RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI우수등재

    공시유형별 가결산이익의 정확성 및 정정공시

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100856848

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    In this study, we examine the property difference of preliminary financial reports by regulation types using 1,425 observations provided by DART database ranged from 2006 to 2008. Preliminary financial reports are announced mandatorily or voluntarily before actual earnings are finalized at the general shareholder meeting in Korean stock market. There are two kinds of preliminary financial reports by regulation types in Korean stock market. The first type of the preliminary financial report is called ``Timely disclosure``. Firms are required to disclose preliminary financial reports when they face the material change in the current net income compared to the prior net income. The other type of the preliminary financial report is called ``Fair disclosure``. Firms voluntarily disclose information regarding earings forecasts for analysts and investors before they are audited. The main difference between the two types of preliminary financial reports is whether it is mandatory or not. As stated, the ``Timely disclosure`` is mandatory while the ``Fair disclosure`` is voluntary. Prior research suggests that such preliminary financial reports have a tendency to be optimistic compared to actual earnings. One of reasons suggested by prior research is that there would be no serious penalty for the over-estimation if firms disclose the restatement of preliminary financial reports. In addition, market participants show significant reactions to preliminary financial reports, meaning that preliminary financial reports are useful in their decision making. In other words, market participants take the information from preliminary financial reports into account when they make investment decisions. However, those studies do not take regulation types into account in examining the properties of preliminary financial reports. Moreover, their definitions of preliminary financial reports are generally mixed. Therefore, it may have additional empirical implications to examine the properties of preliminary financial reports by regulation types, such as Timely Disclosure and Fair Disclosure, especially in that the two types of disclosures show a significant difference: mandatory versus voluntary. The difference is likely to affect various aspects of financial reporting. We also investigate firm characteristics for the restatement of preliminary financial reports by using 652 restatements of preliminary financial reports. In order to test our empirical hypotheses, we include regulation-type variables in OLS regressions for the properties of preliminary financial reports. From this test, we find that preliminary financial reports for Fair Disclosure is more accurate and less biased, compared to preliminary financial reports for Timely Disclosure. In addition, we regress the bias and accuracy on firm characteristics variables, such as firm size, leverage, ROE, and market to book value. From this test, we find that the larger firm size is, the more accurate restatements are, while the accuracy of restatements decreases when firms are more leveraged, and less profitable. Finally, we find that restatements are informative. The findings of this study suggest that managers make less effort and take advantage of restatements when disclosing preliminary financial reports for mandatary Timely Disclosure, compared to for voluntary Fair Disclosure. In other words, the findings imply that the regulation type (mandatory versus voluntary) affects the properties of preliminary reports. We believe that this result provides insights not only for potential investors but also for regulators.
    번역하기

    In this study, we examine the property difference of preliminary financial reports by regulation types using 1,425 observations provided by DART database ranged from 2006 to 2008. Preliminary financial reports are announced mandatorily or voluntarily ...

    In this study, we examine the property difference of preliminary financial reports by regulation types using 1,425 observations provided by DART database ranged from 2006 to 2008. Preliminary financial reports are announced mandatorily or voluntarily before actual earnings are finalized at the general shareholder meeting in Korean stock market. There are two kinds of preliminary financial reports by regulation types in Korean stock market. The first type of the preliminary financial report is called ``Timely disclosure``. Firms are required to disclose preliminary financial reports when they face the material change in the current net income compared to the prior net income. The other type of the preliminary financial report is called ``Fair disclosure``. Firms voluntarily disclose information regarding earings forecasts for analysts and investors before they are audited. The main difference between the two types of preliminary financial reports is whether it is mandatory or not. As stated, the ``Timely disclosure`` is mandatory while the ``Fair disclosure`` is voluntary. Prior research suggests that such preliminary financial reports have a tendency to be optimistic compared to actual earnings. One of reasons suggested by prior research is that there would be no serious penalty for the over-estimation if firms disclose the restatement of preliminary financial reports. In addition, market participants show significant reactions to preliminary financial reports, meaning that preliminary financial reports are useful in their decision making. In other words, market participants take the information from preliminary financial reports into account when they make investment decisions. However, those studies do not take regulation types into account in examining the properties of preliminary financial reports. Moreover, their definitions of preliminary financial reports are generally mixed. Therefore, it may have additional empirical implications to examine the properties of preliminary financial reports by regulation types, such as Timely Disclosure and Fair Disclosure, especially in that the two types of disclosures show a significant difference: mandatory versus voluntary. The difference is likely to affect various aspects of financial reporting. We also investigate firm characteristics for the restatement of preliminary financial reports by using 652 restatements of preliminary financial reports. In order to test our empirical hypotheses, we include regulation-type variables in OLS regressions for the properties of preliminary financial reports. From this test, we find that preliminary financial reports for Fair Disclosure is more accurate and less biased, compared to preliminary financial reports for Timely Disclosure. In addition, we regress the bias and accuracy on firm characteristics variables, such as firm size, leverage, ROE, and market to book value. From this test, we find that the larger firm size is, the more accurate restatements are, while the accuracy of restatements decreases when firms are more leveraged, and less profitable. Finally, we find that restatements are informative. The findings of this study suggest that managers make less effort and take advantage of restatements when disclosing preliminary financial reports for mandatary Timely Disclosure, compared to for voluntary Fair Disclosure. In other words, the findings imply that the regulation type (mandatory versus voluntary) affects the properties of preliminary reports. We believe that this result provides insights not only for potential investors but also for regulators.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 김우영, "잠정이익과 보고이익의 보수주의 및 감사 효과, Working paper" 2009

    2 손성규, "손익구조변경 수시공시의 정보효과에 대한 실증분석" 한국회계학회 14 (14): 29-56, 2005

    3 "뻥튀기 실적발표 후 정정- 얌체공시 극성"

    4 금융감독원, "기업공시제도 해설(제2 수정판)"

    5 금융감독원, "공정공시제도 도입방안"

    6 금융감독원, "공시의무 위반행위에 대한 과징금 부과기준 개선"

    7 문상혁, "가결산이익의 과대공시와 사외이사의 특성" 한국세무학회 7 (7): 133-152, 2006

    8 송인만, "가결산공시 시기의 적절성과 정보유용성" 한국회계학회 31 (31): 151-182, 2006

    9 장지인, "가결산결과의 사전공시 현황 및 공시기업의 특성과 주가반응의 선점효과" 한국회계학회 28 (28): 79-108, 2003

    10 여은정, "가결산 연간이익의 정정공시에 대한 시장 반응과 재무분석가 예측에의 영향" 연세대학교 2005

    1 김우영, "잠정이익과 보고이익의 보수주의 및 감사 효과, Working paper" 2009

    2 손성규, "손익구조변경 수시공시의 정보효과에 대한 실증분석" 한국회계학회 14 (14): 29-56, 2005

    3 "뻥튀기 실적발표 후 정정- 얌체공시 극성"

    4 금융감독원, "기업공시제도 해설(제2 수정판)"

    5 금융감독원, "공정공시제도 도입방안"

    6 금융감독원, "공시의무 위반행위에 대한 과징금 부과기준 개선"

    7 문상혁, "가결산이익의 과대공시와 사외이사의 특성" 한국세무학회 7 (7): 133-152, 2006

    8 송인만, "가결산공시 시기의 적절성과 정보유용성" 한국회계학회 31 (31): 151-182, 2006

    9 장지인, "가결산결과의 사전공시 현황 및 공시기업의 특성과 주가반응의 선점효과" 한국회계학회 28 (28): 79-108, 2003

    10 여은정, "가결산 연간이익의 정정공시에 대한 시장 반응과 재무분석가 예측에의 영향" 연세대학교 2005

    11 전영순, "가결산 순이익의 과대공시와 기업특성 및 시장의 사후 감시기능" 한국회계학회 30 (30): 79-105, 2005

    12 Atiase, R., "Timeliness of Financial Reporting:The Firm Size Effect and Stock Price Reactions to Annual Earnings Announcement" 5 : 526-552, 1989

    13 Brown, L., "The Superiority of Analyst Forecasts as Measures of Expectations:Evidence from Earnings" (3) : 1-16, 1978

    14 Penman,S, "The Articulation of Price-Earnings Ratios and Market-to Book Ratios and the Evaluation of Growth" 34 (34): 235-259, 1996

    15 Teoh, S. H, "Perceived Auditor Quality and the Earnings Response Coefficient" 68 (68): 346-366, 1993

    16 Bhushan,R, "Firm Characteristics and Analyst Following" (7) : 255-274, 1989

    17 DeAngelo,L, "Auditor Independence,Lowballing and Disclosure Regulation" 17 : 113-143, 1981

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2017-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.45 1.45 1.48
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.64 1.69 2.793 0.2
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼