RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      헬스케어 AI 윤리에서 환자·시민 참여 모형: 주제범위 고찰과 방법론적 검토에 기초하여 = Patient and Public Involvement Model in Healthcare AI Ethics: Based on Scoping Review and Methodological Reflections

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109540121

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      To apply healthcare AI ethics in clinical and research settings, self-regulatory frameworks emphasize the necessity of external validation. Building on theoretical discussions that justify patients and the public as key actors in this validation process, this article conducts a scoping review on patient and public involvement (PPI) in healthcare AI and proposes a model for their engagement. A search was conducted in academic databases using the keywords “AI” and “patient and public involvement.” Out of the 114 studies that were identified, 16 were selected for review; the selected studies consisted of four scoping reviews, eight empirical studies, and four theoretical papers. The review confirmed ongoing discussions on PPI in healthcare AI, but highlighted the lack of detailed implementation strategies. This article suggests participatory design, healthcare AI literacy, and citizen science models as potential approaches for engagement, discussing their possibilities and limitations.
      번역하기

      To apply healthcare AI ethics in clinical and research settings, self-regulatory frameworks emphasize the necessity of external validation. Building on theoretical discussions that justify patients and the public as key actors in this validation proce...

      To apply healthcare AI ethics in clinical and research settings, self-regulatory frameworks emphasize the necessity of external validation. Building on theoretical discussions that justify patients and the public as key actors in this validation process, this article conducts a scoping review on patient and public involvement (PPI) in healthcare AI and proposes a model for their engagement. A search was conducted in academic databases using the keywords “AI” and “patient and public involvement.” Out of the 114 studies that were identified, 16 were selected for review; the selected studies consisted of four scoping reviews, eight empirical studies, and four theoretical papers. The review confirmed ongoing discussions on PPI in healthcare AI, but highlighted the lack of detailed implementation strategies. This article suggests participatory design, healthcare AI literacy, and citizen science models as potential approaches for engagement, discussing their possibilities and limitations.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼