RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    중학교 과학 교과서에서 사용된 그래프 유형과 활용 분석 = Analysis of the Uses of Graphs in Middle School Science Textbooks

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100181564

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Since graphing is a powerful tool in science for analyzing data and communicating quantitative information, and graphing ability is an important component of scientific literacy, nurturing graphing abilities is a major objective in science education. However, many students find graph-related activities to be difficult. In order to investigate this problem, a diagnosis of students learning processes, teaching materials and teaching methods is required. In this study, Korean middle school science textbooks are analyzed regarding the types of graph and the types and difficulty level of graphing activities contained by science contents(energy, matter, life, earth) and grade levels(7th, 8th, 9th). The results showed that the line graph was most frequently used(80%) and that there was limited variation in the types of graphs used. The types of graph were different depending on science contents. There was no trend observed between grade level and the types of graph used because the content of each chapter differed from grade to grade. Second, results showed that there were many graph constructing activities although there was more emphasis put on graph interpreting activities(63%) than graph constructing activities(37%). Such interpreting activities were also found to be most frequently required for subjects relating to matter(32%) and earth(25%), whereas constructing activities were more frequently required for subjects relating to matter(48%) and energy(38%). Both types of graphing activity were least used for subject relating to life. A requirement for both types of graphing activity was most frequently found in the 8th grade. Lastly, activities of interpreting relationship between 2 graphs were used more in subject related matter(39%) and life(36%). And no guidance was most used for subject relating to matter(69%) and guidance of variables was most used for subjects relating to matter(47%) and energy(42%). Guidance of axes was most used for subjects relating to energy(46%) and matter(43%) and guidance of scales was most used for subjects relating to matter(44%). Also no trend between activity level and grade level was observed for graph interpreting and constructing activities.
    번역하기

    Since graphing is a powerful tool in science for analyzing data and communicating quantitative information, and graphing ability is an important component of scientific literacy, nurturing graphing abilities is a major objective in science education. ...

    Since graphing is a powerful tool in science for analyzing data and communicating quantitative information, and graphing ability is an important component of scientific literacy, nurturing graphing abilities is a major objective in science education. However, many students find graph-related activities to be difficult. In order to investigate this problem, a diagnosis of students learning processes, teaching materials and teaching methods is required. In this study, Korean middle school science textbooks are analyzed regarding the types of graph and the types and difficulty level of graphing activities contained by science contents(energy, matter, life, earth) and grade levels(7th, 8th, 9th). The results showed that the line graph was most frequently used(80%) and that there was limited variation in the types of graphs used. The types of graph were different depending on science contents. There was no trend observed between grade level and the types of graph used because the content of each chapter differed from grade to grade. Second, results showed that there were many graph constructing activities although there was more emphasis put on graph interpreting activities(63%) than graph constructing activities(37%). Such interpreting activities were also found to be most frequently required for subjects relating to matter(32%) and earth(25%), whereas constructing activities were more frequently required for subjects relating to matter(48%) and energy(38%). Both types of graphing activity were least used for subject relating to life. A requirement for both types of graphing activity was most frequently found in the 8th grade. Lastly, activities of interpreting relationship between 2 graphs were used more in subject related matter(39%) and life(36%). And no guidance was most used for subject relating to matter(69%) and guidance of variables was most used for subjects relating to matter(47%) and energy(42%). Guidance of axes was most used for subjects relating to energy(46%) and matter(43%) and guidance of scales was most used for subjects relating to matter(44%). Also no trend between activity level and grade level was observed for graph interpreting and constructing activities.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 박경연, "통계적 교수, 학습 과정을 통한 그래프 이해력 증진에 관한 탐구" 11 : 107-126, 2001

    2 박현진, "지리 교과에서 학습자의 그래프 활용 특성에 관한 연구" 10 (10): 29-42, 2002

    3 이진봉, "지구과학 교과서에 사용된 그래프의 유형 및 특징 분석" 27 (27): 285-296, 2007

    4 김태선, "중학생의 그래프 능력과 논리적 사고력 및 과학 탐구 능력의 관계" 22 (22): 725-739, 2002

    5 교육부, "중학교 교육과정해설(3)-수학ㆍ과학ㆍ기술ㆍ가정" 교육부 1999

    6 김재우, "중학교 1학년 학생들의 탐구 문제에 대한 변인 판별 및 통제" 19 (19): 674-683, 1999

    7 김재우, "중학교 1학년 학생들의 자유 탐구보고서에 나타난 변인의 유형" 18 (18): 297-301, 1998

    8 김태선, "중고등학생들의 과학 그래프 작성 및 해석 능력" 22 (22): 768-778, 2002

    9 문경원, "생물 예비 교사의 빛의 세기에 따른 광합성률 측정 실험 수행 능력 조사" 35 (35): 652-662, 2007

    10 교육부, "과학과 교육과정" 교육부 1997

    1 박경연, "통계적 교수, 학습 과정을 통한 그래프 이해력 증진에 관한 탐구" 11 : 107-126, 2001

    2 박현진, "지리 교과에서 학습자의 그래프 활용 특성에 관한 연구" 10 (10): 29-42, 2002

    3 이진봉, "지구과학 교과서에 사용된 그래프의 유형 및 특징 분석" 27 (27): 285-296, 2007

    4 김태선, "중학생의 그래프 능력과 논리적 사고력 및 과학 탐구 능력의 관계" 22 (22): 725-739, 2002

    5 교육부, "중학교 교육과정해설(3)-수학ㆍ과학ㆍ기술ㆍ가정" 교육부 1999

    6 김재우, "중학교 1학년 학생들의 탐구 문제에 대한 변인 판별 및 통제" 19 (19): 674-683, 1999

    7 김재우, "중학교 1학년 학생들의 자유 탐구보고서에 나타난 변인의 유형" 18 (18): 297-301, 1998

    8 김태선, "중고등학생들의 과학 그래프 작성 및 해석 능력" 22 (22): 768-778, 2002

    9 문경원, "생물 예비 교사의 빛의 세기에 따른 광합성률 측정 실험 수행 능력 조사" 35 (35): 652-662, 2007

    10 교육부, "과학과 교육과정" 교육부 1997

    11 김태선, "고등학생들의 그래프 능력과 과학 탐구 능력 및 과학 학업 성취도의 관계" 25 (25): 624-633, 2005

    12 McKenzie, D. L, "The construc-tion and validation of the test of graphing in science (TOGS)" 23 (23): 571-579, 1986

    13 Shaw, J. M, "Making graphs" Arithme-tic Teacher 7-11, 1984

    14 Friel, S. N, "Ma-king sense of graphs: Critical factors influencing com-pre-hension and instructional implications" 32 (32): 124-158, 2001

    15 Wavering,M.J, "Logical reasoning necessary to make line graphs" 26 (26): 373-379, 1989

    16 Brasell, H. M, "Graphing skills among high school physics students" 93 (93): 62-70, 1993

    17 Leinhardt, G, "Func-tions, graphs, and graphing: Tasks, learning, and tea-ching" 60 (60): 1-64, 1990

    18 Roth, W. M, "Dif-ferences in graph-related practices between high school biology textbooks and scientific ecology journals" 36 (36): 977-1019, 1999

    19 Bowen, G. M, "Data and graph interpretation practices among preservice science teachers" 42 (42): 1063-1088, 2005

    20 Berg, C. A, "Assessing students' abilities to construct and interpret line graphs: Dis-parities between multiple-choice and free-response instruments" 78 (78): 527-554, 1994

    21 송정화, "6차와 7차 교과서 분석을 통한 그래프 지도 방안.학교" 4 (4): 161-192, 2002

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2014-09-02 학회명변경 영문명 : 미등록 -> The Korean Society of Biology Education KCI등재
    2012-03-27 학술지명변경 한글명 : 한국생물교육학회지 -> 생물교육
    외국어명 : THE KOREAN JOURNAL OF BIOLOGY EDUCATION -> BIOLOGY EDUCATION
    KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-10-02 학술지명변경 외국어명 : THE KOREAN JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL EDUCATION -> THE KOREAN JOURNAL OF BIOLOGY EDUCATION KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.96 0.96 0.88
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.02 0.93 1.199 0.58
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼