Accuracy and Reliability of X-ray Measurements in the Cervical Spine

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Study Design: This study is a post hoc analysis of a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial which compared artificial disc replacement and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.
Purpose: Useful radiographic parameters for assessing cervical alignment include the Cobb angles, T1 slope (T1S), occipitocervical inclination (OCI), K-line tilt (KLT), and cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA). This study aimed to determine measurement accuracy and reliability for these parameters.
Overview of Literature: Various authors have assessed repeatability by comparing different methods of measurement, but knowledge of measurement error and minimal detectable change is scarce.
Methods: We evaluated 758 lateral cervical radiographs. One medical student and one spine surgeon (i.e., measured ×2 within 4 weeks) independently measured the parameters obtaining 5,850 values. Standard error of measurement (SEm) and minimum detectable change (MDC) were calculated for each parameter. The accuracy and reliability of the Cobb angle measurements were calculated for the different types of angles: cervical lordosis, prosthesis angle, segmental angle with two bone surfaces (SABB), and segmental angle with one bone and one metal surface. Reliability was determined with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).
Results: SEm was 1.8° and MDC was 5.0° for the Cobb angle, with an intraobserver/interobserver ICC of 0.958/0.886. All the different subtypes of Cobb angles had an ICC higher than 0.950, except SABB (intraobserver/interobserver ICC of 0.922/0.716). The most accurate and reliable measurement was for KLT.
Conclusions: This study provides normative data on SEm and MDC for Cobb angles, T1S, KLT, OCI, and cSVA in cervical lateral radiographs. Reliability was excellent for all parameters except SABB (e.g., good).

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Sakai K, "The K‐line tilt, a novel radiographic parameter of cervical sagittal balance, is a predictor of postoperative kyphotic deformity after laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy caused by ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament" Cervical Spine Research Society 2017

2 Skeppholm M, "The Discover artificial disc replacement versus fusion in cervical radiculopathy : a randomized controlled outcome trial with 2-year follow-up" 15 : 1284-1294, 2015

3 Janusz P, "Reliability of cervical lordosis measurement techniques on long-cassette radiographs" 25 : 3596-3601, 2016

4 Ames CP, "Reliability assessment of a novel cervical spine deformity classification system" 23 : 673-683, 2015

5 Tauchi R, "Reliability analysis of Cobb angle measurements of congenital scoliosis using X-ray and 3D-CT images" 26 : 53-57, 2016

6 R Core Team, "R: a language and environment for statistical computing" R Foundation for Statistical Computing

7 Cobb JR, "Outline for the study of scoliosis" 5 : 261-275, 1948

8 Yoon SD, "Occipitocervical inclination : new radiographic parameter of neutral occipitocervical position" 26 : 2297-2302, 2017

9 Langensiepen S, "Measuring procedures to determine the Cobb angle in idiopathic scoliosis : a systematic review" 22 : 2360-2371, 2013

10 Street J, "Intraobserver and interobserver reliabilty of measures of kyphosis in thoracolumbar fractures" 9 : 464-469, 2009

11 Ulmar B, "Inter-and intra-observer reliability of the Cobb angle in the measurement of vertebral, local and segmental kyphosis of traumatic lumbar spine fractures in the lateral X-ray" 130 : 1533-1538, 2010

12 Janusz P, "Influence of cervical spine position on the radiographic parameters of the thoracic inlet alignment" 24 : 2880-2884, 2015

13 Singhatanadgige W, "Correlation and reliability of cervical sagittal alignment parameters between lateral cervical radiograph and lateral whole-body EOS stereoradiograph" 6 : 548-554, 2016

14 Lee HD, "Comparative analysis of three imaging modalities for evaluation of cervical sagittal alignment parameters : a validity and reliability study" 42 : 1901-1907, 2017

15 Scheer JK, "Cervical spine alignment, sagittal deformity, and clinical implications : a review" 19 : 141-159, 2013

16 Ames CP, "Cervical radiographical alignment : comprehensive assessment techniques and potential importance in cervical myelopathy" 38 (38): S149-S160, 2013

17 Carpenter J, "Bootstrap confidence intervals : when, which, what? : a practical guide for medical statisticians" 19 : 1141-1164, 2000

18 Smith JS, "Association of myelopathy scores with cervical sagittal balance and normalized spinal cord volume : analysis of 56 preoperative cases from the AOSpine North America Myelopathy study" 38 (38): S161-S170, 2013

19 MacDowall A, "Artificial disc replacement versus fusion in patients with cervical degenerative disc disease with radiculopathy : 5-year outcomes from the National Swedish Spine Register" 30 : 159-167, 2018

20 Cote P, "Apophysial joint degeneration, disc degeneration, and sagittal curve of the cervical spine: can they be measured reliably on radiographs?" 22 : 859-864, 1997

21 Lee SW, "Analysis of accuracy of kyphotic angle measurement for vertebral osteoporotic compression fractures" 14 : 961-965, 2007