RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    <훈민정음>(1446)과 어문규정(1988)의 역사적 상관성 연구 -<해례>의 규정과 <한글 맞춤법>을 중심으로? = Studies on historical correlation of Hunminjeongeum and current regulations on Hangeul

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A94485450

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This article examines the historical connection among Hunminjeongeum (1446), South Korea`s current regulations on Hangeul(어문규정, 1988), and North Korea`s current regulations on Hangeul(조선말규범집, 1987), with emphasis on their proposed spelling conventions. The summary of my findings is provided as follows. First, since the emergence of the earliest convention detailed in Haerye, the spelling conventions have shifted from phonemic to phonetic. Second, by comparing Hunminjeongeum and current regulations on Hangeul, we can observe the changes in linguists` understanding of the properties of consonants and vowels. It should be noted that these issues are understood differently by scholars in North and South Korea. Third, as for the horizontal writing convention of the onset consonants, there is a substantial difference among Hunminjeongeum, South Korea`s current regulations on Hangeul, and North Korea`s current regulations on Hangeul. Data confirms that the convention proposed in South Korea`s current regulations on Hangeul is closer to that of Hunminjeongeum than North Korea`s current regulations on Hangeul. Fourth, due to the different interpretations of Hunminjeongeum in the two countries, the spelling conventions experienced a disjuncture, leaving each country with a different convention. The North Korean convention, however, is closer to the original one proposed in Hunminjeongeum. Finally, as for the genitive ㅅ, we observe that scholars in the 15th century used the convention we still believe to be an accurate reflection of language use today.
    번역하기

    This article examines the historical connection among Hunminjeongeum (1446), South Korea`s current regulations on Hangeul(어문규정, 1988), and North Korea`s current regulations on Hangeul(조선말규범집, 1987), with emphasis on their proposed ...

    This article examines the historical connection among Hunminjeongeum (1446), South Korea`s current regulations on Hangeul(어문규정, 1988), and North Korea`s current regulations on Hangeul(조선말규범집, 1987), with emphasis on their proposed spelling conventions. The summary of my findings is provided as follows. First, since the emergence of the earliest convention detailed in Haerye, the spelling conventions have shifted from phonemic to phonetic. Second, by comparing Hunminjeongeum and current regulations on Hangeul, we can observe the changes in linguists` understanding of the properties of consonants and vowels. It should be noted that these issues are understood differently by scholars in North and South Korea. Third, as for the horizontal writing convention of the onset consonants, there is a substantial difference among Hunminjeongeum, South Korea`s current regulations on Hangeul, and North Korea`s current regulations on Hangeul. Data confirms that the convention proposed in South Korea`s current regulations on Hangeul is closer to that of Hunminjeongeum than North Korea`s current regulations on Hangeul. Fourth, due to the different interpretations of Hunminjeongeum in the two countries, the spelling conventions experienced a disjuncture, leaving each country with a different convention. The North Korean convention, however, is closer to the original one proposed in Hunminjeongeum. Finally, as for the genitive ㅅ, we observe that scholars in the 15th century used the convention we still believe to be an accurate reflection of language use today.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼