러시아어 대화체 장르에서 말 끼어들기의 유형 및 담화기능

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The objective of this paper is to analyze a variety of types and the discourse function of intervention in Russian Spoken Language from the perspective of conversation analysis and interactional sociolinguistics. After
the intervention occur ‘interruption’ and ‘overlap’. The intervention means talk by more than a speaker at a time involving a second one speaking, and that the second one has projected his talk to begin at a possible completion point of the prior speaker's talk. If that's apparently the case, for example, his starts is in the environment of what could have been a completion point of the prior speaker's turn, then it means an overlap. If it's projected to begin in the middle of a point yhat is in no way a possible completion point for the turn, then it means as an interruption. In Russian spoken language the intervention can include four types according to various discourse functions: ‘favorable intervention’, ‘neutral intervention’, ‘unfavorable intervention’, ‘back-channels’, ‘inadvertent intervention’. As a result of the discourse analysis, the phenomenon of the intervention is found 418 total. Among them ‘favorable intervention’ is found 49.2%(206 times), ‘neutral intervention’: 19.1%(80 times out of 418), ‘back-channels’: 14%(59 times), ‘unfavorable intervention’: 11%(46 times),‘inadvertent intervention’:6.7%(27 times). Above all, the ‘favorable intervention’ performs the discourse function of‘commonness composition of discourser’, ‘with the increase of the speakers' intimacy’, ‘the demand of factual reconfirmation’, ‘the support of discourse topic’, ‘suggestion or recommendation’, among them ‘commonness composition of discourser’ is found the most of all as of 35.4%. Next, the ‘neutral intervention’ performs the discourse function of ‘the consistency of self-talking’, ‘the exchange of correct information’, ‘the thinking or meditation’, ‘the confirmation of facts’, ‘the cliche of proposals', among them ‘the consistency of self-talking’ is found the most of all as of 45%. Finally, the ‘unfavorable intervention’ performs discourse function of ‘the refutation against the counterpart in the discourse’, ‘negation’, ‘sarcasm,‘suspicion or discredit’, among them ‘the refutation against the counterpart in the discourse’ is found the most of all as of 35.4%.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 "＂말 중단시키기의 담화기능과 성" 26 : 71-102, 2003

2 "토크쇼에서 말 끼어들기: 담화기능과 사회적 요인" 6 (6): 23-59, 1999

3 "양상소사 Ну의 담화기능 및 의미 분석: 현대 러시아어 구어체 담화를 중심으로" 20 (20): 27-50, 2005

4 "Стратегия речевого поведения как отражение гендерных и социальных ро лей(в ситуации конфликиа)" Автореф. диссерт. кан- д.филол.наук. Минск 2001

5 "Социалингвистика в России" 16 (16): 2002

6 "Русский речевой портрет(РРП)" М.: Наука 1995

7 "interruptions and silences in conversation" 105-129, 1975

8 "On getting a word in edgewise" 557-578, 1970

9 "Interruptions and the interpretation of conversation" 171-188, 1981

10 "Interrupting the discourse on interruptions . Journal of Pragmatics" 1990

11 "An example of Conversational style . Journal of Pragmatics" 383-397, 1981

12 "Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments Some features of preferred/ dispreferred turn shapes . Structures of social action Studies in conversation analysis" Cambridge Univ. press 1984

13 "A simplest systemics for the organization of turn-taking" 696-730, 1974