RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    SCOPUS SCIE KCI등재

    白鼠의 中大腦動脈의 폐쇄와 재관류에 대한 실험모양인 頭蓋腔外 접근법과 經頭蓋腔 접근법에 대한 비교연구  :  Extracranial and Transcranial Methods = Reperfusion Models of Rat Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A40034504

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The author described a comparative study of 2 different expenemental methods of reperfusion models in rat ; 1) transcranial method(TC) and 2) extracranial method(EC). The transcranial method was performed by a direct approach to the middle cerebral artery(MCA) after temporozygomatic craniotomy in which a wire was hooked on the proximal portion of middle cerebral artery(MCA) and pulled it to make occlusion of MCA. For the extracranial method a nylon surgical thread was inserted intraluminally along the internal carotid artery(ICA) to reach the anterior communicating artery. Recirculation of blood was accomplished by removal of the hook or of the thread after 4 hours occlusion of MCA. Two different models were subdivided into 4 chronological goups pre-reperfusion, 30 minutes, 2 hours, and 48 hours after reperfusion. The differences were evaluated with morphometric analysis after neutral red(NR) or tetrazolium salt(TTC) staining.
    From the evaluation of initial ischemic area, the extracranial method showed a larger infarct volume as compared to the transcranial method(p=0.013). Mean value(SD) of infarcted area of EC and TC were 28.7% (4.4%) and 14.4% (8.1%) respectively. Recovery from the initial ischemia after reperfusion was gradually achieved in both of two groups(p<0.05). The restoration of blood flow after reperfusion was more rapid in EC group and only 2 hours reperfusion was enough to show no difference between two methods. In TC group followed by 48 hours' reperfusion, 40% of animals resulted in gross infarction of MCA temtory as noted with TTC stain, most probably due to reperfusion failure. EC group showed only one such a case(12.5 %). But this difference was not in the range of significance statistically. From a technical point of view, EC was more simple, needed less time since a craniotomy was not performed. and required no manipulation of the brain or any intracranial vessels. From these results the author concluded that the extracranial method is a more reliable and technically more manageable one to be used as a reperfusion model for investigating the focal cerebral ischemia.

    번역하기

    The author described a comparative study of 2 different expenemental methods of reperfusion models in rat ; 1) transcranial method(TC) and 2) extracranial method(EC). The transcranial method was performed by a direct approach to the middle cerebral ar...

    The author described a comparative study of 2 different expenemental methods of reperfusion models in rat ; 1) transcranial method(TC) and 2) extracranial method(EC). The transcranial method was performed by a direct approach to the middle cerebral artery(MCA) after temporozygomatic craniotomy in which a wire was hooked on the proximal portion of middle cerebral artery(MCA) and pulled it to make occlusion of MCA. For the extracranial method a nylon surgical thread was inserted intraluminally along the internal carotid artery(ICA) to reach the anterior communicating artery. Recirculation of blood was accomplished by removal of the hook or of the thread after 4 hours occlusion of MCA. Two different models were subdivided into 4 chronological goups pre-reperfusion, 30 minutes, 2 hours, and 48 hours after reperfusion. The differences were evaluated with morphometric analysis after neutral red(NR) or tetrazolium salt(TTC) staining.
    From the evaluation of initial ischemic area, the extracranial method showed a larger infarct volume as compared to the transcranial method(p=0.013). Mean value(SD) of infarcted area of EC and TC were 28.7% (4.4%) and 14.4% (8.1%) respectively. Recovery from the initial ischemia after reperfusion was gradually achieved in both of two groups(p<0.05). The restoration of blood flow after reperfusion was more rapid in EC group and only 2 hours reperfusion was enough to show no difference between two methods. In TC group followed by 48 hours' reperfusion, 40% of animals resulted in gross infarction of MCA temtory as noted with TTC stain, most probably due to reperfusion failure. EC group showed only one such a case(12.5 %). But this difference was not in the range of significance statistically. From a technical point of view, EC was more simple, needed less time since a craniotomy was not performed. and required no manipulation of the brain or any intracranial vessels. From these results the author concluded that the extracranial method is a more reliable and technically more manageable one to be used as a reperfusion model for investigating the focal cerebral ischemia.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼