RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      고등학교 선택중심 교육과정에 제시된 학생 선택권의 의미와 구현 방안 탐색 = A Study of the Students` Selective Right in the Selective-centered National Curriculum

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A19679284

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The 7th revised national curriculum in Korea has been recently introduced to high schools. One of the major changes in the revised national curriculum is to emphasize the students` selective right in high school curriculum. The purpose of this study is to examine the meaning of the students` selective right and explore some ideas of promoting its main ideas in Korean high schools. In more detail, the aims of the study are to: 1) Identify the expectation on selective-centered curriculum and the specific meaning of the students` selective right suggested in the 7th national curriculum document. 2) Analyse the organizing table of selective-centered curriculum proposed for in school-based level in order to examine of whether the meaning of the students` selective right is reflected in the curriculum as intended in the 7th national curriculum. As a sample, the study analysed 30 cases gathered from high schools different in their size. 3) Explore some ideas leading to the achievement of the students` selective right in school-based level. The result of this study shows that the students` selective right of school based curriculum seems not to reflect sufficiently the expectation and intention as suggested in the national curriculum. The organizing table of selective-centered curriculum being introduced in high schools appears not to guarantee the students` selective right in a positive way by which students` choice in subject matters is assured. There are several reasons to explain this result. Most of schools do not seem to have enough facilities and staff members by which the students` selective right is guaranteed. Since students are not informed sufficiently in their choice of subject matters, teachers are likely to think that students` choice can be wrong. This means that the level of the students` selective right is mainly determined by school. The results suggest that in order to achieve the actual realization of the students` selective right, the national curriculum should allow schools to have more flexibility and autonomy on school-based level in curriculum decision making.
      번역하기

      The 7th revised national curriculum in Korea has been recently introduced to high schools. One of the major changes in the revised national curriculum is to emphasize the students` selective right in high school curriculum. The purpose of this study i...

      The 7th revised national curriculum in Korea has been recently introduced to high schools. One of the major changes in the revised national curriculum is to emphasize the students` selective right in high school curriculum. The purpose of this study is to examine the meaning of the students` selective right and explore some ideas of promoting its main ideas in Korean high schools. In more detail, the aims of the study are to: 1) Identify the expectation on selective-centered curriculum and the specific meaning of the students` selective right suggested in the 7th national curriculum document. 2) Analyse the organizing table of selective-centered curriculum proposed for in school-based level in order to examine of whether the meaning of the students` selective right is reflected in the curriculum as intended in the 7th national curriculum. As a sample, the study analysed 30 cases gathered from high schools different in their size. 3) Explore some ideas leading to the achievement of the students` selective right in school-based level. The result of this study shows that the students` selective right of school based curriculum seems not to reflect sufficiently the expectation and intention as suggested in the national curriculum. The organizing table of selective-centered curriculum being introduced in high schools appears not to guarantee the students` selective right in a positive way by which students` choice in subject matters is assured. There are several reasons to explain this result. Most of schools do not seem to have enough facilities and staff members by which the students` selective right is guaranteed. Since students are not informed sufficiently in their choice of subject matters, teachers are likely to think that students` choice can be wrong. This means that the level of the students` selective right is mainly determined by school. The results suggest that in order to achieve the actual realization of the students` selective right, the national curriculum should allow schools to have more flexibility and autonomy on school-based level in curriculum decision making.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-05-31 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> The Journal of Curriculum Studies KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 등재 신청제한 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 2.81 2.81 2.75
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      2.65 2.69 3.561 0.48
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼