「산업입지 및 개발에 관한 법률」과「산업집적활성화 및 공장설립에 관한 법률」에서의 의제규정에 관한 고찰 = A Study on Regulations in Form of Legal Fiction in 'INDUSTRIAL CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT AND FACTORY ESTABLISHMENT ACT' And 'INDUSTRIAL SITES AND DEVELOPMENT ACT'

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The ‘INDUSTRIAL SITES AND DEVELOPMENT ACT’(We call this simply ‘ISDA’) is aiming at industrial sites and industrial complex and The ‘INDUSTRIAL CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT AND FACTORY ESTABLISHMENT ACT’(We call this simply ‘ICFEA’) is aiming at stimulating indusrial cluster by sophiscating the structures of industrial complex. This means that the above two is playing the purposive role of firing up indusrial cluster.
The above two have so many regulations in form of legal fiction in each of them. This comes from the fact that they take control of administrative authorizationㆍpermission.
The most of them are about legal fiction of administrative authorizationㆍpermission, but some are about concentration effect, some have the middle character.
Of course, although we have different opinions between legal characters of legal fiction of administrative authorizationㆍpermission and concentration effect, we see that legal fiction of administrative authorizationㆍpermission means a administrative deed is ragarded as legal fiction of administrative authorizationㆍpermission and concentration effect means a inclusive administrative treatment is regarded as some treatments of authorizationㆍpermission.
It matters most that some regulations in form of legal fiction means concentration effect or simple legal fiction of administrative authorizationㆍpermission. In case of concentration effect the degree of concentration is denser than that of legal fiction of administrative authorizationㆍpermission. And If legal fiction of administrative authorizationㆍpermission and concentration effect are regulated at the same artricle, firstly the boundary of fiction by that article will be fixed by the article, in case of uncertainty of the boundary the boundary will be varied with this or that.
The above two(‘ISDA’ & ‘ICFEA’) is regulated supra slimly in use of so many cases of legal fiction. Even though it is so simple in appearance the regulation in too simple and slim form could concurr the ambiguity of its meaning. We can see the example in case of ‘ISDA’ Article 45-4 (1) 6.
By the time, the supreme court case says that the legal fiction of legal fiction cann't be recognized by court, and according to the case law the above two regulates each expression in each article like that which includes the case of legal fiction.
In that meaning the two are quite fine and sophisticated regulations.
The above two(‘ISDA’ & ‘ICFEA’) have little flaws in general. But there are rooms for disputes in the future time.
In my thoght It would be useless to regulate so simplely and slimly in a degree of concurring the ambiguity of its meaning by that form of legistlation.
Two much sophisticated regulation could concurr the contradiction between the articles, but could avoid the big flaw in legistalation.
The ambiguity of meaning in regulation leads to the violation of costitutional law, and the interpretation of the law would be the legistlation itself in fact.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 序論
• Ⅱ. ‘산입법’과 ‘산집법’의 각 내용과 상호 입법체계적 연관
• Ⅲ. 의제규정과 집중효
• Ⅳ. ‘산입법’ 및 ‘산집법’에서의 각 인?허가의제 검토
• Ⅴ. ‘산입법’과 ‘산집법’ 사이의 연계체계상 입법현황
• Ⅵ. 맺음
• 參考文獻
• 〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 박균성, "환경법(제3판)" 박영사 2008

2 홍정선, "행정법특강(9판)" 박영사 2010

3 김동희, "행정법요론" 박영사 2010

4 류지태, "행정법신론(제14판)" 박영사 2010

5 박균성, "행정법강의(제7판)" 박영사 2010

6 김철용, "행정법Ⅰ(제13판)" 박영사 686-, 2010

7 김남진, "행정법Ⅰ(제10판)" 법문사 2006

8 김재호, "행정계획론 소고" 18 (18): 2007

9 박윤흔, "최신행정법강의(상)" 박영사 2009

10 정형근, "집중효가 발생하는 건축신고에 관한 법률적 검토" 법학연구소 34 (34): 279-295, 2010

11 강현호, "집중효" 28 (28): 2000

12 김성수, "일반행정법" 법문사 2004

13 박균성, "인ㆍ허가의제제도의 문제점과 개선방안" 행정법이론실무학회(行政法理論實務學會) (26) : 33-57, 2010

14 정태용, "인ㆍ허가의제제도에 관한 고찰" 2002

15 선정원, "인·허가의제와 심사촉진. in: 경제질서, 경제적 기본권 그리고 국가의 규제와 조정" 2009

16 오준근, "서울시 뉴타운 개발의 법적 문제점" 한국토지공법학회 30 : 27-46, 2006

17 김재광, "사회갈등시설법론" 한국학술정보 2007

18 지원림, "민법강의(제8판)" 홍문사 2010

19 한귀현, "독일행정법상의 집중효에 관한 연구" 한국법제연구원 (26) : 249-276, 2004

20 박종국, "독일법상의 계획확정결정의 集中效" 法制處 (555) : 2004

21 김종보, "도시재정비촉진을 위한 특별법의 제정경위와 법적 한계" 한국토지공법학회 35 : 71-90, 2007

22 강현호, "뉴타운 건설과 관련된 법적 쟁점" 한국토지공법학회 41 : 23-54, 2008

23 김종보, "건축허가에 존재하는 재량문제" 행정법이론실무학회 (3) : 1998

24 남대하, "集中效가 발생하는 건축법상 건축신고에 관한 고찰" 大邱判例硏究會 (17) : 2008

25 西谷剛, "計画手続の立法判断" 1998

26 山田洋, "計劃確定決定の集中效 : 西ドイツ行政手續法の現狀と課題. in: 行政法の 諸問題 : 雄川一郞先生獻呈論集,.中卷 中" 有斐閣 1990

27 金載光, "行政法上 集中效制度의 檢討" 韓國土地公法學會 (9) : 2000

28 徐元宇, "大規模施設計劃確定節次의 集中效 : 독일에서의 論議를 중심으로. in: 現代行政法學理論 : 佑齊李鳴九博士華甲紀念論文集Ⅱ, II권" 考試硏究社 1996

29 Beckmann, "Zur gerichtlichen Kontrolle abfallrechtlicher Planfeststellungen" 1988

30 Fickert, "Zur Konzentrationswirung der Planfeststellung nach §18b Abs. 1 FStrG für wasserrechtliche Erlaubnis und Bewilligungen" 1984

31 Jarass, Konkurrenz, "Konzentration und Bindungswirkung von Genehmigungen" 1984

32 Laubinger, "Der Umfang der Konzentrationswirkung der Planfeststellung" VerwArch 1986