체제이념적 접근에 따른 통일교육원 교육자료 분석 및 평가

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

As cold war dissolution education and partition awareness dissolution education, the social-cultural
approach has limits as the new paradigm for unification education. This study aims to analyze and
review the educational materials of the Education Center for Unification according to the
systematic-ideological approach in order to present the right direction for unification education as cold
war dissolution education. Educational material analysis were carried out along the four subjects of
partition, North Korea, unification, and unification education, and the results are the following:
First, writings on the partition of the Korean Peninsula emphasize tradition and North Korea's
invasion of the South. For unification, this conservative and confrontational understanding about the
partition must be transformed into an objective and unification-orientated understanding. Second,
understanding about North Korea has dual aspects as both a friend and an enemy. However, unification
education should adopt an internal critical approach towards North Korea, and promote understanding
about North Korea. Third, understanding about unification was examined by dividing it into unification
plan and unification blueprint. Writings on the unification plan criticize North Korea's unification plan,
and emphasize the properness of South Korea's 3rd unification plan. However, there is a need for
greater unification-orientated and versatile approach than the 'low-level unification' approach taken in
the recent inter-Korean summit meeting. Unification blueprints presents liberal-democracy, which
emphasizes liberalism, but South Korean's form of liberal-democracy will cause problems as the
universal blueprint. Therefore, rather than liberal-democracy, social-democracy, which pursues welfare,
freedom, democracy, should be actively examined. Fourth, understanding about unification education is
limited because of its dual aspects, and so an active unification education is required.
Even though there is a positive flow of unification-orientated educational material suitable to the
changing times, it is accompanied by a negative flow of surviving hostile feelings between the North
and the South. Unification education material must follow the new perspective of
systematic-ideological approach and promote direct and expanding understanding about people and
democracy, peace education, active integration with the domain of democratic citizen education, and
use the dialectic synthesis unification approach.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 "현대북한의 이해" 역사비평사 2000

2 "한반도 분단현실과 통일교육의 방향" 동국대학교 1-12, 2000

3 "한국전쟁의 양면성" 을유문화사 1990

4 "한국전쟁의 발발과 기원" 나남출판사 1996

5 "한국전쟁의 국제적 기원" 백산서당 2000

6 "한국전쟁 연구서설" 역사비평사 1990

7 "한국역사연구회 현대사연구반 1950년대 한국사회와 4월 민주항쟁" 1991

8 "한국 시민사회의 이해" 한울 1996

9 "학교통일교육 자료개발 연구" 한국교육개발원 1996

10 "통일한국의 정치체제 형성연구" (9) : 189-228, 1996

11 "통일한국의 정치이념" 민족통일연구원 1994

12 "통일한국의 이념과 체제" 소화 1999

13 "통일의 논리를 찾아서" 한겨레신문사 1995

14 "통일시대의 북한학" 당대 1996

15 "통일문제 이해" 통일부 2005b

16 "통일교육의 이론과 실천" 교육과학사 2001

17 "통일교육의 발전방향과 실천과제남북정상회담 이후의 통일교육을 중심으로" 건국대학교 대학원 정치학과 13 : 81-155, 2000

18 "통일교육의 다원화와 제도개선 방안" 오름 2002

19 "통일교육에 있어서의 민족, 평화, 시민에 대한 논의"" 33 : 141-162, 2001

20 "통일교육 개선방향" 6 (6): 1-22, 1997

21 "통일과 참여민주주의" 창작과 비평사 1997

22 "탈냉전시대 한국전쟁의 재조명" 백산서당 2000

23 "정치교육으로서의 통일교육 내용과 변화분석" 32 (32): 265-288, 2005

24 "정치교육과 통일교육" 문우사 1997

25 "외국 민주시민교육의 통일교육적 함의" 시민정치학회보 (6) : 248-274, 2003

26 "분단시대의 통일학" 한울아카데미 1998

27 "민주시민교육과 통일교육의 균형적 발전방향" (5) : 111-139, 2000

28 "남북한 체제비교와 통합모델의 모색" 세종연구소 1995

29 "남북한 정치체제의 이념과 현실" 세종연구소 1995

30 "남과 북 하나가 되는 길" 대한매일신보사 1999

31 "The Korean war" Princeton University Press 1995

32 "2005년도 통일교육지침서(학교용)" 통일부 2004

33 "2005년도 통일교육지침서(일반용)" 통일부 2004