RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재 SSCI SCOPUS

    The Mixed-Member Majoritarian System as a Policy Solution: An Evaluation of Its Political Effect in Korea

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104868611

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study examines the function and effect of the mixed-member majoritarian (MMM) electoral system in Korea. The current electoral system was adopted in 2004, there having been three general elections since. When adopted, the new MMM system was expected to resolve several political problems by increasing proportionality and minority representation, alleviating regionalism and increasing voter turnout. However, in a similar vein with the previous literature, this paper found that the current system did not function as the reformers intended because the number of PR seats was too small.
    We also examined two institutional alternatives, the Japanese revival match system and the German mixed member proportional representation (MMP) system, for possible future reform. The German MMP system would bring about greatly improved political outcomes.
    번역하기

    This study examines the function and effect of the mixed-member majoritarian (MMM) electoral system in Korea. The current electoral system was adopted in 2004, there having been three general elections since. When adopted, the new MMM system was expec...

    This study examines the function and effect of the mixed-member majoritarian (MMM) electoral system in Korea. The current electoral system was adopted in 2004, there having been three general elections since. When adopted, the new MMM system was expected to resolve several political problems by increasing proportionality and minority representation, alleviating regionalism and increasing voter turnout. However, in a similar vein with the previous literature, this paper found that the current system did not function as the reformers intended because the number of PR seats was too small.
    We also examined two institutional alternatives, the Japanese revival match system and the German mixed member proportional representation (MMP) system, for possible future reform. The German MMP system would bring about greatly improved political outcomes.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 장훈, "혼합형 선거제도의 정치적 효과" 한국정치학회 40 (40): 191-213, 2006

    2 김영래, "한국의 혼합선거제도와 정당체제의 변화 연구" 인류사회재건연구원 24 (24): 171-205, 2009

    3 김만흠, "지역균열의 정당체제와 선거제도 개편: 개편 논란과 새로운 대안" 사회과학연구원 한국정치연구소 20 (20): 236-257, 2011

    4 김용복, "정당정치의 발전을 위한 선거제도의 개혁 : 비례대표제의 확대와 석패율제도의 도입" 한국민주주의연구소 (20) : 39-70, 2009

    5 최태욱, "복지국가 건설과 ‘포괄정치’의 작동을 위한 선거제도 개혁" 민주사회정책연구원 19 (19): 42-70, 2011

    6 Shugart, Matthew S, "Wattenberg, Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds?" Oxford University Press 2001

    7 Kohno, Masaru, "Voter Turnout and Strategic Ticket-Splitting under Japan’s New Electoral Rules" 37 (37): 1997

    8 Gschwend, Thomas, "Ticket-Splitting and Strategic Voting under Mixed Electoral Rules : Evidence from Germany" 46 (46): 2007

    9 Kang, Won Taek, "The Political Reform and Democracy in Korea" Ingan-sarang 2005

    10 Kang, Miong Sei, "The Changing Korean Party System?" 4 (4): 2005

    1 장훈, "혼합형 선거제도의 정치적 효과" 한국정치학회 40 (40): 191-213, 2006

    2 김영래, "한국의 혼합선거제도와 정당체제의 변화 연구" 인류사회재건연구원 24 (24): 171-205, 2009

    3 김만흠, "지역균열의 정당체제와 선거제도 개편: 개편 논란과 새로운 대안" 사회과학연구원 한국정치연구소 20 (20): 236-257, 2011

    4 김용복, "정당정치의 발전을 위한 선거제도의 개혁 : 비례대표제의 확대와 석패율제도의 도입" 한국민주주의연구소 (20) : 39-70, 2009

    5 최태욱, "복지국가 건설과 ‘포괄정치’의 작동을 위한 선거제도 개혁" 민주사회정책연구원 19 (19): 42-70, 2011

    6 Shugart, Matthew S, "Wattenberg, Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds?" Oxford University Press 2001

    7 Kohno, Masaru, "Voter Turnout and Strategic Ticket-Splitting under Japan’s New Electoral Rules" 37 (37): 1997

    8 Gschwend, Thomas, "Ticket-Splitting and Strategic Voting under Mixed Electoral Rules : Evidence from Germany" 46 (46): 2007

    9 Kang, Won Taek, "The Political Reform and Democracy in Korea" Ingan-sarang 2005

    10 Kang, Miong Sei, "The Changing Korean Party System?" 4 (4): 2005

    11 Karp, Jeffrey A., "Strategic Voting, Party Activity, and Candidate Effects : Testing Explanations for Split Voting in New Zealand’s New Mixed System" 21 (21): 2002

    12 Gallagher, Michael, "Proportionality, Disproportionality and Electoral Systems" 10 (10): 1991

    13 Sartori, Giovanni, "Parties and Party Systems : A Framework for Analysis" Cambridge University Press 1976

    14 Kim, Wang Sik, "Korean Election V" Orom 2006

    15 Morrison, Minion K. C., "Ghana’s Political Parties : How Ethno/Regional Variations Sustain the National Two-Party System" 44 (44): 2006

    16 Pappi, Franz U., "Electoral Behavior in a Two-Vote System : Incentives for Ticket Splitting in German Bundestag Elections" 42 (42): 2002

    17 박찬욱, "Effects of a Two-Vote Mixed-Member Majoritarian System on Citizens’Voting Behavior in the Korean National Assembly Elections" 한국정치학회 43 (43): 93-111, 2009

    18 Laakso, Markku., "Effective Number of Parties : A Measure with Applications to West Europe" 12 (12): 1979

    19 Pereira, Paulo Trigo., "Citizens’ Freedom to Choose Representatives : Ballot Structure, Proportionality and ‘Fragmented’ Parliaments" 28 (28): 2009

    20 Karp, Jeffrey A, "Candidate Effects and Spill-Over in Mixed Systems : Evidence from New Zealand" 28 (28): 2009

    21 Auh, Soo-Young, "An Analysis of the Political Effects of the Introduction of a Mixed-Member Majoritarian System in Korea" 1 (1): 2011

    22 Kim, Hyung-Chul, "A Mixed Electoral System and the Political Effects: A Comparative Analysis of New Zealand, Japan, and Korea" 5 (5): 2007

    23 Kim, Wook, "A Critical Reappraisal on the Applicability of the Sekihairitsu Rule in Korea"

    24 김종갑, "2011년 개정 독일선거제도와 한국적 적용 방안" 현대정치연구소 5 (5): 45-73, 2012

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2023 평가 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 SSCI 등재 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2001-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.24 0.18 0.22
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.22 0.27 0.448 0
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼