RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    범주형 환경변수를 고려한 부대성과평가 방법에 관한 연구 - DEA와 CCCA의 결합을 중심으로 - = Performance Evaluation of Military Corps with Categorical Environmental Variables

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101101455

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    There are many occasions that the performance of a corps is influenced not only by its own efforts but by the commander of the next higher unit in a vertical organizational structure. When the direction of the commander in the next higher organization is different from that of the actual evaluation agency, the unit under evaluation may get rated lower than what it should deserve. This study suggests an alternative method to evaluate the performance of military units in the situation that there exist critical environmental factors which affect the performance. This method employes DEA, a non parametric method, and Constrained Canonical Correlation Analysis(CCCA), a parametric method which is used to estimate a efficient frontier with multiple dependent variables and constraints. This article also exploits a set of categorical environmental variables in the CCCA to improve the fairness of performance evaluation. It is shown that the introduction of the categorical variables helps evaluating the true performance of individual units such as battalions subordinated to different next higher commanders.
    번역하기

    There are many occasions that the performance of a corps is influenced not only by its own efforts but by the commander of the next higher unit in a vertical organizational structure. When the direction of the commander in the next higher organization...

    There are many occasions that the performance of a corps is influenced not only by its own efforts but by the commander of the next higher unit in a vertical organizational structure. When the direction of the commander in the next higher organization is different from that of the actual evaluation agency, the unit under evaluation may get rated lower than what it should deserve. This study suggests an alternative method to evaluate the performance of military units in the situation that there exist critical environmental factors which affect the performance. This method employes DEA, a non parametric method, and Constrained Canonical Correlation Analysis(CCCA), a parametric method which is used to estimate a efficient frontier with multiple dependent variables and constraints. This article also exploits a set of categorical environmental variables in the CCCA to improve the fairness of performance evaluation. It is shown that the introduction of the categorical variables helps evaluating the true performance of individual units such as battalions subordinated to different next higher commanders.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "청와대 새소식" 2005

    2 김성준, "기관별 주요업무에 대한 성과평가지표 개발" 한국행정연구원 2002

    3 Tabachnick, B.G., "Using Multivariate Analysis" Harper Collins 1996

    4 Banker, "The Use of Categorical Variables in Data Envelopment Analysis" 1613-1627, 1986

    5 Sengupta, J.K.,, "Tests of Efficiency in Data Envelopment Analysis" 123-132, 1990

    6 Metters, R.,, "Successful Service Operations Management" South-Western College Publishing 2003

    7 Friedman, L., "Scaling Units via the Canonical Correlation Analysis in the DEA" 100 : 629-637, 1997

    8 Adler, N.,, "Review of Ranking Methods in the Data Envelopment Analysis Context" 140 : 249-265, 2002

    9 Cubbin, J., "Regression versus Data Envelopment Analysis for Efficiency Measurement An Application to the England and Wales Regulated Water Industry" 7 : 75-85, 1999

    10 Arnold, V.L.,, "New uses of DEA and Statistical Regressions for Efficiency Evaluation and Estimation" 66 : 255-327, 1996

    1 "청와대 새소식" 2005

    2 김성준, "기관별 주요업무에 대한 성과평가지표 개발" 한국행정연구원 2002

    3 Tabachnick, B.G., "Using Multivariate Analysis" Harper Collins 1996

    4 Banker, "The Use of Categorical Variables in Data Envelopment Analysis" 1613-1627, 1986

    5 Sengupta, J.K.,, "Tests of Efficiency in Data Envelopment Analysis" 123-132, 1990

    6 Metters, R.,, "Successful Service Operations Management" South-Western College Publishing 2003

    7 Friedman, L., "Scaling Units via the Canonical Correlation Analysis in the DEA" 100 : 629-637, 1997

    8 Adler, N.,, "Review of Ranking Methods in the Data Envelopment Analysis Context" 140 : 249-265, 2002

    9 Cubbin, J., "Regression versus Data Envelopment Analysis for Efficiency Measurement An Application to the England and Wales Regulated Water Industry" 7 : 75-85, 1999

    10 Arnold, V.L.,, "New uses of DEA and Statistical Regressions for Efficiency Evaluation and Estimation" 66 : 255-327, 1996

    11 Tofallis, C, "Model Building with Multiple Dependent Variables and Constraints" 48 : 371-378, 1999

    12 A, "Measuring Inefficiency of Decision-Making Units European Journal of Operational Research" 429-444, 1978

    13 손석호, "IDEA모형을 이용한 단위부대 운영의 효율성 평가" 국방대학교 2003

    14 장철희, "IDEA Model을 적용한 군부대 교육훈련의 효율성 평가" 국방대학교 2002

    15 정우근, "IDEA Model을 이용한 군단급 이상 야전병원의 효율성 측정에 관한 연구" 국방대학교 2003

    16 Cook, W.D.,, "Hierarchies and Groups in DEA" 10 : 177-198, 1998

    17 Gong, "Finite Sample Evidence on the Performance of Stochastic Frontiers and Data Envelopment Analysis Using Panel Data Journal of Econometrics" 259-284, 1992

    18 Cook, W.D., "Evaluating Power Plant Efficiency: A Hierarchical Model" 32 : 813-823, 2005

    19 Simar, L., "Estimation and Inference in Two Stage" Depatrment of Economics, Universtiy of Texas 2004

    20 Tofallis, C.,, "Combining Two Approaches to Efficiency Assessment" 52 : 1225-1231, 2001

    21 Cooper, W.W.,, "A Comprehensive Text with Models" Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2024 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2019-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    2012-04-01 등재 등재후보 탈락 (기타)
    2010-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2008-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼