RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    초등학교 행정가의 작업세계 = Administrators Work in Elementary Schools

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A75195565

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    In fields such as education, where values and ethics are of particular importance, normative theories are popular: They are concerned with what ought to do. Normative theories have a number of advantages. They facilitate the development of theoretical structures for understanding ideal administrative functioning. And they set the standard for improving present levels of organizational and administrative functioning. Despite these advantages, normative theories fail to capture the world and work of administration as it really is. By contrast, descriptive theories are concerned with what it is, by describing the activities and events they represent.
    The purpose of this study was to describe what school administrators really do. The technique of observation was employed in its investigation. Since this method called for direct observation of position incumbents and notation of all events in minutes. Four elementary school administrators in Seoul area were observed, each for a period of six days. Following the observation, two analytical structures were applied to the field notes: both Elletts analytical structure for task areas and Martin and Willowers for the types of activities determined the final form of data. Time distribution of task areas and types of activities were computed in minutes.
    In term of task areas, administrators of elementary schools spent very little time on curriculum and instruction. All the administrators seemed to spend much time on maintenance, staff-personnel and support management. Because only 5.4% of administrators tasks were concerned with academic program, it could be concluded that most of the responsibility for curricular matters was delegated to the teaching staff. And maintenance tasks were undertaken by the administrators to insure smooth operation of the school routine.
    Over on-third of the administrators time was devoted to meetings, some unscheduled, but mostly scheduled. The administrators, in touring 12,61% of their time, emphasized this type of supervisory function to a somewhat greater extent. The school administrators spent a great deal of their time in interacting and communicating with other people. The data clearly indicated that the predominant activity of school administrators was their interaction with others. More than 35% of the administrators time was spent in interacting with others in schools. About 25% of their time was spent in communicating with their teaching staff. The remaining 10% of their time was allocated among students, parents, and outsiders.
    번역하기

    In fields such as education, where values and ethics are of particular importance, normative theories are popular: They are concerned with what ought to do. Normative theories have a number of advantages. They facilitate the development of theoretical...

    In fields such as education, where values and ethics are of particular importance, normative theories are popular: They are concerned with what ought to do. Normative theories have a number of advantages. They facilitate the development of theoretical structures for understanding ideal administrative functioning. And they set the standard for improving present levels of organizational and administrative functioning. Despite these advantages, normative theories fail to capture the world and work of administration as it really is. By contrast, descriptive theories are concerned with what it is, by describing the activities and events they represent.
    The purpose of this study was to describe what school administrators really do. The technique of observation was employed in its investigation. Since this method called for direct observation of position incumbents and notation of all events in minutes. Four elementary school administrators in Seoul area were observed, each for a period of six days. Following the observation, two analytical structures were applied to the field notes: both Elletts analytical structure for task areas and Martin and Willowers for the types of activities determined the final form of data. Time distribution of task areas and types of activities were computed in minutes.
    In term of task areas, administrators of elementary schools spent very little time on curriculum and instruction. All the administrators seemed to spend much time on maintenance, staff-personnel and support management. Because only 5.4% of administrators tasks were concerned with academic program, it could be concluded that most of the responsibility for curricular matters was delegated to the teaching staff. And maintenance tasks were undertaken by the administrators to insure smooth operation of the school routine.
    Over on-third of the administrators time was devoted to meetings, some unscheduled, but mostly scheduled. The administrators, in touring 12,61% of their time, emphasized this type of supervisory function to a somewhat greater extent. The school administrators spent a great deal of their time in interacting and communicating with other people. The data clearly indicated that the predominant activity of school administrators was their interaction with others. More than 35% of the administrators time was spent in interacting with others in schools. About 25% of their time was spent in communicating with their teaching staff. The remaining 10% of their time was allocated among students, parents, and outsiders.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • I. 서론
    • 2. 교육행정의 과업에 대한 규범적 관점과 서술적 관점
    • 1) 규범적 관점
    • 2) 서술적 관점
    • 3) 규범과 실제의 간격
    • I. 서론
    • 2. 교육행정의 과업에 대한 규범적 관점과 서술적 관점
    • 1) 규범적 관점
    • 2) 서술적 관점
    • 3) 규범과 실제의 간격
    • 3. 연구방법
    • 4. 연구의 제한점
    • 5. 결과분석
    • 1) 과업영역에 따른 시간분포
    • 2) 활동타입에 따른 시간분포
    • 6. 논의 및 결론
    • 참고문헌
    • 영문초록
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼