한시의 보편적 가치와 조선후기 중국 문인과의 시문 교류 = Exchanging the Poetry Works with China in Joseon Period, and the Universal Value of Chinese Classical Poetry

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In Eastern Asia, Classical Chinese Poetry had a universal value based upon the common literary consciousness, and producing a fine work of poetry was thus recognized as a indicator of civilization. Hence, exchanging classical Chinese poems between Ming`s envoys and Joseon`s literati was more a kind of competition over the level of civilization than a mere recreation. Meanwhile, the attempts of Chinese literati to take record of Joseon`s classical Chinese poems and to include them in the compilation of Chinese poetry were a kind of imperial design to seize Joseon`s poetry as one of their airs of states(guofeng), consequentially as a decoration of the marvellous Chinese civilization. Importantly Kangxi Emperor published and sent to Joseon enormous encyclopedic works on poetry to prove Qing`s cultural centricity, and also demanded to tribute Joseon`s poetry works to check their cultural level. To this demand literati of 17th century Joseon usually objected to send the poetic works as they regarded themselves already possessing the cultural centricity based on Semi-Sinocentrism(Sojunghwasasang). Kim Chuntaek, however, argued that Joseon`s fine works of poetry should be sent to Qing positively, in order to boast Joseon`s cultural superiority. But by the age of 18th century, the era of Yongzheng Emperor and Qianlong Empeor, as Joseon accepted Qing`s actual dominance in power, literati of Joseon made companionship with intelligentia of Han Chinese, avoiding relationships with barbarious Qing and approving the Sinocentric culture of Han Chinese. By expressing their cultural pride over Manchu people in classical Chinese poetry, they could build up a strong bond of friendship beyond the national boundaries. Contary to its public role as a confrontation of civilization, classical Chinese poetry appeared to serve as a medium of communication in private relationships.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 金安老, "龍泉淡寂記"

2 김덕수, "조선 문사와 명 사신의 酬唱과 그 양상" 한국한문학회 27 : 105-137, 2001

3 이혜순, "전통과 수용: 한국고전문학과 해외교류" 돌베개 1-270, 2010

4 김문식, "유득공의 두 번째 중국 여행" 문헌과 해석사 (29) : 258-275, 2004

5 진재교, "동아시아에서 한국 한문학의 보편성과 특수성 ―중심과 주변의 변증법, 그리고 한문학―" 인문과학연구소 57 (57): 229-264, 2009

6 "국역조선왕조실록"

7 李夏坤, "頭陀草"

8 李德懋, "靑莊館全書"

9 魚叔權, "稗官雜記"

10 崔德中, "燕行錄日記"

11 徐浩修, "燕行紀"

12 金昌業, "燕行日記"

13 洪大容, "湛軒書"

14 鄭士龍, "湖陰雜稿"

15 徐巨正, "東人詩話"

16 成俔, "慵齋叢和"

17 朴思浩, "心田稿"

18 金春澤, "北軒居士集"

19 朴現圭, "中國 明末淸初人 朝鮮詩選集 硏究" 太學社 1-206, 1998

20 이춘희, "19세기 한중 문학교류" 새문사 1-355, 2009

21 이종묵, "17-18세기 中國에 전해진 朝鮮의 漢詩" 규장각한국학연구원 (45) : 15-49, 2009

22 宋相琦, "(別本)東文選"