RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      가격경쟁에서 노조화된 혼합복점과 민영화 = Unionized Mixed Duopoly and Privatization under Bertrand Competition

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82491882

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      In the Bertrand competition, we compare social welfare under a unionized mixed duopoly with social welfare under privatization when the union is either wage-oriented or employment-oriented. Thus, we find that (i) regardless of the degree of imperfect substitutability, privatization cannot improve social welfare if unions care about the employment relative to wage, (ii) if unions become more wage-oriented under certain degree of imperfect substitutability, the unionized mixed duopoly market is more desirable in terms of social welfare, and vice versa, (iii) if unions become more wage-oriented under sufficient large degree of imperfect substitutability, the privatization is more desirable in terms of social welfare, and vice versa. Moreover, even though it is desirable to maintain the unionized mixed duopoly market, there can exist inefficient pricing policy for the public firm.
      번역하기

      In the Bertrand competition, we compare social welfare under a unionized mixed duopoly with social welfare under privatization when the union is either wage-oriented or employment-oriented. Thus, we find that (i) regardless of the degree of imperfect ...

      In the Bertrand competition, we compare social welfare under a unionized mixed duopoly with social welfare under privatization when the union is either wage-oriented or employment-oriented. Thus, we find that (i) regardless of the degree of imperfect substitutability, privatization cannot improve social welfare if unions care about the employment relative to wage, (ii) if unions become more wage-oriented under certain degree of imperfect substitutability, the unionized mixed duopoly market is more desirable in terms of social welfare, and vice versa, (iii) if unions become more wage-oriented under sufficient large degree of imperfect substitutability, the privatization is more desirable in terms of social welfare, and vice versa. Moreover, even though it is desirable to maintain the unionized mixed duopoly market, there can exist inefficient pricing policy for the public firm.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Jiang, L., "Welfare Analysis of Privatization in a Mixed Market with Bargaining" 24 : 395-406, 2006

      2 Naylor, R. A., "Wage Union Strategies and International Trade" 109 : 102-125, 1999

      3 Lommerud, K. E., "Unionised Oligopoly, Trade Liberalisation and Location Choice" 113 : 782-800, 2003

      4 Leahy, D., "Unionisation and Foreign Direct Investment: Challenging Conventional Wisdom?" 110 : 80-92, 2000

      5 De Fraja, G., "Union and Wages in Public and Private Firms: A Game Theoretic Analysis" 45 : 457-469, 1993

      6 Choi, K., "The Timing of Endogenous Wage Setting under Bertrand Competition in a Unionized Mixed Duopoly" MPRA 2010

      7 Binmore, K., "The Nash Bargaining Solution in Economic Modelling" 17 : 176-188, 1986

      8 Booth, A., "The Economics of the Trade Union" Cambridge University Press 1995

      9 Schmidt, K. M., "The Costs and Benefits of Privatization: An Incomplete Contracts Approach" 12 : 1-24, 1996

      10 Choi, K., "Strategic Budget Constraints of Public Firm under Bertrand Competition of Unionized Mixed Duopoly" MPRA 2010

      1 Jiang, L., "Welfare Analysis of Privatization in a Mixed Market with Bargaining" 24 : 395-406, 2006

      2 Naylor, R. A., "Wage Union Strategies and International Trade" 109 : 102-125, 1999

      3 Lommerud, K. E., "Unionised Oligopoly, Trade Liberalisation and Location Choice" 113 : 782-800, 2003

      4 Leahy, D., "Unionisation and Foreign Direct Investment: Challenging Conventional Wisdom?" 110 : 80-92, 2000

      5 De Fraja, G., "Union and Wages in Public and Private Firms: A Game Theoretic Analysis" 45 : 457-469, 1993

      6 Choi, K., "The Timing of Endogenous Wage Setting under Bertrand Competition in a Unionized Mixed Duopoly" MPRA 2010

      7 Binmore, K., "The Nash Bargaining Solution in Economic Modelling" 17 : 176-188, 1986

      8 Booth, A., "The Economics of the Trade Union" Cambridge University Press 1995

      9 Schmidt, K. M., "The Costs and Benefits of Privatization: An Incomplete Contracts Approach" 12 : 1-24, 1996

      10 Choi, K., "Strategic Budget Constraints of Public Firm under Bertrand Competition of Unionized Mixed Duopoly" MPRA 2010

      11 Matsumura, T., "Stackelberg Mixed Duopoly with a Foreign Competitor" 55 : 275-287, 2003

      12 Skaksen, M. Y., "Should Trade Union Appreciate Foreign Direct Investment?" 55 : 379-390, 2001

      13 Ishida, J., "Should Civil Servants be Restricted in Wage Bargaining? A Mixed-Duopoly Approach" 93 : 634-646, 2009

      14 Barcena-Ruiz, J. C., "Relocation and Public Ownership of Firms" 23 : 71-85, 2009

      15 Ishiguro, S., "Raising Wages to Deter Entry into Unionized Markets" 60 : 435-445, 2009

      16 Bos, D., "Privatization: A Theoretical Treatment" Oxford University Press 1991

      17 Mukherjee, A., "Privatization, Strategic Foreign Direct Investment and Host-country Welfare" 53 : 775-785, 2009

      18 Haskel, J., "Privatization, Liberalization, Wages and Employment: Theory and Evidence for the UK" 60 : 161-182, 1993

      19 Haskel, J., "Privatisation and X-Inefficiency: A Bargaining Approach" 43 : 301-321, 1995

      20 Vives, X., "Price and Quantity in a Differentiated Duopoly" 15 : 546-554, 1984

      21 White, M., "Political Manipulation of a Public Firm's Objective Function" 49 : 487-499, 2002

      22 Willner, J., "Policy Objectives and Performance in a Mixed Market with Bargaining" 17 : 137-145, 1999

      23 Matsumura, T., "Partial Privatization in Mixed Duopoly" 70 : 473-483, 1998

      24 Nett, L., "Mixed Oligopoly with Homogeneous Goods" 64 : 367-393, 1993

      25 Naylor, R. A., "International Trade and Economic Integration when Labour Markets are Generally Unionised" 42 : 1251-1267, 1998

      26 Skaksen, J. R., "International Outsourcing when Labour Markets are Unionized" 37 : 78-94, 2004

      27 Straume, O. R., "International Merger and Trade Liberalization: Implications for Unionized Labour" 21 : 717-735, 2003

      28 Harris, R. G., "Government Enterprise: An Instrument for the Internal Regulation of Industry" 13 : 125-132, 1980

      29 De Fraja, G., "Game Theoretic Models of Mixed Oligopoly" 4 : 1-17, 1990

      30 Matsumura, T., "Endogenous Cost Differentials between Public and Private Enterprises: A Mixed Duopoly Approach" 71 : 671-688, 2004

      31 Vives, X., "Duopoly Information Equilibrium: Cournot and Bertrand" 34 : 71-94, 1984

      32 Mezzetti, C., "Domestic Unionization and Import Competition" 31 : 79-100, 1991

      33 De Fraja, G., "Alternative Strategies of a Public Enterprise in Oligopoly" 41 : 302-311, 1989

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.58 0.58 0.52
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.45 0.36 0.783 0.06
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼