RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCIE SCOPUS

      Enhancement of CO2 desorption using ultrasound and vacuum in water scrubbing biogas upgrading system

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107228956

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Ultrasound and vacuum were respectively employed to enhance CO2 desorption in a water scrubbing biogas upgrading system. Results showed that incomplete CO2 desorption could cause a high CO2 content in the water and seriously affect the purity of the product gas. Vacuum had a strong enhancement effect on CO2 desorption. When a vacuum of 0.04MPa was used to enhance CO2 desorption, the amount of the stripping air could be reduced to 1/16- th of that without enhancement, indicating that vacuum could greatly enhance CO2 desorption and significantly decrease the amount of the stripping air, which was expected to reduce a large amount of energy consumption. In contrast, the enhancement effect of ultrasound was not so obvious for CO2 desorption in the desorption column with air stripping, since the solution could be well desorbed by gas stripping, though ultrasound could strongly affect the static CO2 desorption.
      번역하기

      Ultrasound and vacuum were respectively employed to enhance CO2 desorption in a water scrubbing biogas upgrading system. Results showed that incomplete CO2 desorption could cause a high CO2 content in the water and seriously affect the purity of the p...

      Ultrasound and vacuum were respectively employed to enhance CO2 desorption in a water scrubbing biogas upgrading system. Results showed that incomplete CO2 desorption could cause a high CO2 content in the water and seriously affect the purity of the product gas. Vacuum had a strong enhancement effect on CO2 desorption. When a vacuum of 0.04MPa was used to enhance CO2 desorption, the amount of the stripping air could be reduced to 1/16- th of that without enhancement, indicating that vacuum could greatly enhance CO2 desorption and significantly decrease the amount of the stripping air, which was expected to reduce a large amount of energy consumption. In contrast, the enhancement effect of ultrasound was not so obvious for CO2 desorption in the desorption column with air stripping, since the solution could be well desorbed by gas stripping, though ultrasound could strongly affect the static CO2 desorption.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 P. Collet, 192 : 282-, 2017

      2 J. Ying, 173 : 218-, 2019

      3 A. Kokkoli, 247 : 380-, 2018

      4 X. Chen, 7 : 30-, 2012

      5 F. Zhen, 11 : 103-, 2012

      6 S. Yan, 85 : 125-, 2014

      7 I. Angelidaki, 36 : 452-, 2018

      8 R. Kapoor, 7 : 100251-, 2019

      9 R. Kapoor, 208 : 1379-, 2017

      10 J. J. Carroll, 20 : 1201-, 1991

      1 P. Collet, 192 : 282-, 2017

      2 J. Ying, 173 : 218-, 2019

      3 A. Kokkoli, 247 : 380-, 2018

      4 X. Chen, 7 : 30-, 2012

      5 F. Zhen, 11 : 103-, 2012

      6 S. Yan, 85 : 125-, 2014

      7 I. Angelidaki, 36 : 452-, 2018

      8 R. Kapoor, 7 : 100251-, 2019

      9 R. Kapoor, 208 : 1379-, 2017

      10 J. J. Carroll, 20 : 1201-, 1991

      11 R. Muñoz, 14 : 727-, 2015

      12 J. Niesner, 35 : 517-, 2013

      13 S. Rasi, 115 : 539-, 2014

      14 S. Sahota, 1 : 79-, 2018

      15 C. E. Wylock, 170 : 639-, 2017

      16 E. Ryckebosch, 35 : 1633-, 2011

      17 J. Läntelä, 92 : 307-, 2012

      18 S. A. Hosseinipour, 130 : 641-, 2019

      19 F. Jin, 34 : 1720-, 2016

      20 K. Starr, 32 : 991-, 2012

      21 T. Patterson, 39 : 1806-, 2011

      22 G. Zheng, 17 : 1-, 2013

      23 J. Ying, 163 : 168-, 2018

      24 G. Han, 338 : 269-, 2013

      25 C. Feng, 29 : 93-, 2016

      26 Q. Kong, 31 (31): 90-, 2011

      27 F. Jin, 33 (33): 803-, 2014

      28 D. Benizri, 219 : 169-, 2019

      29 P. Rotunno, 102 : 417-, 2017

      30 C. Pétrier, 4 : 295-, 1997

      31 J. Xue, 6 : 42-, 2006

      32 J. Xue, 15 : 486-, 2007

      33 J. Ying, 63 : 781-, 2014

      34 Z. Wang, 93 : 238-, 2013

      35 M. Fang, 9 : 507-, 2012

      36 C. zhang, 3 : 16-, 1982

      37 "The geology and mineral industry standard of P. R. China"

      38 C. Feng, "Research of enhancing CO2 desorption from crude oil of CO2 flooding by ultrasound" China University of Petroleum 2017

      39 F. Jin, "Chinese Patent, 2017,104,278,132"

      40 W. Huang, "Chinese Patent, 2011,201,949,557"

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2016-06-21 학술지명변경 한글명 : The Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering -> Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering
      외국어명 : The Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering -> Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering
      KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-09-27 학회명변경 영문명 : The Korean Institute Of Chemical Engineers -> The Korean Institute of Chemical Engineers KCI등재
      2007-09-03 학술지명변경 한글명 : The Korean Journal of Chemical Engineeri -> The Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering
      외국어명 : The Korean Journal of Chemical Engineeri -> The Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering
      KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2002-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.92 0.72 1.4
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.15 0.94 0.403 0.14
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼