RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      현상성과 물질성 : 폴 드만의 문자

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76567855

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Materiality is one that appears with increasing frequency in de Man’s later works. It has differing registers, all elliptical but interrelated: “a material vision,” “the materiality of the letter,” “the materiality of an inscription,” and “the materiality of actual history, for example. De Man writes that it cannot be exactly understood in any linguistic terms; as pure anteriority, it eludes cognition and cannot be accessible through our physical senses. Its emergence in de Man’s writings, especially in later years, marks a remarkable shift in his critical-linguistic apparatus from tropological displacements to what conditions and limits any metaphoricity. Drawing on this enigmatic entity of materiality, he seems to be engaged in a critical process of revaluing the concepts of history and aesthetics, concepts that, he argues, have been received in accordance with the model of practicality, empirical appeals, identity politics, and all forms of metaphorical self-transparency.
      If so, the critical examination of de Man’s materiality is a prerequisite for understanding his unique ideas of history, ideology, linguistic practices, body, and aesthetics. Therefore, the first part of this paper is mainly dedicated to analyzing de Man’s notion of irony and allegory, two central rhetorical concepts that characterize his linguistic principles in his later years. The assumptions of these concepts, insists de Man, radically question the legitimacy of cognitive and metaphorical models as proper critical paradigms. After this, this paper moves to a critical examination of his view of history, ideology, and aesthetics, all of which are built upon his unique linguistic principles and are undeniably affiliated with what is implied or involved in his ideas of materiality. The central argument of this paper is that de Man’s term of materiality disarticulates any attempts at referential totality. Instead, it proposes the practice of de-metaphorization and dis-figuration, thereby bespeaking a protocol of deconstructive reading that resists all forms of appropriation.
      번역하기

      Materiality is one that appears with increasing frequency in de Man’s later works. It has differing registers, all elliptical but interrelated: “a material vision,” “the materiality of the letter,” “the materiality of an inscription,” an...

      Materiality is one that appears with increasing frequency in de Man’s later works. It has differing registers, all elliptical but interrelated: “a material vision,” “the materiality of the letter,” “the materiality of an inscription,” and “the materiality of actual history, for example. De Man writes that it cannot be exactly understood in any linguistic terms; as pure anteriority, it eludes cognition and cannot be accessible through our physical senses. Its emergence in de Man’s writings, especially in later years, marks a remarkable shift in his critical-linguistic apparatus from tropological displacements to what conditions and limits any metaphoricity. Drawing on this enigmatic entity of materiality, he seems to be engaged in a critical process of revaluing the concepts of history and aesthetics, concepts that, he argues, have been received in accordance with the model of practicality, empirical appeals, identity politics, and all forms of metaphorical self-transparency.
      If so, the critical examination of de Man’s materiality is a prerequisite for understanding his unique ideas of history, ideology, linguistic practices, body, and aesthetics. Therefore, the first part of this paper is mainly dedicated to analyzing de Man’s notion of irony and allegory, two central rhetorical concepts that characterize his linguistic principles in his later years. The assumptions of these concepts, insists de Man, radically question the legitimacy of cognitive and metaphorical models as proper critical paradigms. After this, this paper moves to a critical examination of his view of history, ideology, and aesthetics, all of which are built upon his unique linguistic principles and are undeniably affiliated with what is implied or involved in his ideas of materiality. The central argument of this paper is that de Man’s term of materiality disarticulates any attempts at referential totality. Instead, it proposes the practice of de-metaphorization and dis-figuration, thereby bespeaking a protocol of deconstructive reading that resists all forms of appropriation.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Warminski, Andrzej, "“‘As the Poets Do It’: On the Material Sublime" Material Events 3-31,

      2 Derrida, Jacques, "Typewriter Ribbon" Material Events 277-360,

      3 Berlin, Isaiah, "Three Critics of the Enlightenment: Vico, Hamann, Herder" Princeton UP 2000

      4 de Man, Paul, "The Rhetoric of Romanticism" Columbia UP 1984

      5 de Man, Paul, "The Resistance to Theory" U of Minnesota P 1997

      6 Benjamin, Walter, "The Origin of German Tragic Drama. Intro. George Steiner" Verso 1998

      7 Kant, Immanuel, "The Critique of the Power of Judgment" Cambridge UP 2000

      8 Cohen, Tom, "Political Thrillers: Hitchcock, de Man, and Secret Agency in the ‘Aesthetic State.’" Material Events 114-152,

      9 Hegel, G. W. F, "Phenomenology of Spirit" Oxford UP, 1979

      10 Miller, J. Hilllis, "Paul de Man as Allergen" Material Events 183-204,

      1 Warminski, Andrzej, "“‘As the Poets Do It’: On the Material Sublime" Material Events 3-31,

      2 Derrida, Jacques, "Typewriter Ribbon" Material Events 277-360,

      3 Berlin, Isaiah, "Three Critics of the Enlightenment: Vico, Hamann, Herder" Princeton UP 2000

      4 de Man, Paul, "The Rhetoric of Romanticism" Columbia UP 1984

      5 de Man, Paul, "The Resistance to Theory" U of Minnesota P 1997

      6 Benjamin, Walter, "The Origin of German Tragic Drama. Intro. George Steiner" Verso 1998

      7 Kant, Immanuel, "The Critique of the Power of Judgment" Cambridge UP 2000

      8 Cohen, Tom, "Political Thrillers: Hitchcock, de Man, and Secret Agency in the ‘Aesthetic State.’" Material Events 114-152,

      9 Hegel, G. W. F, "Phenomenology of Spirit" Oxford UP, 1979

      10 Miller, J. Hilllis, "Paul de Man as Allergen" Material Events 183-204,

      11 Ayers, David, "Materialism and the Book" 24 (24): 759-780, 2003

      12 Cohen, Tom, "Material Events" U of Minnesota P 2001

      13 Althusser, Louis, "Lenin and Philosophy and Other essays" Monthly Review 1971

      14 Aarsleff, Hans, "From Locke to Saussure: Essays on the Study of Language and Intellectual History" U of Minnesota P 1982

      15 Marx, Karl, "Capital. in:Ben Fowkes Vol 1" Penguin 1976

      16 de Man, Paul, "Blindness and Insight. Essays in the Rhetoric of Contemporary Criticism. 2nd ed" U of Minnesota P 1983

      17 Sprinker, Michael, "Art and Ideology: Althusser and de Man" Material Events 32-48,

      18 de Man, Paul, "Allegories of Reading: Figural Language in Rousseau, Nietzsche, Rilke, and Proust" Yale UP 1979

      19 de Man, Paul, "Aesthetic Ideology. Ed. Andrzej Warminski" U of Minnesota P 1996

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-29 학술지명변경 외국어명 : The New Korean Journal of English Lnaguage & Literature -> The New Korean Journal of English Language & Literature KCI등재
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-04-21 학회명변경 영문명 : 미등록 -> The New Korean Association of English Language and Literature KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.17 0.17 0.18
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.19 0.17 0.441 0.06
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼