RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    『매천야록』에 나타난 황현의 역사인식 = Hwang Hyun's Historical View Suggested in Maecheonyarok

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104574372

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Hwang Hyun wrote Maecheonyarok recording the contradictions and demise of Chosun Dynasty. Though there are several opinions on his historical view expressed in this book, these opinions have not paid a comprehensive attention to the changes and characteristics of his view. Referring to the achievements of existing studies, this paper traces the variation of his historical view on the contradictions of the dynastic system and the aggression of Japanese imperialism in the changing historical conditions.
    Hwang Hyun consistently and correctly criticized the tyranny and corruption of the royal family and kin group. Especially he made a harsh criticism on Emperor Gojong and Empress Min for their incompetency and corruption, though he expressed relatively favorable opinions on Heungseon Daewongun. Thus we can understand that he regarded the establishment of dynastic order as the most important. He also made severe criticism on the corruption of officials and the social and economic confusion. He viewed that the incompetency and misgovernment by Emperor Gojong and the ruling group intensified the contradictions of the dynastic system and became the direct and fundamental source of the loss of sovereignty.
    But he expressed a negative view on the people's movement that denied the legitimacy of Chosun Dynasty. Though he recognized the contradictions of the Dynasty as the origin of the popular uprising, he defined the uprising as a rebellious action that denied the ruling order. And he showed the limits of failing to suggest a modern view of the state that puts people at the center. Thus we can see that he regarded the protection of the dynastic order as more urgent than the deterrence of the strong powers’ aggression.
    Hwang Hyun concentrated his efforts on revealing Japanese aggressiveness that seized the sovereignty of Chosun Dynasty. He followed the Chinese world view on the nature of Japan up to 1894 but he recognized Japan’s aggressive ambition thereafter. Especially he realized Japan’s aggressive nature after the Russo-Japanese War and made harsh criticism of Japanese seizure of the sovereignty of Chosun Dynasty. This is revealed by his favorable writings on the struggle against Japan conducted by the people of all status, class, and nationality.
    It seems that Hwang Hyun blamed the incompetency and misgovernment of officials and the people’s senselessness without recognizing the nature of the Japanese economic aggression by 1894. However, after the Sino-Japanese War he began to understand the essence and evil effects of Japanese economic invasion and raised his criticism of the invasion while paying more attention to people’s resistance. He also made precise records and criticism on the seizure of cultural assets and the cultural policy by imperial Japan.
    Hwang Hyun understood the contradictions of the dynastic system and the aggression of Japanese imperialism as the main cause for the demise of the state. This year marks the 100th anniversary of Japanese Compulsory Occupation of Korea. We can get many suggestions from his understanding on the loss of sovereignty that the comprehensive incompetency and misgovernment of the ruling group including Emperor Gojong provided the cause, in addition to the forced aggression by Japan and the betrayal of a small group of pro-Japanese officials.
    번역하기

    Hwang Hyun wrote Maecheonyarok recording the contradictions and demise of Chosun Dynasty. Though there are several opinions on his historical view expressed in this book, these opinions have not paid a comprehensive attention to the changes and charac...

    Hwang Hyun wrote Maecheonyarok recording the contradictions and demise of Chosun Dynasty. Though there are several opinions on his historical view expressed in this book, these opinions have not paid a comprehensive attention to the changes and characteristics of his view. Referring to the achievements of existing studies, this paper traces the variation of his historical view on the contradictions of the dynastic system and the aggression of Japanese imperialism in the changing historical conditions.
    Hwang Hyun consistently and correctly criticized the tyranny and corruption of the royal family and kin group. Especially he made a harsh criticism on Emperor Gojong and Empress Min for their incompetency and corruption, though he expressed relatively favorable opinions on Heungseon Daewongun. Thus we can understand that he regarded the establishment of dynastic order as the most important. He also made severe criticism on the corruption of officials and the social and economic confusion. He viewed that the incompetency and misgovernment by Emperor Gojong and the ruling group intensified the contradictions of the dynastic system and became the direct and fundamental source of the loss of sovereignty.
    But he expressed a negative view on the people's movement that denied the legitimacy of Chosun Dynasty. Though he recognized the contradictions of the Dynasty as the origin of the popular uprising, he defined the uprising as a rebellious action that denied the ruling order. And he showed the limits of failing to suggest a modern view of the state that puts people at the center. Thus we can see that he regarded the protection of the dynastic order as more urgent than the deterrence of the strong powers’ aggression.
    Hwang Hyun concentrated his efforts on revealing Japanese aggressiveness that seized the sovereignty of Chosun Dynasty. He followed the Chinese world view on the nature of Japan up to 1894 but he recognized Japan’s aggressive ambition thereafter. Especially he realized Japan’s aggressive nature after the Russo-Japanese War and made harsh criticism of Japanese seizure of the sovereignty of Chosun Dynasty. This is revealed by his favorable writings on the struggle against Japan conducted by the people of all status, class, and nationality.
    It seems that Hwang Hyun blamed the incompetency and misgovernment of officials and the people’s senselessness without recognizing the nature of the Japanese economic aggression by 1894. However, after the Sino-Japanese War he began to understand the essence and evil effects of Japanese economic invasion and raised his criticism of the invasion while paying more attention to people’s resistance. He also made precise records and criticism on the seizure of cultural assets and the cultural policy by imperial Japan.
    Hwang Hyun understood the contradictions of the dynastic system and the aggression of Japanese imperialism as the main cause for the demise of the state. This year marks the 100th anniversary of Japanese Compulsory Occupation of Korea. We can get many suggestions from his understanding on the loss of sovereignty that the comprehensive incompetency and misgovernment of the ruling group including Emperor Gojong provided the cause, in addition to the forced aggression by Japan and the betrayal of a small group of pro-Japanese officials.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 금병동, "황현의 매천야록 in: 조선인의 일본관 ― 600년 역사 속에 펼쳐진 조선인의 일본인식" 논형 2008

    2 홍영기, "한국의 역사가 ― 황현" (41) : 2007

    3 임형택, "역주 매천야록" 문학과 지성사 2004

    4 허경진, "매천야록" 서해문집 2006

    5 임형택, "매천야록 해제 in: 역주 매천야록" 문학과 지성사 2005

    6 이은철, "매천 황현을 만나다" 심미안 2010

    7 李章熙, "黃玹의 生涯와 思想" 21 : 1978

    8 崔洪奎, "黃玹의 現實認識과 歷史感覺" 17 : 1980

    9 河宇鳳, "黃玹의 歷史意識에 대한 硏究" 6 : 1982

    10 洪以燮, "黃玹의 歷史意識― 韓國近代史學의 推移에서" (27) : 1972

    1 금병동, "황현의 매천야록 in: 조선인의 일본관 ― 600년 역사 속에 펼쳐진 조선인의 일본인식" 논형 2008

    2 홍영기, "한국의 역사가 ― 황현" (41) : 2007

    3 임형택, "역주 매천야록" 문학과 지성사 2004

    4 허경진, "매천야록" 서해문집 2006

    5 임형택, "매천야록 해제 in: 역주 매천야록" 문학과 지성사 2005

    6 이은철, "매천 황현을 만나다" 심미안 2010

    7 李章熙, "黃玹의 生涯와 思想" 21 : 1978

    8 崔洪奎, "黃玹의 現實認識과 歷史感覺" 17 : 1980

    9 河宇鳳, "黃玹의 歷史意識에 대한 硏究" 6 : 1982

    10 洪以燮, "黃玹의 歷史意識― 韓國近代史學의 推移에서" (27) : 1972

    11 洪以燮, "黃玹의 歷史意識― 梅泉野錄 讀解에의 試論" 4 : 1969

    12 黃玹, "黃玹全集" 亞細亞文化社 1978

    13 慎鏞廈, "黃玹全集解題 in 黃玹全集" 亞細亞文化社 1978

    14 白淳在, "開化期의 韓國書誌― 1883~1918年을 中心으로" 11 : 1970

    15 吉恩植, "梅泉黃玹의 開化認識硏究" 3 : 2000

    16 金昌洙, "梅泉黃玹의 民族意識" (33) : 1981

    17 李相寔, "梅泉黃玹의 歷史意識" 8 : 1978

    18 李章熙, "梅泉野錄" 명문당 2008

    19 黃玹, "梅泉野錄" 國史編纂委員會 1955

    20 申奭鎬, "梅泉野錄解說 in 梅泉野錄" 探求堂 1955

    21 金濬, "完譯梅泉野錄" 敎文社 1994

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.66 0.66 0.71
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.65 0.62 1.675 0.11
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼