RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      GDP를 넘어: 국민후생의 측정지표로서 25개 대안 GDP 비교 · 분석 = Beyond GDP: An Analysis of 25 Alternative Indices of GDP as Measures for National Welfare

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107498001

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The aim of this study is to set a starting point from which to develop an alternative to the GDP system based on its limitations and the existing indices. We examine alternative indices of GDP among 11 international organizations, 10 OECD member countries and 4 cities, from a comparative perspective. The comparison is made based on three criteria: the backgrounds and aims, methodologies and components (sub-indicators) of each index. The results of the analysis show that each of the 25 indices has more than 1 objective among the 3: measuring the quality of life, pursuing sustainability, and presenting a vision and policy recommendations. Each index also differs in the methodology: some have a single indicator system, while others have a dashboard or a list of all sub-indicators. Lastly, components (sub-indicators) of the 25 indices are classified into universal and unique indicators. Based on the findings, we draw four implications for the development of an alternative to GDP. First, a new index needs to incorporate a time dimension for a sustainable economy and well-being in terms of its aims. Second, building a single indicator system is recommended to make it work as a signpost to a desirable future for human life in terms of a methodology. Third, non-economic activities creating social values need to be considered, such as housework, volunteer work and civic participation in terms of components. Fourth, it is necessary for a new index to measure both the objective and subjective aspects of welfare.
      번역하기

      The aim of this study is to set a starting point from which to develop an alternative to the GDP system based on its limitations and the existing indices. We examine alternative indices of GDP among 11 international organizations, 10 OECD member count...

      The aim of this study is to set a starting point from which to develop an alternative to the GDP system based on its limitations and the existing indices. We examine alternative indices of GDP among 11 international organizations, 10 OECD member countries and 4 cities, from a comparative perspective. The comparison is made based on three criteria: the backgrounds and aims, methodologies and components (sub-indicators) of each index. The results of the analysis show that each of the 25 indices has more than 1 objective among the 3: measuring the quality of life, pursuing sustainability, and presenting a vision and policy recommendations. Each index also differs in the methodology: some have a single indicator system, while others have a dashboard or a list of all sub-indicators. Lastly, components (sub-indicators) of the 25 indices are classified into universal and unique indicators. Based on the findings, we draw four implications for the development of an alternative to GDP. First, a new index needs to incorporate a time dimension for a sustainable economy and well-being in terms of its aims. Second, building a single indicator system is recommended to make it work as a signpost to a desirable future for human life in terms of a methodology. Third, non-economic activities creating social values need to be considered, such as housework, volunteer work and civic participation in terms of components. Fourth, it is necessary for a new index to measure both the objective and subjective aspects of welfare.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼