RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재 SCOPUS

    마을만들기 시범사업의 추진체계와 참여자 역할 분석

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101721542

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    "Community-Design" is the movement and the project which enhances residence area, mainly led by residents themselves. The project improves the feature of life by upgrading the living environment, not only physically reformed, but also continuously cared by residents, administration and experts. However, in the process of the project which accompanies a number of residents and groups, some problems are exposed; conflicts of opinions and confusion between each part of roles are caused, so sometimes the plan goes off on a tangent or communities are broken up. Thus, this study draw the exemplary promotion system and the roles of participants from some cases in the demonstration projects. The goal of this study is to suggest a standard model for applying to the future business of "Community-Design" by verifying the suggested system. The scope of this study covers "DaeHak-Dong in Ansan" case and urban residence and commerce area case among "Making the Livable City"; a representative sample of the domestic business of "Community Design". The standard promotion system is divided into "led by administration" and "led by residents". This study tests propriety from the cases of "led by residents" based on the aim of "Community Design". In the process of the project, residents should try to play a leading role, and administration and expert should play a directly supporting role. Participants should maintain governance through lateral relationship with mutual intelligibility, and aim to have a complementary role with the proper participate time on each phase.
    번역하기

    "Community-Design" is the movement and the project which enhances residence area, mainly led by residents themselves. The project improves the feature of life by upgrading the living environment, not only physically reformed, but also continuously car...

    "Community-Design" is the movement and the project which enhances residence area, mainly led by residents themselves. The project improves the feature of life by upgrading the living environment, not only physically reformed, but also continuously cared by residents, administration and experts. However, in the process of the project which accompanies a number of residents and groups, some problems are exposed; conflicts of opinions and confusion between each part of roles are caused, so sometimes the plan goes off on a tangent or communities are broken up. Thus, this study draw the exemplary promotion system and the roles of participants from some cases in the demonstration projects. The goal of this study is to suggest a standard model for applying to the future business of "Community-Design" by verifying the suggested system. The scope of this study covers "DaeHak-Dong in Ansan" case and urban residence and commerce area case among "Making the Livable City"; a representative sample of the domestic business of "Community Design". The standard promotion system is divided into "led by administration" and "led by residents". This study tests propriety from the cases of "led by residents" based on the aim of "Community Design". In the process of the project, residents should try to play a leading role, and administration and expert should play a directly supporting role. Participants should maintain governance through lateral relationship with mutual intelligibility, and aim to have a complementary role with the proper participate time on each phase.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Abstract
    • 1. 서론
    • 2. 이론적 고찰
    • 3. 살고 싶은 마을만들기 시범사업의 분석
    • 4. 안산시 “대학동 명문거리 만들기” 사업의 분석 및 비교를 통한 표준 모델 검증
    • Abstract
    • 1. 서론
    • 2. 이론적 고찰
    • 3. 살고 싶은 마을만들기 시범사업의 분석
    • 4. 안산시 “대학동 명문거리 만들기” 사업의 분석 및 비교를 통한 표준 모델 검증
    • 5. 결론
    • REFERENCES
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 신중진, "지속가능한 마을만들기를 위한 추진주체의 관계구도 특성 연구 - 살고싶은 도시만들기 시범사업을 대상으로-" 대한건축학회 26 (26): 295-306, 2010

    2 신중진, "마을만들기 사업에서 주민의 역할변화에 따른 지원방안 연구 - 서울 독산3동 마을만들기 사례를 중심으로 -" 대한건축학회 26 (26): 233-244, 2010

    3 Wates, N, "Towns and Villages in Any Part of the World" Routledge 12-, 2014

    4 Lee, S, "The Community Design for City of Sympathy" Misewoom 100-137, 2014

    5 Yoo, H, "The Campaign of Community Design in Ansan in Company with NGO, Admin, and Residents" 262 (262): 92-, 2003

    6 Sungkyunkwan Univ. Research and Business Foundation, "Making Livable Village : The Result and Assignment of Demonstration Projects" Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements 51-548, 2013

    7 Comunity Design Center, "Doing Community Design -Life Space of Raising Residents Participation-" NaMuDosi 96-113, 2009

    8 Kwon, S, "Community Design Middle Support : National Present Condition and Prospect of Community Design Support Centers" Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements 2013

    1 신중진, "지속가능한 마을만들기를 위한 추진주체의 관계구도 특성 연구 - 살고싶은 도시만들기 시범사업을 대상으로-" 대한건축학회 26 (26): 295-306, 2010

    2 신중진, "마을만들기 사업에서 주민의 역할변화에 따른 지원방안 연구 - 서울 독산3동 마을만들기 사례를 중심으로 -" 대한건축학회 26 (26): 233-244, 2010

    3 Wates, N, "Towns and Villages in Any Part of the World" Routledge 12-, 2014

    4 Lee, S, "The Community Design for City of Sympathy" Misewoom 100-137, 2014

    5 Yoo, H, "The Campaign of Community Design in Ansan in Company with NGO, Admin, and Residents" 262 (262): 92-, 2003

    6 Sungkyunkwan Univ. Research and Business Foundation, "Making Livable Village : The Result and Assignment of Demonstration Projects" Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements 51-548, 2013

    7 Comunity Design Center, "Doing Community Design -Life Space of Raising Residents Participation-" NaMuDosi 96-113, 2009

    8 Kwon, S, "Community Design Middle Support : National Present Condition and Prospect of Community Design Support Centers" Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements 2013

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2017-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-03-25 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한건축학회논문집 -> 대한건축학회논문집 계획계
    외국어명 : Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea -> Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design
    KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-08-02 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, Structure&Construction -> Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-10-14 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한건축학회논문집 구조계 -> 대한건축학회논문집 KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.38 0.38 0.38
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.41 0.4 0.742 0.11
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼