RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    국가표준 예방접종률 조사방법을 이용한 3세 아동의 예방접종률 = Vaccination Coverage Rate among 3 Year Olds (Cohort Born in 2007) Using Korea National Immunization Survey Method

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103712552

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Objectives: The purpose of measuring vaccination coverage rate is to monitor adequate vaccination status for reducing communicable disease occurrence. So lots of nations surveyed vaccination coverage by the use of various measuring methods, and developed immunization policy and program following to these survey results. This study developed standard Korea National Immunization Survey method for measuring vaccination coverage in national and metropolitan level, and then measured real status, finally, suggested further developmental directions of national standard survey method.
    Methods: We developed the formal process as a national standard, go through Korean national advisory committee for vaccination and then Statistics Korea. We performed the computer aided telephone interview. The source of information is household-retained vaccination cards. And survey population is 7,040 at 3-year-olds (cohort born in 2007) who registered in national immunization registry system. The unit of sampling is each metropolitan and provincial area using minimum sample size determination method (precision 5%, confidence interval 95%, assumed coverage rate 50%).
    Results: The national vaccination coverage per dose was 1 dose BCG 98.8%, 1st dose Hepatitis B 99.0%, 2nd dose Hepatitis B 99.3%, 3rd dose Hepatitis B 98.7%, 1st DTaP 99.6%, 2nd dose DTaP 99.5%, 3rd dose DTaP 99.1%, 4th dose DTaP 93.5%, 1st dose poliovirus 99.4%, 2nd dose poliovirus 99.3%, 3rd dose poliovirus 98.4%, 1st dose MMR 99.2%, 1 dose varicella 97.7%, 1st dose Japanese encephalitis 97.9%, 2nd dose Japanese encephalitis 95.9%, 3rd dose Japanese encephalitis 90.7%.
    Other vaccination coverage per dose was 1st dose Hib 90.9%, 2nd dose Hib 87.7%, 3rd dose Hib 82.5%, 4th dose Hib 69.4%, 1st dose Hepatitis A 84.5%, 2nd dose Hepatitis A 78.1%, 1st dose pneumococcus 67.1%, 2nd dose pneumococcus 60.5%, 3rd dose pneumococcus 56.7%, 4th dose pneumococcus 51.4%, 1st dose rotavirus 6.0%, 2nd dose rotavirus 5.5%, 3rd dose rotavirus 5.1%.
    In completeness for each vaccine, total 3 doses of Hepatitis B was estimated at 98.2%, 3 doses of DTaP 99.0%, 4 doses of DTaP 93.2%, 3 doses poliovirus of 98.4%. And series vaccination coverage was 95.9% at 3:3:3:1, 91.9% at 4:3:1, 90.4% at 4:3:1:3:1, 88.7% at 4:3:1:3:1:1, 56.3%at 4:3:1:3:1:1:3.
    Conclusions: The Korean vaccination coverage rates are adequate in terms of the herd immunity.
    To improve measuring method for national vaccination coverage rate, our nation must have adequate national immunization registry system. So, we can obtain accurate and timely individual immunization records.
    번역하기

    Objectives: The purpose of measuring vaccination coverage rate is to monitor adequate vaccination status for reducing communicable disease occurrence. So lots of nations surveyed vaccination coverage by the use of various measuring methods, and develo...

    Objectives: The purpose of measuring vaccination coverage rate is to monitor adequate vaccination status for reducing communicable disease occurrence. So lots of nations surveyed vaccination coverage by the use of various measuring methods, and developed immunization policy and program following to these survey results. This study developed standard Korea National Immunization Survey method for measuring vaccination coverage in national and metropolitan level, and then measured real status, finally, suggested further developmental directions of national standard survey method.
    Methods: We developed the formal process as a national standard, go through Korean national advisory committee for vaccination and then Statistics Korea. We performed the computer aided telephone interview. The source of information is household-retained vaccination cards. And survey population is 7,040 at 3-year-olds (cohort born in 2007) who registered in national immunization registry system. The unit of sampling is each metropolitan and provincial area using minimum sample size determination method (precision 5%, confidence interval 95%, assumed coverage rate 50%).
    Results: The national vaccination coverage per dose was 1 dose BCG 98.8%, 1st dose Hepatitis B 99.0%, 2nd dose Hepatitis B 99.3%, 3rd dose Hepatitis B 98.7%, 1st DTaP 99.6%, 2nd dose DTaP 99.5%, 3rd dose DTaP 99.1%, 4th dose DTaP 93.5%, 1st dose poliovirus 99.4%, 2nd dose poliovirus 99.3%, 3rd dose poliovirus 98.4%, 1st dose MMR 99.2%, 1 dose varicella 97.7%, 1st dose Japanese encephalitis 97.9%, 2nd dose Japanese encephalitis 95.9%, 3rd dose Japanese encephalitis 90.7%.
    Other vaccination coverage per dose was 1st dose Hib 90.9%, 2nd dose Hib 87.7%, 3rd dose Hib 82.5%, 4th dose Hib 69.4%, 1st dose Hepatitis A 84.5%, 2nd dose Hepatitis A 78.1%, 1st dose pneumococcus 67.1%, 2nd dose pneumococcus 60.5%, 3rd dose pneumococcus 56.7%, 4th dose pneumococcus 51.4%, 1st dose rotavirus 6.0%, 2nd dose rotavirus 5.5%, 3rd dose rotavirus 5.1%.
    In completeness for each vaccine, total 3 doses of Hepatitis B was estimated at 98.2%, 3 doses of DTaP 99.0%, 4 doses of DTaP 93.2%, 3 doses poliovirus of 98.4%. And series vaccination coverage was 95.9% at 3:3:3:1, 91.9% at 4:3:1, 90.4% at 4:3:1:3:1, 88.7% at 4:3:1:3:1:1, 56.3%at 4:3:1:3:1:1:3.
    Conclusions: The Korean vaccination coverage rates are adequate in terms of the herd immunity.
    To improve measuring method for national vaccination coverage rate, our nation must have adequate national immunization registry system. So, we can obtain accurate and timely individual immunization records.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 이석구, "필수예방접종비용 지원 수준별 전산등록의 질적 차이*" 한국모자보건학회 16 (16): 113-121, 2012

    2 World Development, "investing in health" Oxford university 8-, 1993

    3 Hinman AR, "Vaccinepreventable disease, immunization, and MMWR- 1961-2011" 60 : 49-53, 2011

    4 World Health Organization, "Training for mid-level managers: the EPI coverage survey" WHO 1-100, 1993

    5 Chen SZ, "The national childhood immunization registry in Israel" 4 : 9-13, 2011

    6 Ministry of Health, "The National Childhood Immunisation Coverage Survey 2005" 39 : 1-72, 2007

    7 Korean Institute for Health, "The 2009 National survey on fertility, family health and welfare in Korea" Korean Institute for Health and Social Affairs 2009

    8 Park SK, "Nationwide vaccine coverage level; conceptual methodology and survey" Seoul National University, Korean Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1-239, 2009

    9 Center for Disease Control and Prevention, "National and state vaccination coverage among children aged 19-35 months-United States, 2010" 60 (60): 1157-1163, 2011

    10 The NHS Information Centre., "NHS immunisation statistics England 2009-10" The NHS Information Centre 7-76, 2010

    1 이석구, "필수예방접종비용 지원 수준별 전산등록의 질적 차이*" 한국모자보건학회 16 (16): 113-121, 2012

    2 World Development, "investing in health" Oxford university 8-, 1993

    3 Hinman AR, "Vaccinepreventable disease, immunization, and MMWR- 1961-2011" 60 : 49-53, 2011

    4 World Health Organization, "Training for mid-level managers: the EPI coverage survey" WHO 1-100, 1993

    5 Chen SZ, "The national childhood immunization registry in Israel" 4 : 9-13, 2011

    6 Ministry of Health, "The National Childhood Immunisation Coverage Survey 2005" 39 : 1-72, 2007

    7 Korean Institute for Health, "The 2009 National survey on fertility, family health and welfare in Korea" Korean Institute for Health and Social Affairs 2009

    8 Park SK, "Nationwide vaccine coverage level; conceptual methodology and survey" Seoul National University, Korean Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1-239, 2009

    9 Center for Disease Control and Prevention, "National and state vaccination coverage among children aged 19-35 months-United States, 2010" 60 (60): 1157-1163, 2011

    10 The NHS Information Centre., "NHS immunisation statistics England 2009-10" The NHS Information Centre 7-76, 2010

    11 World Health Organization, "Monitoring immunization services using the Lot Quality Technique" WHO 1996

    12 Fairbrother G, "Measuring immunization coverage" 19 (19): 78-88, 2000

    13 Theeten H, "Infant vaccination coverage in 2005 and predictive factors for complete or valid vaccination in Flanders, Belgium: an EPI-survey" 25 (25): 4940-4948, 2007

    14 Salmaso S, "Infant immunization coverage in Italy: estimates by simultaneous EPI cluster surveys of regions" 77 (77): 843-849, 1999

    15 WHO/UNICEF, "Immunization coverage estimates" 2011

    16 Immunisation Advisory Centre, "Immunisation coverage and vaccine preventable diseases in New Zealand" 2010

    17 Brownson RC, "Gillespie KN. Evidence-based public health" Oxford university press 146-147, 2003

    18 Papania M, "For better immunization coverage, measure coverage better" 367 : 925-926, 2006

    19 박보영, "Estimation of Nationwide Vaccination Coverage and Comparison of Interview and Telephone Survey Methodology for Estimating Vaccination Status" 대한의학회 26 (26): 711-719, 2011

    20 Shin EC, "Development of vaccination coverage estimation methods and evaluation indicators of national immunization program in Korea" Catholic University, Korean Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1-332, 2005

    21 Hoshaw-Woodard S, "Description and comparison of the methods of cluster sampling and lot quality assurance sampling to assess immunization coverage" WHO 2-3, 2001

    22 Kim YT, "Demonstration project for expansion of NIP (national immunization program) coverage" 48 (48): 579-586, 2005

    23 Public Health Agency of Canada, "Canadian national report on immunization" 32 (32): 1-44, 2006

    24 Hull BP, "Australian Childhood Immunisation Register - a model for universal immunization registers?" 27 (27): 5054-5060, 2009

    25 Crowcroft NS, "Action on immunization. No data, no action" 94 : 829-830, 2009

    26 이석구, "0~12세 아동에 대한 국가예방접종등록시스템 데이터베이스의 오류율, 충실도, 적시성 평가" 한국모자보건학회 13 (13): 135-144, 2009

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2017-12-01 등재 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
    2013-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.59 0.59 0.7
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.77 0.77 1.035 0.1
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼