RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    신탁업자의 정비사업 시행참여에 관한 법적 연구 = A Study on Trust Business entity` Participation in the Implementation of Rearrangement Projects

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Rearrangement projects make a contribution to the higher quality of housing life for people by improving deteriorated and faulty housing environments in urban areas. There are, however, many cases in which rearrangement projects are postponed in their processes due to the lack of professionalism and morality of the partnership, conflicting interests among the members of partnership, and low feasibility. In an effort to resolve those problems, they are preparing a plan to allow trust business entity to do rearrangement projects. If there are some institutional complementary measures taken, trust business entity will be capable of doing rearrangement projects in a professional and transparent manner and carrying out their affairs objectively, which means that there is a need to allow them to do such projects. Currently the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents is being revised (plan) to allow trust business entity to be entrusted with the direct implementation right by the property owners and do rearrangement projects on their own. However, the idea seems difficult to be realized for the following reasons: first, trust business entity have their limitations with the implementation of rearrangement projects as the subjects of public interest proj-ects; second, it is difficult to coordinate the interests of all property owners and carry on rearrangement projects only with trust agreements and rearrangement project implementation regulations; third, the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents has basic provisions only for the cases in which trust business entity do rearrangement projects, which does not correspond with the flow of project propulsion method through the establishment of partnership; finally, inefficiency can be caused in the propulsion of rearrangement projects by trust business entity. In other words, the need for trust business entity to participate in rearrangement projects is recognized, but it will be difficult to apply the method of getting trust from the property owners directly in the early stage of rearrangement project and working on the project. If that is difficult, the approach will not be much different from the loan-type (development-type) land trust. It is thus needed to revise the provision about the implementors of rearrangement projects in the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents and allow trust business entity to participate in the implementation of rearrangement projects. There should be discussions about the ways how trust business entity should be appointed and the scope of job delegation to them in order to allow them to participate in the implementation of rearrangement projects. It is important to select trust business entity for rearrangement projects in an objective and transparent manner and set a clear boundary of job delegation to the selected ones. It is also needed to have discussions about financing when trust business entity participate in the implementation of rearrangement projects. When trust business entity participate in the implementation of rearrangement projects, funds can be raised in diverse ways. However, financing issues should be resolved in the early stage of such projects. Furthermore, it is also required to define relations between trust business entity and professional management enterprises for rearrangement projects that have been managing rearrangement projects clearly and establish regulations about the limits on trust business entity`` liability for damages.
    번역하기

    Rearrangement projects make a contribution to the higher quality of housing life for people by improving deteriorated and faulty housing environments in urban areas. There are, however, many cases in which rearrangement projects are postponed in their...

    Rearrangement projects make a contribution to the higher quality of housing life for people by improving deteriorated and faulty housing environments in urban areas. There are, however, many cases in which rearrangement projects are postponed in their processes due to the lack of professionalism and morality of the partnership, conflicting interests among the members of partnership, and low feasibility. In an effort to resolve those problems, they are preparing a plan to allow trust business entity to do rearrangement projects. If there are some institutional complementary measures taken, trust business entity will be capable of doing rearrangement projects in a professional and transparent manner and carrying out their affairs objectively, which means that there is a need to allow them to do such projects. Currently the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents is being revised (plan) to allow trust business entity to be entrusted with the direct implementation right by the property owners and do rearrangement projects on their own. However, the idea seems difficult to be realized for the following reasons: first, trust business entity have their limitations with the implementation of rearrangement projects as the subjects of public interest proj-ects; second, it is difficult to coordinate the interests of all property owners and carry on rearrangement projects only with trust agreements and rearrangement project implementation regulations; third, the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents has basic provisions only for the cases in which trust business entity do rearrangement projects, which does not correspond with the flow of project propulsion method through the establishment of partnership; finally, inefficiency can be caused in the propulsion of rearrangement projects by trust business entity. In other words, the need for trust business entity to participate in rearrangement projects is recognized, but it will be difficult to apply the method of getting trust from the property owners directly in the early stage of rearrangement project and working on the project. If that is difficult, the approach will not be much different from the loan-type (development-type) land trust. It is thus needed to revise the provision about the implementors of rearrangement projects in the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents and allow trust business entity to participate in the implementation of rearrangement projects. There should be discussions about the ways how trust business entity should be appointed and the scope of job delegation to them in order to allow them to participate in the implementation of rearrangement projects. It is important to select trust business entity for rearrangement projects in an objective and transparent manner and set a clear boundary of job delegation to the selected ones. It is also needed to have discussions about financing when trust business entity participate in the implementation of rearrangement projects. When trust business entity participate in the implementation of rearrangement projects, funds can be raised in diverse ways. However, financing issues should be resolved in the early stage of such projects. Furthermore, it is also required to define relations between trust business entity and professional management enterprises for rearrangement projects that have been managing rearrangement projects clearly and establish regulations about the limits on trust business entity`` liability for damages.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 국가청렴위원회, "주택재개발·재건축 분야 투명성 제고를 위한 제도개선방안" 2006

    2 광장신탁법연구회, "주석 신탁법" 박영사 2013

    3 박치범, "재건축·재개발해설서 도시및주거환경정비법" 진원사 2012

    4 한국증권법학회, "자본시장법〔주석서Ⅰ〕" 박영사 2009

    5 서후석, "신탁업을 통한 부동산시장 활성화 전략―정비사업 참여를 중심으로―" 2014

    6 법무부, "신탁법 해설"

    7 최동식, "신탁법" 법문사 2006

    8 서울특별시, "서울시, 주거 정비사업 전문관리업체 일제점검 실시"

    9 신영수, "부동산신탁의 쟁점" (62) : 2013

    10 이완영, "도시및주거환경정비법 일부개정법률안(의안번호 12721)"

    1 국가청렴위원회, "주택재개발·재건축 분야 투명성 제고를 위한 제도개선방안" 2006

    2 광장신탁법연구회, "주석 신탁법" 박영사 2013

    3 박치범, "재건축·재개발해설서 도시및주거환경정비법" 진원사 2012

    4 한국증권법학회, "자본시장법〔주석서Ⅰ〕" 박영사 2009

    5 서후석, "신탁업을 통한 부동산시장 활성화 전략―정비사업 참여를 중심으로―" 2014

    6 법무부, "신탁법 해설"

    7 최동식, "신탁법" 법문사 2006

    8 서울특별시, "서울시, 주거 정비사업 전문관리업체 일제점검 실시"

    9 신영수, "부동산신탁의 쟁점" (62) : 2013

    10 이완영, "도시및주거환경정비법 일부개정법률안(의안번호 12721)"

    11 금융감독원, "2014년 상반기 신탁업 영업 현황 분석 자료"

    12 금융감독원, "2014년 부동산신탁회사 영업실적 분석 자료"

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2008-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.77 0.77 0.8
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.7 0.65 0.772 0.44
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼