하악 무치악 부위의 임플란트 이식을 위한 전산화단층촬영 영상의 비교 평가 = Comparative evaluation of computed tomography for dental implants on the mandibular edentulous area

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Purpose : The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical usefulness of the recently developed multi-detector computed tomography and cone beam computed tomography in pre-operative implant evaluation, by comparing them with the single detector computed tomography, already confirmed for accuracy in this area.
Materials and Methods : Five partially edentulous dry human mandibles, with 1×1 mm gutta percha cones, placed in 5 mm intervals posterior to the mental foramen on each side of the buccal part of the mandible, were used in this study. They were scanned as follows:
1) Single detector computed tomography: slice thickness 1 mm, 200 mA, 120 kV
2) Multi-detector computed tomography: slice thickness 0.75 mm, 250 mA, 120 kV
3) Cone beam computed tomography: 15 mAs, 120 kV
Axial images acquired from three computed tomographies were transferred to personal computer, and then reformatted cross-sectional images were generated using V-Implant 2.0 (CyberMed Inc., Seoul, Korea) software. Among the cross-sectional images of the gutta percha cone, placed in the buccal body of the mandible, the most precise cross section was selected as the measuring point and the distance from the most superior border of the mandibular canal to the alveolar crest was measured and analyzed 10 times by a dentist.
Results : There were no significant intraobserver differences in the distance from the most superior border of the mandibular canal to the alveolar crest (p>0.05). There were no significant differences among single detector computed tomography, multi-detector computed tomography and cone beam computed tomography in the distance from the most superior border of the mandibular canal to the alveolar crest (p>0.05).
Conclusion : Multi-detector computed tomography and cone beam computed tomography are clinically useful in the evaluation of pre-operative site for mandibular dental implants, with consideration for radiation exposure dose and scanning time.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Lindh C, "Visualization of the mandibular canal by different radiographic techniques" 3 : 90-97, 1992

2 Maher WP, "Topographic, microscopic, radiographic, and computerized morphometric studied of human adult edentate mandible for oral implantologists" 4 : 327-340, 1991

3 Williams MYA, "The role of computerized tomography in dental implantology" 7 : 373-380, 1992

4 Wang GE, "The effect of pitch in multislice spiral/helical CT" 26 : 2648-2653, 1999

5 Brink JA, "Technical aspects of helical (spiral) CT" 33 : 825-841, 1995

6 Kalender WA, "Spiral volumetric CT with single-breath-hold technique, continuous transport, and continuous scanner rotation" 176 : 181-183, 1990

7 Preda L, "Solcia M, Schifino MR, et al. Use of spiral computed tomography for multiplanar dental reconstruction" 26 : 327-331, 1997

8 Ekestubbe A, "Reliability of spiral tomography with the Scanora technique for dental implant planning" 4 : 195-202, 1993

9 Kim KD, "Reliability of spiral tomography for implant site measurement of the mandible" 27 : 27-47, 1997

10 Gröndahl K, "Reliability of hypocycloidal tomography for the evaluation of the distance from the alveolar crest to the mandibular canal" 19 : 2004-, 1991

11 Clark DE, "Radiation absorbed from dental implant radiology: A comparison of linear tomography, CT scan, and panoramic and intra-oral techniques" 16 : 156-164, 1990

12 Feldkamp LA, "Practical cone-beam algorithm" 1 : 612-619, 1984

13 McCollough CH, "Performance evaluation of a multi-slice CT system" 26 : 2223-2230, 1999

14 Hu H, "Multi-slice helical CT: scan and reconstruction" 26 : 5-18, 1999

15 Miles DA, "Implant radiology" 37 : 645-668, 1993

16 Hu H, "Four multidetector-row helical CT: image quality and volume coverage speed" 215 : 55-62, 2000

17 Johkoh T, "Evaluation of image quality and spatial resolution of low-dose high-pitch multidetector-row helical high-resolution CT in 11 autopsy lungs and a wire phantom" 19 : 279-284, 2001

18 Frederiksen NL, "Effective dose and risk assessment from computed tomography of the maxillofacial complex" 24 : 55-58, 1995

19 Frederiksen NL, "Diagnostic imaging in dental implantology" 80 : 540-554, 1995

20 Arai Y, "Development of a compact computed tomographic apparatus for dental use" 28 : 245-248, 1999

21 Boon JM, "Determination of the presampled MTF in computed tomography" 28 : 356-360, 2001

22 Schwartz MS, "Computed tomography: Part I. Preoperative assessment of the mandible for endosseous implant surgery" 2 : 137-148, 1987

23 Tammisaro E, "Comprehensive oral X-ray diagnosis: A preliminary description" 21 : 9-15, 1992

24 Araki K, "Characteristics of a newly developed dentomaxillofacial X-ray cone beam CT scanner (CB MercuRayTM): system configuration and physical properties" 33 : 51-59, 2004

25 Andersson JE, "CT-scanning in the preoperative planning of osseointegrated implants in the maxilla" 17 : 33-35, 1988

26 Rothman SLG, "CT in the preoperative assessment implant surgery" 168 : 171-175, 1998

27 Mozzo P, "Andreis IA. A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: preliminary results" 8 : 1558-1564, 1998

28 Abrahams JJ, "Anatomy of the jaw revisited with a dental CT software program" 14 : 979-990, 1993

29 Ekestubbe A, "Absorbed doses from computed tomography for dental implant surgery: comparison with conventional tomography" 22 : 13-17, 1993

30 Tal H, "A comparison of panoramic radiography with computed tomography in the planning of implant surgery" 20 : 40-42, 1991