RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    사업손실의 권리구제에 관한 고찰 = A Study on the Relief of Right for Project Loss

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76443200

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      "Project losses" refer to losses incurred outside of the project site area after implementation or completion of a public project. It was understood before that only losses that directly resulted from public uses would be compensated. Therefore, project losses (i.e. losses, such as obstruction of sunshine/scenery, noise, vibration, dust, drying up of water, etc., are treated differently from compensation for taking land and other direct losses) were not traditionally eligible for compensation in principle.<BR>  In public projects today, aside from direct infringement of rights from taking of properties, the number of complaints filed not for compensation for direct losses but for project losses that are more indirect losses/damages from execution public projects on the rise.<BR>  However, regulations only provide for compensation for land taking and other such direct losses and there are no regulations thatprovide for losses incurred outside of project sites in spite of clear material damages to properties. In the absence of these regulations, such losses/damages are rarely properly compensated.<BR>  Disputes between people and project executors occur frequently because of this and often leads to long delays in public projects. Even when damages/losses are compensated, there is no consistency in compensation owing to the different regulations applied by the project executors.<BR>  In view of the recent developments, the conclusion that is reached is that there are no actual benefits to be gained from deciding whether losses are within the scope of compensation for losses or for damages. For efficient remedy of the victim"s rights resulting from project losses, it would be more useful and advantageous to include them in the scope of compensation for losses.<BR>  For these reasons, consideration should be given to compensations before damage has occurred when losses from a project are clearly anticipated in order to ensure smooth execution of public projects and efficient remedies of infringement to property rights.<BR>  There needs to be consistent regulations or rules on compensations to reduce burden on officials in charge of compensation and to ensure consistency in compensated amounts. In addition, scopes and standards of compensation for losses outside of the project area needs to be established before the said tasks can be undertaken.
    번역하기

      "Project losses" refer to losses incurred outside of the project site area after implementation or completion of a public project. It was understood before that only losses that directly resulted from public uses would be compensated. Ther...

      "Project losses" refer to losses incurred outside of the project site area after implementation or completion of a public project. It was understood before that only losses that directly resulted from public uses would be compensated. Therefore, project losses (i.e. losses, such as obstruction of sunshine/scenery, noise, vibration, dust, drying up of water, etc., are treated differently from compensation for taking land and other direct losses) were not traditionally eligible for compensation in principle.<BR>  In public projects today, aside from direct infringement of rights from taking of properties, the number of complaints filed not for compensation for direct losses but for project losses that are more indirect losses/damages from execution public projects on the rise.<BR>  However, regulations only provide for compensation for land taking and other such direct losses and there are no regulations thatprovide for losses incurred outside of project sites in spite of clear material damages to properties. In the absence of these regulations, such losses/damages are rarely properly compensated.<BR>  Disputes between people and project executors occur frequently because of this and often leads to long delays in public projects. Even when damages/losses are compensated, there is no consistency in compensation owing to the different regulations applied by the project executors.<BR>  In view of the recent developments, the conclusion that is reached is that there are no actual benefits to be gained from deciding whether losses are within the scope of compensation for losses or for damages. For efficient remedy of the victim"s rights resulting from project losses, it would be more useful and advantageous to include them in the scope of compensation for losses.<BR>  For these reasons, consideration should be given to compensations before damage has occurred when losses from a project are clearly anticipated in order to ensure smooth execution of public projects and efficient remedies of infringement to property rights.<BR>  There needs to be consistent regulations or rules on compensations to reduce burden on officials in charge of compensation and to ensure consistency in compensated amounts. In addition, scopes and standards of compensation for losses outside of the project area needs to be established before the said tasks can be undertaken.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Abstract
      Ⅰ. 서론
      Ⅱ. 사업손실보상의 개요
      Ⅲ. 현행 사업손실 보상제도
      Ⅳ. 사업손실보상의 권리구제와 평가
      Ⅴ. 결론
      참고문헌
    • Abstract
      Ⅰ. 서론
      Ⅱ. 사업손실보상의 개요
      Ⅲ. 현행 사업손실 보상제도
      Ⅳ. 사업손실보상의 권리구제와 평가
      Ⅴ. 결론
      참고문헌
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼