This study is to help our physical education teachers to teach their students by letting them recognize the cause of success of failure in performing exercise, consequently reinforcing the learning motive for the following learning, and by enabling to...
This study is to help our physical education teachers to teach their students by letting them recognize the cause of success of failure in performing exercise, consequently reinforcing the learning motive for the following learning, and by enabling to develop the more effective study programs through making an analysis of attributional disposition for success or failure.
Using the measure for test of attributional type by Russel and Maccley(CDS), this study was done on the two groups of students who were at the second grade of B-girls' high school in Puyo Chungnam-do, each of which was consisted of 100 students. One group was satisfied with the accuracy of badminton service and the other was not.
First, How can the students' attribution from results make a difference according to whether they are satisfied with or not results from the test for accuracy of badminton service?
Second, How can the students' score under each attribution make a difference according to whether they are satisfied with or not results from the test for accuracy of badminton service?
Third, How can the students' score under each attribution from results make a difference according to the result attribution of the test for accuracy of badminton service?
Based on the collected data, I did -test, T-test, F-test and Scheff e by spss pc. According to the above data, the conclusions can be inferred like these :
First, satisfaction-group with the accuracy of badminton service attributes its success to effort; and dissatisfaction-group to luck.
Second, the group under internal-control-dimension feels very satisfied with the accuracy of badminton-service, and the group under extra-control-dimension and instability dimension doesn't do so.
Third, the group under stability-dimension, attributing its success to ability and task, makes more scores than the other, attributing to effort and ability.
The group nuder internal-control-dimension, attributing its success to effort and ability, makes more scores than the other, attributing to luck and task.
The group nuder extra-control-dimension, attributing its success to luck and task, makes more scores than the other, attributing to effort and ability.
From the above results, the conclusion can be inferred like this:
It is desirable that the attribution about the result from motor-performance should be under internal-control-dimension rather than extra-control-dimension and under instability-dimension rather than stability-dimension.