부산지역의 근대문화유산과 역사인식문제 = Modern Cultural Heritage in Busan and Issues of Historical Awareness - Focused on `Registered Cultural Properties` in Busan -

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This paper was to consider the current status of modern heritage in Busan and the issues of historical awareness by focusing on the characteristics of `region` of Busan. In addition, through the preliminary studies on the modern heritage in Busan, this paper posed a problem that the concept, definition and study status of the `Modern Cultural Heritage` have been only focused on the superficial discussion of the absence of the history of `modern times`, and pointed out that there is composition `Pro Japanese Anti Japanese` strongly inherent in the viewpoint that the modern heritage in Busan is regarded as a negative heritage. In order to overcome the limitations of these preliminary studies, the issues of historical awareness on `modern times` in the modern heritage was considered based on cases of the `Busan Temporary Capital Government Building` and `The Old Namseonjeongi Company Building in Busan` which were built in the colonial period, but have been rarely mentioned related to Japan, among Registered Cultural Properties in Busan. As for the `Busan Temporary Capital Government Building`, if there were no joint opposition movement and resistance performed by Koreans and Japanese during a transfer process from Jinju to Busan on the transfer of the Gyeongnam Provincial Government, as a symbol of `Refuge Capital Busan Records`, the Provisional Government Building would not have existed. In addition, in the `The Old Namseonjeongi Company Building in Busan`, there is a historical fact inherent that there was a friction between the Japanese who were interested only in the monopoly management and the high profit-earning on Joseon Electric Business and the Governor-General that conducted the Electric Power Control Policy to control them. Like these, although the modern heritage in Busan is called `Modern (times)` Cultural Heritage, only preservation and utilization are focused without remembering the historical facts of `modern time.` Therefore, it will be necessary to keep in mind the significance of the heritage of `modern time` with consideration of Japan(The Empire of Japan), the `Other Party`.