RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      태허의 인간불교와 용성의 대각 운동의 비교 연구 = A Comparative Studies on both Human-centeredBuddhism of Ven. Tai-xu and The Greatenlightenment Movement of Ven. Yong-seung

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82603152

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      We normally address the one who lead the changes, `The Enlightened one` Ven. Tai-xu of China and Ven. Yong-seung of Korea are the one who lived the lire of `The enlightened`. Fortunately the teachings which they both advocated and practiced had been preserved till today. Looking at it from this contemporary point of view, it seems so abundant in providing us preparing for the future and induce changes in the present era. The major activity that they both represent are `The Buddha`s Institute` and `The Great Enlightenment movements`. Many researchers showed interests and carried out researches on both movenrnts and its products are meaningful. However, those merely focus on the life and their activity, which resulted in lacking comparison of the two. Therefore, I focused on the comparison of the two movements and I came to the following conclusion Firstly, they both were faithful to the strict precepts according to renunciation, and no doubt at all that they both walked the right path in keepingthe precepts. Secondly, the both showed the ideas that the Sanghaha needed changes. Thirdly, they both proclaimed and clearly written out the suggestions that needs reforms, and both lived the lifein accordance with it. Forthly, they both faced the reality and excelled in preparing for the future, actual practice and doing researches. Fifthly, the both had disciple who maintained and preserved the spirit of the movement till today. Sixthly, the spirit of the two still alive today and there seems no expiration.
      번역하기

      We normally address the one who lead the changes, `The Enlightened one` Ven. Tai-xu of China and Ven. Yong-seung of Korea are the one who lived the lire of `The enlightened`. Fortunately the teachings which they both advocated and practiced had been p...

      We normally address the one who lead the changes, `The Enlightened one` Ven. Tai-xu of China and Ven. Yong-seung of Korea are the one who lived the lire of `The enlightened`. Fortunately the teachings which they both advocated and practiced had been preserved till today. Looking at it from this contemporary point of view, it seems so abundant in providing us preparing for the future and induce changes in the present era. The major activity that they both represent are `The Buddha`s Institute` and `The Great Enlightenment movements`. Many researchers showed interests and carried out researches on both movenrnts and its products are meaningful. However, those merely focus on the life and their activity, which resulted in lacking comparison of the two. Therefore, I focused on the comparison of the two movements and I came to the following conclusion Firstly, they both were faithful to the strict precepts according to renunciation, and no doubt at all that they both walked the right path in keepingthe precepts. Secondly, the both showed the ideas that the Sanghaha needed changes. Thirdly, they both proclaimed and clearly written out the suggestions that needs reforms, and both lived the lifein accordance with it. Forthly, they both faced the reality and excelled in preparing for the future, actual practice and doing researches. Fifthly, the both had disciple who maintained and preserved the spirit of the movement till today. Sixthly, the spirit of the two still alive today and there seems no expiration.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 한보광, "龍城스님의 후반기의 생애(2)" 9-74, 2001

      2 한보광, "龍城스님의 후반기의 생애(1)" 9-64, 2000

      3 金泰洽, "龍城禪師語錄 上·下" 1951

      4 韓普光, "龍城禪師硏究" 甘露堂 1981

      5 김광식, "한국현대불교사연구" 불교시대사 2006

      6 양정연, "태허 불교개혁운동의 실천원리와 전개" 한국선학회 (20) : 459-494, 2008

      7 김연재, "중국근대의 민족불교에 있어서 護國論의 대두와 그 성격" 불교문화연구원 45 : 81-107, 2006

      8 김영진, "중국 근대사상과 불교" 그린비 2007

      9 김광식, "용성" 민족사 1999

      10 김광식, "백용성의 불교개혁과 대각교 운동" 65-98, 2000

      1 한보광, "龍城스님의 후반기의 생애(2)" 9-74, 2001

      2 한보광, "龍城스님의 후반기의 생애(1)" 9-64, 2000

      3 金泰洽, "龍城禪師語錄 上·下" 1951

      4 韓普光, "龍城禪師硏究" 甘露堂 1981

      5 김광식, "한국현대불교사연구" 불교시대사 2006

      6 양정연, "태허 불교개혁운동의 실천원리와 전개" 한국선학회 (20) : 459-494, 2008

      7 김연재, "중국근대의 민족불교에 있어서 護國論의 대두와 그 성격" 불교문화연구원 45 : 81-107, 2006

      8 김영진, "중국 근대사상과 불교" 그린비 2007

      9 김광식, "용성" 민족사 1999

      10 김광식, "백용성의 불교개혁과 대각교 운동" 65-98, 2000

      11 김광식, "백용성스님과 일제하의 사찰재산" 147-188, 2001

      12 이정수, "근대 중국불교의 태동과 자각" 불교문화연구원 (49) : 261-278, 2008

      13 劉成有, "近現代居士佛學硏究" 巴蜀書社 2002

      14 李遠傑, "近現代以佛攝儒硏究" 巴蜀書社 2002

      15 高振農, "近現代中國佛敎論" 中國社會佛學出版社 2002

      16 鄭珖鎬, "近代韓日佛敎關係史硏究" 인하대학교출판부 1994

      17 鄧子美, "超越與順應" 中國社會佛學出版社 2004

      18 白龍城, "覺海日輪" 大衆佛敎 獎學會刊 1979

      19 김진무, "淸末 廟産興學과 근대불교학의 부흥" 불교문화연구원 45 : 67-80, 2006

      20 李向平, "救世與求心" 上海人民出版社 1993

      21 洪啓嵩黃啓霖, "太虛文集" 文殊出版社 1987

      22 羅同兵, "太虛對中國佛敎現代化道路的抉擇" 巴蜀書社 2003

      23 印順, "太虛大師年譜" 正聞出版社 2000

      24 太虛, "太虛大師全書" 善導寺佛經流通處 1998

      25 李明友, "太虛及其人間佛敎" 浙江人民出版社 2000

      26 元弼聖, "太虛,印順의 중국불교 개혁사상과 悔堂思想" 119-152, 2002

      27 白相奎, "大覺敎旨趣 in : 修心論" 大覺敎中央本部 1936

      28 高振農, "佛敎文化與近代中國" 上海社會科學院出版社 1992

      29 陳兵鄧子美, "二十世紀中國佛敎" 民族出版社 2000

      30 何玆全, "中國歷代名僧" 河南人民出版社 1995

      31 郭朋, "中國近代佛學思想史稿" 巴蜀書社 1989

      32 이정수, "中國近代 佛學院의 설립과 그 영향 -武昌佛學院을 중심으로-" 한국선학회 (20) : 275-310, 2008

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-02-11 학회명변경 영문명 : The Learned Society of the Korean Culture -> The Association for Korean Cultural Studies KCI등재
      2010-02-11 학술지명변경 외국어명 : THE Korean Culture Journal -> The Review of Korean Cultural Studies KCI등재
      2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2007-07-02 학술지명변경 외국어명 : A study of Han Min Jok's culture -> THE Korean Culture Journal KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2005-06-16 학회명변경 영문명 : The Learned Society Of Han-Min-Jok'S Culture -> The Learned Society of the Korean Culture KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.6 0.6 0.57
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.59 0.59 1.042 0.14
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼