RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      女子 高等學生의 運動 遂行 結果에 對한 歸因 性向 分析 = Analysis of Attributional Disposition for Results from Motor Performance to the high school girls

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A1994260

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study is to help our physical education teachers to teach their students by letting them recognize the cause of success of failure in performing exercise, consequently reinforcing the learning motive for the following learning, and by enabling to develop the more effective study programs through making an analysis of attributional disposition for success or failure.
      Using the measure for test of attributional type by Russel and Maccley(CDS), this study was done on the two groups of students who were at the second grade of B-girls' high school in Puyo Chungnam-do, each of which was consisted of 100 students. One group was satisfied with the accuracy of badminton service and the other was not.
      First, How can the students' attribution from results make a difference according to whether they are satisfied with or not results from the test for accuracy of badminton service?
      Second, How can the students' score under each attribution make a difference according to whether they are satisfied with or not results from the test for accuracy of badminton service?
      Third, How can the students' score under each attribution from results make a difference according to the result attribution of the test for accuracy of badminton service?
      Based on the collected data, I did -test, T-test, F-test and Scheff e by spss pc. According to the above data, the conclusions can be inferred like these :
      First, satisfaction-group with the accuracy of badminton service attributes its success to effort; and dissatisfaction-group to luck.
      Second, the group under internal-control-dimension feels very satisfied with the accuracy of badminton-service, and the group under extra-control-dimension and instability dimension doesn't do so.
      Third, the group under stability-dimension, attributing its success to ability and task, makes more scores than the other, attributing to effort and ability.
      The group nuder internal-control-dimension, attributing its success to effort and ability, makes more scores than the other, attributing to luck and task.
      The group nuder extra-control-dimension, attributing its success to luck and task, makes more scores than the other, attributing to effort and ability.
      From the above results, the conclusion can be inferred like this:
      It is desirable that the attribution about the result from motor-performance should be under internal-control-dimension rather than extra-control-dimension and under instability-dimension rather than stability-dimension.
      번역하기

      This study is to help our physical education teachers to teach their students by letting them recognize the cause of success of failure in performing exercise, consequently reinforcing the learning motive for the following learning, and by enabling to...

      This study is to help our physical education teachers to teach their students by letting them recognize the cause of success of failure in performing exercise, consequently reinforcing the learning motive for the following learning, and by enabling to develop the more effective study programs through making an analysis of attributional disposition for success or failure.
      Using the measure for test of attributional type by Russel and Maccley(CDS), this study was done on the two groups of students who were at the second grade of B-girls' high school in Puyo Chungnam-do, each of which was consisted of 100 students. One group was satisfied with the accuracy of badminton service and the other was not.
      First, How can the students' attribution from results make a difference according to whether they are satisfied with or not results from the test for accuracy of badminton service?
      Second, How can the students' score under each attribution make a difference according to whether they are satisfied with or not results from the test for accuracy of badminton service?
      Third, How can the students' score under each attribution from results make a difference according to the result attribution of the test for accuracy of badminton service?
      Based on the collected data, I did -test, T-test, F-test and Scheff e by spss pc. According to the above data, the conclusions can be inferred like these :
      First, satisfaction-group with the accuracy of badminton service attributes its success to effort; and dissatisfaction-group to luck.
      Second, the group under internal-control-dimension feels very satisfied with the accuracy of badminton-service, and the group under extra-control-dimension and instability dimension doesn't do so.
      Third, the group under stability-dimension, attributing its success to ability and task, makes more scores than the other, attributing to effort and ability.
      The group nuder internal-control-dimension, attributing its success to effort and ability, makes more scores than the other, attributing to luck and task.
      The group nuder extra-control-dimension, attributing its success to luck and task, makes more scores than the other, attributing to effort and ability.
      From the above results, the conclusion can be inferred like this:
      It is desirable that the attribution about the result from motor-performance should be under internal-control-dimension rather than extra-control-dimension and under instability-dimension rather than stability-dimension.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 序 論
      • 1. 硏究의 必要性
      • 2. 硏究의 目的
      • 3. 硏究問題 및 假說
      • 4. 硏究의 制限點
      • Ⅰ. 序 論
      • 1. 硏究의 必要性
      • 2. 硏究의 目的
      • 3. 硏究問題 및 假說
      • 4. 硏究의 制限點
      • Ⅱ. 理論的 背景
      • 1. 理論的 模型
      • 2. 成就狀況에서 歸因
      • Ⅲ. 硏 究 方 法
      • 1. 硏究 對象
      • 2. 硏究 期間
      • 3. 測定種目 및 道具
      • 4. 資料收集 및 分析 方法
      • Ⅳ. 結果分析 및 論議
      • 1. 結果分析
      • 2. 論議
      • Ⅴ. 結論 및 提言
      • 1. 結論
      • 2. 提言
      • ※ 參考 文獻
      • ※ ABSTRACT
      • ※ 附 錄
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼