임상문서 정보교류 시스템의 의미론적 상호운용성 확립을 위한 메타데이터 국제표준 적용방안 = Establishing semantic interoperability in the course of clinical document exchange using international standard for metadata registry

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Around the world electronic health records data are being shared and exchanged between two different systems for direct patient care, as well as for research, reimbursement, quality assurance,epidemiology, public health, and policy development. It is important to communicate the semantic meaning of the clinical data when exchanging electronic health records data. In order to achieve semantic interoperability of clinical data, it is important not only to specify clinical entries and documents and the structure of data in electronic health records, but also to use clinical terminology to describe clinical data. There are three types of clinical terminology: interface terminology to support a user-friendly structured data entry; reference terminology to store, retrieve, and analyze clinical data; and classification to aggregate clinical data for secondary use. In order to use electronic health records data in an efficient way, healthcare providers first need to record clinical content using a systematic and controlled interface terminology, then clinical content needs to be stored with reference terminology in a clinical data repository or data warehouse, and finally, the clinical content can be converted into a classification for reimbursement and statistical reporting. For electronic health records data collected at the point of care to be used for secondary purposes, it is necessary to map reference terminology with interface terminology and classification. It is necessary to adopt clinical terminology in electronic health records systems to ensure a high level of semantic interoperability.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, "United States Health Information Knowledgebase" Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

2 Humphreys BL, "The unified medical language system: an informatics research collaboration" 5 : 1-11, 1998

3 Cote RA, "The systematized nomenclature of human and veterinary medicine: SNOMED international. 3rd ed" College of American Pathologists 1993

4 Fridsma DB, "The BRIDG project: a technical report" 15 : 130-137, 2008

5 American Society for Testing and Materials, "Standard specification for continuity of care record (CCR)" ASTM International

6 Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium, "Operational data model" Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium

7 Solbrig HR, "Metadata and the reintegration of clinical information: ISO 11179" 17 : 25-28, 2000

8 Buetow KH, "Infrastructure for a learning health care system: CaBIG" 28 : 923-924, 2009

9 International Organization for Standardization, "Information technology: specification and standardization of data elements. Part 3. Basic attributes of data elements" ISO/ IEC 1994

10 Hurrell MJ, "Implementation of a standards-based anaesthesia record compliant with the health level 7 (HL7) clinical document architecture (CDA)" 26 : 295-304, 2012

11 Dolin RH, "HL7 clinical document architecture, release 2" 13 : 30-39, 2006

12 Smith B, "HL7 RIM: an incoherent standard" 124 : 133-138, 2006

13 Otter-Nickerson B, "HIE: the interoperable way to deliver quality healthcare: finally, the concept of health information exchange is being more concretely defined and accepted by the healthcare community" 32 : 19-, 2011

14 Richesson RL, "Data standards in clinical research:gaps, overlaps, challenges and future directions" 14 : 687-696, 2007

15 Warzel DB, "Common data element (CDE) management and deployment in clinical trials" 1048-, 2003

16 Costa CM, "Clinical data interoperability based on archetype transformation" 44 : 869-880, 2011

17 Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium, "Clinical data acquisition standards harmonization" Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium