아동,청소년 음란물 규제에 관한 고찰 -아동,청소년음란물 소지, 연상음란물을 중심으로- = A Study of the Child and Adolescent Pornography Regulation -Focused on Possessing Child Pornography and Pornography that Remind Child-

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Since the year 2000, sex crimes against children or adolescents have been at issue. So government has prepared measure of these sex crime. Releasing the identities of sexual offenders, electronic ankle bracelet for monitoring and medicine treatment for sexual impulse were enforced. Evenly possessing or downloading child pornography became subject of punishment. Though there was a fierce controversy over punishment for mere possessing child pornography, legal basis of punishment was prepared by amending “children and adolescents sex protection law.” But there has been criticism of these punishment. In recent five months, Roughly 60 out of every 220 child pornography crime were mere possessing child pornography. 58) In Children and Adolescents Sex Protection Law, “children or adolescents” or “people or expression things that can be obviously perceived as children or adolescents” were ruled as objects of pornography that child or adolescent appears in. Controversial point is whether these range of objects go against clarity principle and principle of proportion. The Constitutional Court ruled that these range of objects doesn’t go against clarity principle and principle of proportion. So, not only “downloading pornographic animation that virtual characters appear” but also “downloading pornography of which title includes school uniform or child” became subject to punishment. But this point can cause conflict of opinion over sexuality, privacy protection, free expression, etc. Because of these reasons, U.S. Supreme Court doesn’t regard “pornography that remind child” as child pornography and four constitutional judge member of The Constitutional Court of Korea insist that it is unconstitutional by making minority opinion. I think that “this opinion that it is unconstitutional” is worthy of listening. Ministry of Gender Equality and Familyalso limit the range of child pornography to case that cause sexual humiliation. In order that children and adolescents grow up to healthy members of society, purpose of this paper is regulating pornography that child or adolescent appears in, protecting children and adolescents from sex crime, considering and criticizing contents that government and parliament legislated, considering and criticizing contents that The Constitutional Court judged.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김슬기, "인터넷상 아동・청소년 이용 음란물 소지의 개념에 관한 검토 - 미국과의 비교를 중심으로 -" 과학기술법연구원 18 (18): 301-328, 2012

2 송문호, "아청법상 음란물소지죄의 제한적 적용가능성" 법학연구소 22 (22): 337-353, 2014

3 이건호, "아동･청소년이용음란물의 범죄구성요건에 대한 검토" 한국형사정책연구원 26 (26): 5-28, 2015

4 김두상, "아동청소년이용음란물의 단순소지 처벌에 관한 비판적 고찰" 서울시립대학교 법학연구소 21 (21): 135-166, 2013

5 윤철한, "아동음란물이 성범죄 증가의 원인?" 한국법제연구원 34 : 2012

6 이흔재, "아동음란물소지죄에 관한 형사정책 및 형법상의 문제점" 한국형사정책연구원 25 (25): 1-30, 2014

7 윤정숙, "아동음란물과 성범죄의 상관관계연구" 한국형사정책연구원 2012

8 강욱, "아동음란물 소지자의 처벌에 대한 연구- 모럴 패닉 모델을 중심으로 -" 위기관리 이론과 실천 10 (10): 225-243, 2014

9 김성규, "아동·청소년이용음란물의 개념적 한정성(限定性)-「아동·청소년의 성보호에 관한 법률」제2조의 문제점 -" 한국형사정책학회 25 (25): 227-247, 2013

10 임규철, "아동·청소년의 성보호에 관한 법률상의 ‘아동·청소년 이용음란물과 소지’에 대한 법적 고찰" 법학연구원 (44) : 83-104, 2013

11 임정호, "아동·청소년의 성보호에 관한 법률상 아동음란물 정의규정에 대한 미국법과의 비교 연구" 법학연구소 25 (25): 9-33, 2013

12 박강우, "아동 포르노그래피의 형법적 규제 - 국제적 동향과 현행법의 개선방안-" 한국형사정책학회 26 (26): 161-190, 2014

13 마이클 리프, "세상을바꾼 법정" 궁리 2013

14 금태섭, "디케의 눈" 궁리 2015

15 Dina McLeod, "Section 2259 Restitution Claims and Child Pornography Possession" 2011

16 Ty E. Haward, "Don’t Cache out Your Case: Prosecuting Child Pornography Possession Laws Based on Images Located in Temporary Interner Files" (Fall) : 2004

17 Simpson, B, "Controlling fantasy in cyberspace : cartoons, imagination and child pornography" Taylor & Francis 18 (18): 2009

18 Robert M. Sieg, "Attempted Possession of Child Pornography-A Proposed Approach for Criminalizing Possession of Child Pornographic of Unknown Origin" (Winter) : 2005