RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KEDO 사례의 교훈 = Lessons of the KEDO Case

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=E1063533

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In January 2006, the KEDO (Korean Peninsula Energy Development Organization) light-water reactor (LWR) project in the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK or North Korea) 11 years after the U.S.-DPRK Agreed Framework went into effect and 8 year after the construction work started, and 2 years after the site work was frozen. The LWR issue was resurrected, however, when the 6-party members agreed in the Joint Statement "to discuss, at an appropriate time, the subject of the provision of light water reactor to the DPRK." Then, can the LWR construction be resumed as the 6-party talks make progress? Answers can be found in lessons learned from the failure of the KEDO LWR project.
      This paper locates four groups of obstacles to the KEDO LWR project: North Korea's failure to implement agreements and contracts, continued political support of sponsors to the project, North Korea's own preparation to receive the LWR and its full implementation of nonproliferation obligations. Unless all of these four obstacles are cleared, the LWR project cannot make much progress. This position contradicts, however, North Korea's position of "the LWR first."
      In conclusion, this paper argues that unless North Korea becomes a 'normal and responsible' country in international society, the LWR may not be delivered, much less completed. These and above four conditions apply equally to the future LWR project. In order to avoid making another aborted LWR project, North Korea should change and learn to abide by international norms first.
      번역하기

      In January 2006, the KEDO (Korean Peninsula Energy Development Organization) light-water reactor (LWR) project in the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK or North Korea) 11 years after the U.S.-DPRK Agreed Framework went into effect and 8 year...

      In January 2006, the KEDO (Korean Peninsula Energy Development Organization) light-water reactor (LWR) project in the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK or North Korea) 11 years after the U.S.-DPRK Agreed Framework went into effect and 8 year after the construction work started, and 2 years after the site work was frozen. The LWR issue was resurrected, however, when the 6-party members agreed in the Joint Statement "to discuss, at an appropriate time, the subject of the provision of light water reactor to the DPRK." Then, can the LWR construction be resumed as the 6-party talks make progress? Answers can be found in lessons learned from the failure of the KEDO LWR project.
      This paper locates four groups of obstacles to the KEDO LWR project: North Korea's failure to implement agreements and contracts, continued political support of sponsors to the project, North Korea's own preparation to receive the LWR and its full implementation of nonproliferation obligations. Unless all of these four obstacles are cleared, the LWR project cannot make much progress. This position contradicts, however, North Korea's position of "the LWR first."
      In conclusion, this paper argues that unless North Korea becomes a 'normal and responsible' country in international society, the LWR may not be delivered, much less completed. These and above four conditions apply equally to the future LWR project. In order to avoid making another aborted LWR project, North Korea should change and learn to abide by international norms first.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • I. 서론 1
      • II. KEDO 경수로사업 배경과 의의 2
      • 1. 북한의 경수로 요구 2
      • 2. 한국의 경수로사업 참여 4
      • 3. 경수로사업의 의의 5
      • I. 서론 1
      • II. KEDO 경수로사업 배경과 의의 2
      • 1. 북한의 경수로 요구 2
      • 2. 한국의 경수로사업 참여 4
      • 3. 경수로사업의 의의 5
      • III. 경수로사업의 장애물 7
      • 1. 북한의 합의서와 계약서 이행문제 8
      • 2. 사업에 대한 정치적지지 유치 8
      • 3. 북한의 경수로 수용능력 9
      • 4. 핵비확산 의무 이행 10
      • 5. 소결론 11
      • IV. 결론 12
      • Abstract 15
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼