RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI우수등재

    삼성과 닛산의 협력전개 과정에 대한 연구 = 삼성자동차 사례

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100856849

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    What factors promote effective cooperation between partner companies an IJV? And how does such cooperation at the corporate level emerge over time? This paper investigates the relationships between partner objectives, ownership and control, task complexity, differences in organization structure and procedure and trust dynamics. The study adopted an ethnographic approach, employing participant observation, interview and document analysis, in order to provide thick descriptions through a deeper understanding of the actual interaction between companies. This research involved longitudinal in-depth immersion in the field so as to uncover the tacit nature of causal relationships and processes. Although the fieldwork seemingly focused on a single company, the study involved the examination of inter-company cooperation amongst Samsung, Nissan, and Renault, comparisons between New Product Development (NPD) projects. Thus, this study draws on multiple qualitative research methods in order to produce a holistic analysis and raise the validity of the empirical findings. Several results help to shed light on the theories of trust and cooperation and their application to inter-firm alliances. The empirical findings are as follows: First, the identification of complementary capabilities at the start is a necessary but not a sufficient condition for partner companies to achieve effective cooperation in an International Joint Venture (IJV). In practice, it is important to give regard to developing a culture of reciprocity and mutual learning so as to sustain long-term, effective cooperation. Further, ownership and control of an IJV have a direct impact on cooperation, through which an IJV becomes similar to its parent companies in organization structure and processes. Nevertheless, the relationship between Nissan and Samsung exemplifies the fact that equity ownership is not a necessary condition for effective cooperation. Second, the developing of trust is critical for effective cooperation. Developing a new cooperation process is necessary because it becomes the basis of the building of trust. Corporate-level commitment and learning play an important role in developing inter-firm trust. Corporate commitment originates from inter-personal relationships and enables trust between functions to emerge. Trust between functions may continue even when inter-company trust is weakened if learning and informal human relationships are maintained. Third, despite the effectiveness of concurrent technology transfer, the organizational capabilities of an IJV are necessary for the implementation of such transfer. The selection of a manageable base platform and the inducing of support from partner companies are prerequisites for an IJV to be successful. Similarity in organization structure and processes between parent companies and an IJV has a positive impact on cooperation.
    번역하기

    What factors promote effective cooperation between partner companies an IJV? And how does such cooperation at the corporate level emerge over time? This paper investigates the relationships between partner objectives, ownership and control, task compl...

    What factors promote effective cooperation between partner companies an IJV? And how does such cooperation at the corporate level emerge over time? This paper investigates the relationships between partner objectives, ownership and control, task complexity, differences in organization structure and procedure and trust dynamics. The study adopted an ethnographic approach, employing participant observation, interview and document analysis, in order to provide thick descriptions through a deeper understanding of the actual interaction between companies. This research involved longitudinal in-depth immersion in the field so as to uncover the tacit nature of causal relationships and processes. Although the fieldwork seemingly focused on a single company, the study involved the examination of inter-company cooperation amongst Samsung, Nissan, and Renault, comparisons between New Product Development (NPD) projects. Thus, this study draws on multiple qualitative research methods in order to produce a holistic analysis and raise the validity of the empirical findings. Several results help to shed light on the theories of trust and cooperation and their application to inter-firm alliances. The empirical findings are as follows: First, the identification of complementary capabilities at the start is a necessary but not a sufficient condition for partner companies to achieve effective cooperation in an International Joint Venture (IJV). In practice, it is important to give regard to developing a culture of reciprocity and mutual learning so as to sustain long-term, effective cooperation. Further, ownership and control of an IJV have a direct impact on cooperation, through which an IJV becomes similar to its parent companies in organization structure and processes. Nevertheless, the relationship between Nissan and Samsung exemplifies the fact that equity ownership is not a necessary condition for effective cooperation. Second, the developing of trust is critical for effective cooperation. Developing a new cooperation process is necessary because it becomes the basis of the building of trust. Corporate-level commitment and learning play an important role in developing inter-firm trust. Corporate commitment originates from inter-personal relationships and enables trust between functions to emerge. Trust between functions may continue even when inter-company trust is weakened if learning and informal human relationships are maintained. Third, despite the effectiveness of concurrent technology transfer, the organizational capabilities of an IJV are necessary for the implementation of such transfer. The selection of a manageable base platform and the inducing of support from partner companies are prerequisites for an IJV to be successful. Similarity in organization structure and processes between parent companies and an IJV has a positive impact on cooperation.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "Tokyo. Yuka Shoken Hokokusho, the Ministry of Finance, Japan"

    2 Macneil, I. R, "The Many Futures of Contracts" 47 : 691-816, 1974

    3 Geertz, C, "The Interpretation of Cultures" Basic Books 1973

    4 "Technical Assistance and License Agreement between Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. and Samsung Heavy Industries Co., Ltd"

    5 Chandler, Jr., A. D, "Strategy and Structure" The MIT Press 1962

    6 Sako, M, "Prices, Quality and Trust" Cambridge University Press 1992

    7 Yoshino, M, "Harvard Business School case" Nissan Motor Co., Ltd 2002

    8 Lane, C, "Co-operation in Inter-Firm Relations in Britain and Germany: The Role of Social Institutions" 48 : 226-254, 1997

    1 "Tokyo. Yuka Shoken Hokokusho, the Ministry of Finance, Japan"

    2 Macneil, I. R, "The Many Futures of Contracts" 47 : 691-816, 1974

    3 Geertz, C, "The Interpretation of Cultures" Basic Books 1973

    4 "Technical Assistance and License Agreement between Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. and Samsung Heavy Industries Co., Ltd"

    5 Chandler, Jr., A. D, "Strategy and Structure" The MIT Press 1962

    6 Sako, M, "Prices, Quality and Trust" Cambridge University Press 1992

    7 Yoshino, M, "Harvard Business School case" Nissan Motor Co., Ltd 2002

    8 Lane, C, "Co-operation in Inter-Firm Relations in Britain and Germany: The Role of Social Institutions" 48 : 226-254, 1997

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2017-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.45 1.45 1.48
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.64 1.69 2.793 0.2
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼