisdom: Its nature, origins, and development" Cambridge University Press 181-211, 1990

      23 Labouvie-Vief, G., "Wisdom: Its nature, origins, and development" Cambridge University Press 52-83, 1990

      24 Kramer, D. A., "Wisdom: Its nature, origins, and development" Cambridge University Press 279-313, 1990

      25 Kunzmann, U., "Wisdom-related knowledge : affective, motivational, and interpersonal correlates" 29 (29): 1104-1119, 2003

      26 Smith, J., "Wisdom-related knowledge : Age/cohort differences in response to life-planning problems" 26 : 494-505, 1990

      27 Sternberg, R. J., "Wisdom, intelligence, and creativity synthesized" Cambridge University Press 2003

      28 Baltes, P. B., "Wisdom : A metaheuristic(pragmatic)to orchestrate mind and virtue toward excellence" 55 (55): 122-136, 2000

      29 Sanders, J. D., "The scientific study of personal wisdom" Springer 99-112, 2013

      30 Kim, S., "The concept of wisdom and its development" 42 : 1-26, 2010

      31 Song, J., "The Korean Association for Science Education: The future of science education: International perspective" The Korean Association for Science Education 40-49, 2016

      32 Ministry of Education, "The 2015 revised science curriculum"

      33 MEST., "The 2009 revised science curriculum"

      34 MEST., "The 2007 revised science curriculum"

      35 Reeve, R., "Teaching for wisdom" Springer 79-92, 2008

      36 Sternberg, R. J., "Teaching for wisdom" Springer 37-58, 2008

      37 Ferrari, M., "Teaching for wisdom" Can either be taught in public school? In M. Ferrari & G. Potworowski(Eds. ), Teaching for wisdom(pp. 207-222). Springer 207-222, 2008

      38 Pasupathi, M., "Seeds of wisdom : Adolescents’ knowledge and judgment about difficult life problems" 37 (37): 351-361, 2001

      39 "Oxford english dictionary" Oxford University Press

      40 Assmann, A., "Life-span development and behavior" Erlbaum 186-224, 1994

      41 Clayton, V. P., "Life-span development and behavior" Academic Press 103-135, 1980

      42 Baltes, P. B., "Life-span development and behavior" Academic Press 33-76, 1984

      43 Cho, K., "Knowledge-based society and educational tasks" 32 (32): 1-21, 2001

      44 Garret, R., "Knowledge, teaching and wisdom" Kluwer Academic 221-232, 1996

      45 Norman, A. P., "Knowledge, teaching and wisdom" Kluwer Academic 253-266, 1996

      46 Ryan, S., "Knowledge, teaching and wisdom" Kluwer Academic 233-242, 1996

      47 Sternberg, R. J., "Implicit theories of intelligence, creativity, and wisdom" 49 : 607-627, 1986

      48 Csikszentmihalyi, M., "Handbook of wisdom" Cambridge University Press 220-242, 2005

      49 Sternberg R. J., "Handbook of creativity" Cambridge University Press 3-15, 1999

      50 Ardelt, M., "Empirical Assessment of a Three-Dimensional Wisdom Scale" 25 (25): 275-324, 2003

      51 Claxton, G., "Creativity, wisdom, and trusteeship" Corwin Press 168-176, 2008

      52 Craft, A., "Creativity, wisdom, and trusteeship" Corwin Press 1-14, 2008

      53 Simonton, D. K., "Creativity, wisdom, and trusteeship" Corwin Press 68-76, 2008

      54 Rowson, J., "Creativity, wisdom, and trusteeship" Corwin Press 84-95, 2008

      55 Trotman, D., "Creativity, wisdom, and trusteeship" Corwin Press 158-166, 2008

      56 Staudinger, U. M., "Correlates of wisdom-related performance in adolescence and adulthood : Age-graded differences in"paths"towards desirable development" 13 : 239-268, 2003

      57 Garret, R., "Contemporary issues in behavior therapy:Improving the human condition" Springer 403-420, 1996

      58 Yang, S., "Conceptions of wisdom among Taiwanese Chinese" 32 (32): 662-680, 2001

      59 박장호, "Aristoteles의 실천적 지혜와 도덕교육" 한국윤리교육학회 (6) : 147-182, 2004

      60 National Institute of Korean Language, "A standard korean dictionary"

      61 Richardson, M. J., "A handbook of wisdom" Cambridge University Press 139-159, 2005

      62 Kupperman, J, J., "A handbook of wisdom" Cambridge University Press 245-271, 2005

      63 Takahashi, M., "A handbook of wisdom" Cambridge University Press 32-60, 2005

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-03-29 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Journal of the Korean Association for in Science Education -> Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-04-26 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education -> Journal of the Korean Association for in Science Education KCI등재
      2007-04-03 학회명변경 영문명 : The Korean Association For Research In Science Education -> The Korean Association for Science Education KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2002-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.87 1.87 1.69
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.66 1.54 2.133 0.47
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼