RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      사회발전차원에서의 삶의 질 고찰 = A Study on the Quality of Life within Social Development Stage

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A19611078

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Until now, Korea government has stressed economical development among many fields that it is the political, economical, social and so on. Due to the planning, Korea has achieved surprising economical growth. Nevertheless, there was comparative poverty' because of poor policy on wealth distribution. So, it is necessary to reform unfair distribution of wealth and enlarge supply of social welfare service for improving quality of life to small income class. Because economical development plannings stressed mainly economical development policy, the government had little attention about environmental problems, even though it was important to prevent environmental problem in advance then after the fact.
      In this situation, we have to operate strong checking system about pollution and set up the policy in consideration of rational distribution of wealth. According to this, as a view point of nation development, it is stated that the government should effort to improve quality of life for everyone.
      So, this paper has forcused at the later between political development and social development which are final stage of the developing public administration theory model. Also, it deals with a environmental problems and social benefit, because they are closely related with quality of life.
      Given the difficulty of studies, its range limits environment part in the natural environment and social welfare part in the social environment.
      번역하기

      Until now, Korea government has stressed economical development among many fields that it is the political, economical, social and so on. Due to the planning, Korea has achieved surprising economical growth. Nevertheless, there was comparative poverty...

      Until now, Korea government has stressed economical development among many fields that it is the political, economical, social and so on. Due to the planning, Korea has achieved surprising economical growth. Nevertheless, there was comparative poverty' because of poor policy on wealth distribution. So, it is necessary to reform unfair distribution of wealth and enlarge supply of social welfare service for improving quality of life to small income class. Because economical development plannings stressed mainly economical development policy, the government had little attention about environmental problems, even though it was important to prevent environmental problem in advance then after the fact.
      In this situation, we have to operate strong checking system about pollution and set up the policy in consideration of rational distribution of wealth. According to this, as a view point of nation development, it is stated that the government should effort to improve quality of life for everyone.
      So, this paper has forcused at the later between political development and social development which are final stage of the developing public administration theory model. Also, it deals with a environmental problems and social benefit, because they are closely related with quality of life.
      Given the difficulty of studies, its range limits environment part in the natural environment and social welfare part in the social environment.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서 론
      • Ⅱ. 사회발전추구와 삶의 질
      • 1. 발전관의 변화
      • 2, 삶의 질 향상욕구증대
      • 3. 분석모형설정
      • Ⅰ. 서 론
      • Ⅱ. 사회발전추구와 삶의 질
      • 1. 발전관의 변화
      • 2, 삶의 질 향상욕구증대
      • 3. 분석모형설정
      • Ⅲ. 삶의 질 실태분석 및 문제점
      • 1. 환경부문
      • 1) 대기오염
      • 2) 수질오염
      • 3) 폐기물오염
      • 2. 사회복지부문
      • 1) 최저임금제
      • 2) 생활보호
      • 3) 사회복지서비스
      • 3. 문제점
      • 1) 환경부문
      • 2) 사회복지부문
      • Ⅳ. 삶의 질 향상방안
      • 1. 환경부문
      • 2. 사회복지부문
      • Ⅴ. 결 론
      • 참 고 문 헌
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼